Judge Bars Sale Of Microsoft Word For Patent Infringement (Though It Won't Stick)

from the nice-work dept

Just last week, plenty of tech publications were up in arms over the news that Microsoft had apparently secured a patent on XML word processing documents (patent 7,571,169). Of course, when you live by software patents, expect to die by software patents… as a judge (in East Texas of course) has now issued an injunction against Microsoft, barring the sale of Microsoft Word because it infringes on a patent that involves (you guessed it) XML word processing documents.

The judgment against Microsoft in this case actually isn’t new. We wrote about it and the $200 million judgment back in May, noting how insane it was that the company holding the patent, i4i, felt that it deserved $98 for every copy of Microsoft Word ever sold. For what? Its patent, 5,787,449, is about XML editing of a word processed document. How that could be worth $98 per copy of Word is beyond me. Actually, how it’s patentable at all is beyond me… but that’s another story.

Of course, there’s about 0% probability that this will actually stop the sales of Word, but it’s ridiculous for Judge Leonard Davis to issue this injunction in the first place. As he well knows, the Supreme Court ruled in the MercExchange case that injunctions often don’t make sense in patent infringement cases. In that case, the Supreme Court says that a judge should weigh a variety of factors in determining if an injunction is reasonable. From the actual injunction, there’s no evidence at all that the judge weighed anything at all. However, he gave Microsoft 60 days to comply, which is ample time for Microsoft to appeal the injunction, and in such cases it’s quite common for the appeals court to stay the injunction.

But, honestly, the whole thing shows (yet again) how screwed up the patent system has become. The fact that a judge would ban all sales of Microsoft Word because it can edit an XML document? And that’s on top of a $200 million award for infringing on this patent? How can anyone think that’s a sane outcome?

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: i4i, microsoft

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Judge Bars Sale Of Microsoft Word For Patent Infringement (Though It Won't Stick)”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Frosty840 says:

Re: Re:

I can’t honestly see any other rational explanation.
Sure, there’s an offchance that Microsoft’s lawyers sat around and drooled for the whole case, but I’m pretty damn sure that they’d want to have pointed out that this guy can’t actually patent the concept of editing a file format that someone else invented…
Or can he? Is the system really that bad?

Anonymous Coward says:

Ignoring the “who” in the case, let’s look at the legal realities.

Company A makes a product that infringes the patent of Company B. Company B gets a ruling, which company A ignores. What is the next step?

The next step is clearly to get the sales of the product stopped, as they are infringing and unlicensed.

WHile you may or may not like the patent(s) in question in this scenerio, the reality is they company is doing what they are suppose to do.

topspeed (profile) says:


If this will prevent the use of the DOCX format then I’m all for it. MS tends to force useless file format changes which, in the corporate world, on messes-up the ability to share information. This can be helped with add-ons from MS but the non-MS products which read only DOC formats are useless. This ends-up costing companies many millions.

Well done i4i, I hope this will either shake-up the retarded US patent laws or make Microsoft eat its own dog food.

Patent Whire says:

Time to Patent

I serious need to patent the idea of using a device that has a processor and some sort of input device to create output.

I think that should cover just about every modern device… then I can get a judgement to stop the sell of EVERY electronic device!


The world won’t know what to do. There will be chaos and turmoil.

The World Will Look Up and Shout “Save Us!”

And I’ll whisper… “No.”

Hephaestus (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Yeah his stuff is to Hawaiian for me …

I prefer …..

I like the Ralph Lauren clothings from a visual POV. Ralph Lauren clothes created ripples among the fashion conscious immediately after the Ralph Lauren was launched. I like the Ralph Lauren clothing. Ralph Lauren is one of the most popular brands. Ralph Lauren clothing displays the brilliant work of Don Ralph Lauren. He is a gifted painter, printmaker and tattoo artist. Ralph Lauren offerings include
Ralph Lauren
Ralph Lauren swimwear Ralph Lauren clothes is just 4 years old and was launched by Audigier in 2004. There were many Hollywood stars who wear his Ralph Lauren clothing.
Ralph Lauren Christian Audigier, Clothing, Shoes, Shirts, Swimwear, Perfume, Hats, Purses, Dresses, Boots 50-75% OFF, Free Shipping WorldWide. Ralph Lauren ,Ralph Lauren shoes.
tiffany jewelry

….. LOL …. 32 seconds to copy paste and replace ….

This ad is in no way supported, endorsed, paid for, or approved by Ralph Lauren. Ralph Lauren is a registered trademark of Polo Ralph Lauren Corp. (RL).

I actually do like RL’s shorts.

Spectere (profile) says:

Hey guys! Newsflash!

To all of the Microsoft bashers above, don’t you realize that OpenOffice.org would infringe on the same patent that Microsoft Word allegedly does? It uses an XML-based document format as well.

Don’t be so quick to “ha ha” just because Microsoft is being brought to court. If lawsuits like this stick then everybody is screwed, not just the big players.

Spectere (profile) says:

Re: Re: Hey guys! Newsflash!

You’re making a pretty huge assumption that the company is going to turn a blind eye to someone who is infringing on their “patent” just because they’re developing a free, GPL licensed, office package.

The way I see this going down, i4i is going to get licensing fees from everyone that they possibly can. And considering OpenOffice.org was initiated by Sun Microsystems, you’d better believe that they’ll be next if they manage to get anything out of Microsoft.

Felix Pleșoianu (user link) says:

Still think it’s a good idea to be judged by people who are ignorant about everything besides the law? Especially when said law is already obsolete? A judge/jury who understands the issues they judge could at least try to reconcile reality with the spirit of the law, and pass a decent ruling. But as long as they’re deliberately chosen to be ignorant, expect the circus to continue.

Besides, how can the patent troll demand that MS pays for every copy of Word ever released? Those before 2007 don’t even understand XML. And the patent itself was filed in 2004. How can it apply to Word 2003 and previous versions?

Good to live in a jurisdiction that doesn’t have software patents.

Anonymous Coward says:

“Just last week, plenty of tech publications were up in arms over the news that Microsoft had apparently secured a patent on XML word processing documents”

If Microsoft’s patent is enforced and the judgment against Microsoft is ofterturned then that double standard shows who the patent system truly stands to serve, the rich and the powerful.

Anonymous Coward says:

“Just last week, plenty of tech publications were up in arms over the news that Microsoft had apparently secured a patent on XML word processing documents (patent 7,571,169).”

Wasn’t the purpose of XML to create open standards that are free of retarded intellectual property? After everyone has gone through ALL the hard work of doing this why the heck does Microsoft get to parasite off of the hard work into developing this (with the intent of not having stupid intellectual property get in the way of EVERYTHING WE DO) and get a patent off of this work? This harms innovation and creates a disincentive for people to create new innovations with the intent of them being in the public domain knowing that some stupid evil parasite like Microsoft might grab a patent on it.

detour says:

XMLOpen Document Format related MS Word Injunction

What a joke …

Word is that the “judge” is from an old school that believes in an “eye for an eye”.

Seriously though, accepting that he is simply passing the “buck” to an appellate jurisdiction which has greater authority and presumably more combined intelligence, how can our learned friends get it so wrong?

“Common good” if not “common sense” is plainly lacking … next case!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...