IBM Patents Managing Your Patents

from the a-parting-gift dept

theodp writes “Before leaving a long IBM career last summer to head the USPTO, David Kappos managed Big Blue’s patent and trademark portfolios. Last Tuesday, the USPTO awarded U.S. Patent No. 7,630,915 to IBM for its inventive method of Managing an Intellectual Property Portfolio.”

Filed Under:
Companies: ibm

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “IBM Patents Managing Your Patents”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
16 Comments
angry dude says:

For once I agree with Mikey

This bullshit is gotta stop someday

IBM patents its own bullshit process for bullshit patent management approved by their former chief lawyer and now PTP director Kappos

Why nobody listened to Greg Aharonyan when he said that corporate stooge should never be appointed as PTO director, regardless of his abilities ?
Apparently this self-evident truth is beyond the reach of our lawmakers since they approved the SOB for the top PTO position

They made a mockery out of 200-year old US Patent System

No wonder every techdirt lemming-punk thinks all patent holders are trolls and scumbags

MLS (profile) says:

Re: For once I agree with Mikey

Having tried to find an application package that actually performs this type of work, and having had to deal with major drawbacks associated with every application implemented on a trial basis, if this approach can actually do what the patent suggests then sign me up for a trial.

Experience teaches that this is no small matter for companies with a large “inventory” of patent, trademark, copyright, etc., both domestic and international.

ChurchHatesTucker (profile) says:

Re: Re: For once I agree with Mikey

“Having tried to find an application package that actually performs this type of work, and having had to deal with major drawbacks associated with every application implemented on a trial basis, if this approach can actually do what the patent suggests then sign me up for a trial.”

Right, so it’s not the *concept* that’s noteworthy, it’s the implementation. We don’t need patents for that.

Leave a Reply to Anubhav Chattoraj Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...