Australian Press Prints Movie Industry Myths About Piracy Funding Terrorism

from the does-skepticism-exist-down-under? dept

Isn’t the press supposed to actually investigate claims handed to them by industry lobbyists? Apparently not. A bunch of folks have sent in the fact that the Sydney Morning Herald has published a totally one-side and unsubstantiated article claiming that “movie pirates fund terrorism.” There are just a few problems with this — including the fact that the so-called evidence for this is weak or non-existent, and the only evidence that is provided comes directly from the movie industry itself, who has every incentive to push this ridiculous story, despite the fact that the movie business continues to have record breaking years at the box office, and attendance is way up this year so far — despite a massive worldwide recession.

None of that makes it into this article, by two supposedly professional reporters.

Instead, we’re told that “piracy” costs the Australian movie industry $233 million per year and “affects at least 50,000 workers.” Affects how? That we’re not told. As for the $233 million number, that comes from AFACT — the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft, hardly an unbiased party, though the gullible reporters seem to take its spokesperson’s words as gospel that cannot be questioned. About the only thing that said spokesperson, Neil Gane, can show as someone being impacted is that “the people who own the local DVD shop who are having to lay off staff.” Uh huh. And the people who own the local CD shop are doing so also — but it’s not because of “piracy” but because of competition. You know who’s staffing up, though? Apple stores and video game retailers… Hmmm… Why is it that AFACT doesn’t count their job growth in its numbers? I wonder…

Then there’s the claim from the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance’s director, Simon Whipp, claiming that all this piracy is impacting the least well paid people in the industry: “We’re talking about a group of people who earn an average wage of about $15,000 a year.” Honestly, all I can think is that (1) why is the industry paying people such crappy wages and (2) they’re probably a lot better off in other jobs then, where they might earn a bit more. I don’t see that as a problem of piracy. It seems like the movie studios aren’t paying those employees enough to keep them in their jobs.

From there, the article moves on to the absolutely ridiculous, promising to “show how movie piracy is being used to fund terrorist groups including Hezbollah and Jemaah Islamiah, responsible for the Bali bombings in 2002.” That would, indeed, be quite interesting, but the article fails to even come close. Instead, it talks about a guy in Sydney who camcorded some films and uploaded them to one of many online groups. What the article doesn’t mention is that the same films were almost certainly uploaded by numerous other people, and there’s a good chance that most of those films pretty quickly had official (non-camcorded) versions leaked online by industry insiders. But, wait, we’re supposed to be learning how this one guy’s movies are connected to terrorists.

But, we don’t. Instead, we find out that the movies he recorded (but no mention as to whether it’s specifically his recordings) showed up in Britain, the United States, Mexico, Spain, Malaysia and the Philippines. We’re told that the movies are manufactured and sold in the streets. That’s great, but it ignores the fact that, thanks to all this “online movie piracy” the whole “counterfeit DVD” business has been going downhill. In fact, if you must connect the sale of counterfeit DVDs to terrorists, then you should be happy for online piracy taking away that market.

Is any of this suggested in the article? Of course not.

But wait, weren’t we supposed to be finding the elusive missing link between movie downloading and terrorism? We were following the camcorded movie recorded by the one guy in Sydney, which showed up in other places… but there the trail ends cold. Instead, we’re told to just trust the experts. Ganes (quoted earlier) shows up again to claim: “It has been recognised by governments… that there is a link between movie piracy and terrorist funding.” Oh really? It has been recognized by whom? Only by a study funded by the MPAA which didn’t really talk about online piracy, but about counterfeiting, and which had numerous methodological problems. At least the article admits that the study was funded by the MPAA, but never considers that it may be biased because of this.

The article quotes the authors of the study, claiming: “If you buy pirated DVDs, there is a good chance that at least part of the money will go to organised crime.” Of course, organized crime is not the same as terrorists, but does the article mention that? Nope. It wants you to assume they’re the same thing. It also doesn’t discuss the declining sales of counterfeit DVDs.

