Recording Industry May Go After OiNK Admin Again

from the not-getting-the-message dept

We were as surprised as anyone that a UK court correctly realized that OiNK itself didn’t violate copyright law, and thus admin Alan Ellis hadn’t done anything illegal. But rather than understand the difference between infringing copyrights and hosting a tracker, the recording industry is now flipping out and insisting that Ellis must be punished somehow, and it may file a civil suit against him because apparently punishing people is more important than actually coming up with business models that work.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Recording Industry May Go After OiNK Admin Again”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Noel Coward says:

Re: IFPI Laughter

Careful, laughter could be construed as entertainment.
And …. if the IFPI have provided said entertainment,
well you could be charged for it!

Well, fairs fair, even those circus clowns should get paid.

Here have a banana then, careful not to slip on the proceeds.

All this legal monkey business is a bunch of shite me thinks. Since when is being vindictive deemed justice?

Oink Oink! Indeed.

Joe (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Well, he was acquitted of running a site that infringed copyright, but he DID confess, on the stand and under oath, that he had downloaded music personally. THAT could be used in the civil suit, as Mike pointed out in the previous story. I still think it’s a bunch of crap, but he DID openly admin to it, so it’s kind of his own fault. Proving exactly WHAT was downloaded and the appropriate penalty might be tough though. At the very least, they won’t be seeing all of the donated cash, and Alan won’t be seeing any jail time. Hopefully, the case will be tossed, but the have a leg to stand on on the civil case; the criminal case, not so much.

Hephaestus (profile) says:

Market Efficiencies ...

Definitions :

mar·ket – A public gathering held for buying and selling merchandise.

ef·fi·cien·cy – The ratio of the effective or useful output to the total input in any system.

What we are seeing here is the corporations attempting to prevent Market Efficiencies. Read the definitions. Markets sell merchandise, information is not merchandise. Being Efficient requires increasing your output while decreasing your costs.

The internet does a wonderful thing with information. It reduces the cost to almost nothing. IFPI, RIAA, MPAA, etc are all inefficiencies and road blocks in the system. They represent other inefficienct groups but do not produce anything. In the end they will go away as new systems come into existance that replace them making the system more efficient.

The Anti-Mike (profile) says:

Re: Market Efficiencies ...

There is no market if the people aren’t paying. There is no valid market if the seller doesn’t pay for the source product.

The internet only reduces the costs because it fails to pay for the source materials. The market efficiency you point to is artificial. It isn’t any different from the street hawkers here in Thailand selling photoshop for a few dollars. The cheap price is artificial, not at all considering anything other than the marginal costs to slap the material onto a CD. That isn’t efficiency, that is fallacy.

mike allen (profile) says:

no surprise

The record companies have a differant mindset to to rest of the human race in fact i often ask what planet they are on, they dont understand the web
they think that all P2P is illegal. Until they discover one that pays them. Like Mike said in a radio interveiw I had with him they are after their own bottom line.
that is all cant sell enough dispite single tracks in the UK sold more than EVER BEFORE last year through legal downloads (Itunes Amazon) more to sell to get in the chart. etc etc.

jjmsan (profile) says:

Double Jeopardy

I don’t know about english law, but the reason you can sue someone in civil court after they have been found innocent in Criminal court is that the standard of proof is lower (preponderance of evidence as opposed to beyond a reasonable doubt). Courts view civil trials as an entirely new liability and so do not view them as being tried twice for the same crime.

isaac Kotlicky (profile) says:

Re: Re: Double Jeopardy

But this isn’t an issue of double jeopardy – there is no question as to the “standard of evidence” – it’s an application of law: is providing a tracker service illegal or not? the law was interpereted as saying NO.

Ergo, “beyond a reasonable doubt” vs preponderance isn’t an issue – what he did was deemed LEGAL. you would need it overturned on an appeal.
Since it’s legal, it isn’t infringement, and you wouldn’t be able to get him whether civil or criminal.

They would have to attack him for a different charge entirely in order to mount a successful offensive, and I don’t quite see how they could do that in such a way as to take down the site itself.

lawKiller says:


ok does occasionally mean one song in 6 months for a period of two years
maybe i occasionaly grab a song too but that the total was two songs

YUP hard to say what you owe and ya know at least had balls to say it

and i think we need to start killing the courts with this and NOT PAY
thats right fucktard judges we aint paying
go ahead wreck everyone’s lives and one day when we get called terrorists cause we start killing off the fucking lawyers and judges you will know why.

Anonymous Coward says:

“apparently punishing people is more important than actually coming up with business models that work.”

That’s because they have no intention of coming up with a new business model. Funny thing is they actually believe that they can win a war of attrition with the internet and end up getting their own way. Unfortunately for them, I don’t think that they can hold out forever sooooooo…..

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...