Patent Hawk Files Supreme Court Brief On Behalf Of All Oregon; Oregon Officials Say 'Who?'

from the good-work! dept

You may recall that a guy named Gary Odom, who refers to himself often in the third person as “Patent Hawk,” has been known to stop by here every so often to insult us without ever, you know, backing up a point. His day job is helping companies do patent/prior art searches. Last year, he made a bit of news by suing Microsoft for a patent he held on “editable toolbars” (exciting stuff). Microsoft later accused him of violating a contract, in that Odom (whoops) had worked for Microsoft, and had an agreement about not filing for certain types of patents, or asserting them against Microsoft.

Now, with the Supreme Court agreeing to hear the Bilski case, which could have a big impact on the patentability of software and business models, a bunch of folks have been dutifully filing their amici briefs attempting to convince the Supreme Court one way or the other. These latest briefs more or less reflect what was in the original briefs filed prior to the CAFC ruling. Still, there was one interesting one: Odom and a buddy filed their own brief (which Odom, again in the third person praised his own brief as being “cogently potent in its brevity and conservatism” — nothing like patting oneself on the back).

The brief itself is fine (though I believe a bit misleading in what it leaves out… but that’s what these briefs tend to do). However, what stood out, was the odd claim on the brief that it was filed on behalf of the State of Oregon (where Odom resides). That’s quite a claim… and it appears the State of Oregon, in the form of its Attorney General, doesn’t agree with Odom that this represents the state:

Tony Green, a spokesman for the Oregon Attorney General, said no one in his office had heard of Odom’s purported statewide representation before [Joe Mullin at The Prior Art] called. “It is our preference that people accurately convey who they’re writing an amicus brief on behalf of,” says Green. “We neither authorized this or had any knowledge of it.”

Of course, Green also points out that the Supreme Court figured out that Odom’s claim to represent the State of Oregon was backed up with about as much weight as his typical insults, and properly filed the brief as just being from Odom and his friend, rather than the state of Oregon.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Patent Hawk Files Supreme Court Brief On Behalf Of All Oregon; Oregon Officials Say 'Who?'”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
HolaJohnny (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4 Really?

I’m going to have to petition the authorities on that trademark referencing prior art in the many bastards and smart asses who came long before we were born. Hitler was a bastard. And I’m pretty sure Ben Franklin was a smart ass as a boy… Either way its a excellent description to dub yourself with. I once had a coworker ask me if there was anything anyone could say to me without getting a smartass remark… I told him no, where’s the fun in that?

Anonymous Coward says:

Actually, Mr. Odom presented a very thought provoking brief (a brief that is surprisingly brief) that in my view, after having read the vast majority of the briefs filed to date, quite effectively presents the points he and his co-author are making in a concise and understandable manner.

With so many briefs basically hiding their points within long winded dissertations, it is a pleasure to read one that isn’t.

Mike says:

Smart guy, bad tactics

I’ve been impressed by some of the individual insights that come from Gary Odom, but this is par for the course with him. Everything I ever read seems to be inflamatory and I assume it’s meant more to create buzz and get a rise out of people, than to actually achieve something.

So my advice – take what he says with a grain of salt. The attacks are the norm and I usually don’t agree with his opinions, but there’s almost always something entertaining in what he has to say.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: stop the shilling!!!

masnick, you are a sniveling Microsoft boot licker.

I find this quite funny, since I pretty much disagree with everything Microsoft says about patents:

Not only that, but I’ve pointed it out to you guys before. So why do you keep insisting otherwise?

You don’t build credibility by stating stuff that is demonstrably false.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...