But it does jump back to the Philippines, where local actor Eduardo Manzano has the definitive proof of the link to terrorists. It’s because he says so! “In this country, we have the triad, and we have terrorist organisations which are being suspected now of using profits derived from DVDs for possible terrorist activities.” Then, in dramatic fashion, the reporters discuss a raid on counterfeit DVDs, and from there we’re told that the guy who camcorded movies in Sydney didn’t get a big enough sentence.

Got it? With some gullible reporters, a lack of fact checking, questionable information, a lack of context, a total dearth of anyone who might question the bogus information put forth in the article, we have an article promising to show the link between piracy and terrorism that does nothing of the sort. Now who’s out there complaining again about how these professional reporters need to have special protection since they actually do real investigative reporting?

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: afact, mpaa

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Australian Press Prints Movie Industry Myths About Piracy Funding Terrorism”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
23 Comments
NO! says:

Re: The real truth...?

>Movie Studios Fund Terrorism!

Wrong! The Movie studios ARE terror! They are the worse form of organized urban terrorists. Their militant branch the MPAA, and affiliate terror organization the RIAA, have more victims than 911.

They go after the weak. They terrorize them. Bankrupt them. And then… move on to new targets.

When will the terrorism stop?

When we MAKE it stop.

Viva La Resistance!

Anonymous Coward says:

The problem is that “street piracy” is a huge issue, something that generate millions of dollars every year for the pirates. Being a frequent traveller to China and HK, I can tell you without a doubt that there is a huge amount of production of knockoff goods (including movies and music) and very strong resale market.

The numbers? Who knows? They are all estimates (from every side).

The truth is this: in any illicit business where there is a ton of money to be made, you will find organized crime. Many terrorist organizations get involved in organized crime as a way to finance their actions. You sort of have to have your head in the sand to think it isn’t happening.

YouAreWrong says:

low paid workers

The Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance’s director, Simon Whipp, who represents performers, said movie piracy ripped off some of the lowest-paid workers.

“It has a significant impact on performers and the film and television industry as a whole,” he said. “We’re talking about a group of people who earn an average wage of about $15,000 a year.”

If copyright is so great, then why are these guys getting paid so damn little? And if movies are grossing 100 million+ and these guys are getting paid so little, where is all that money going?

(these are rhetorical questions because these guys are full of shit)

Valkor says:

Re: low paid workers

These guys *AVERAGE* that? They make, what, $7.50 an hour? What’s the minimum wage in Australia, anyway?

Let’s try to think of minimum wage jobs affected by piracy:

DVD cardboard box folders
DVD shrink wrap machine maintenance workers
Movie theater floor sweepers… No, theaters are doing fine.
DVD price sticker attachers

Anything else?

BullJustin (profile) says:

organized crime

The studios are only mad about organized crime selling counterfeit dvds because it impacts their (dying) cash cow. organized crime has simply recognized the same racket the studios have been using – an artificial scarcity caused by a bottleneck in distribution. Remove that artificial scarcity and there is no profit motive for organized crime or terrorists. Seems like these reporters missed a great opportunity to point out how all the “illegal” downloading has helped fight terrorism and the mob at the same time.

Anonymous Coward says:

And that’s one of the problems– Australia still exists under a British Coat of Arms.

Of course, you have to consider the deliverer of such news: Perhaps the largest media owner in the country: one “sir rupert murdoch” (lower case on purpose.) played a part in this.

It’s possible that in his dealings with the US and disgust of his failing MySpace investment, that he’s seen and re-developed a British-Friendly ideology regarding property and ownership rights as they are used for economic exploitation.

I wouldn’t be surprised if other British Commonwealths are also asked to tow this misguided line, and asked to do the same.

Where’s Nicolas Sarkozy? He should know this fully.

Additionally, we should look at putting Hawaii back on the Table. Puerto Rico can take it’s place.

Hugh (profile) says:

Funding terrorism??

By this argument, it’s better for the country if I download the movies myself rather than buying from some dodgy shop in Chinatown. That way I’m not funding terrorism (unless my ISP kicks into their fund somehow), and I still get the movies I want.

Maybe AFACT should drop their action against iiNet since people downloading their own content is in the country’s interest 🙂

Igor Zevaka says:

It’s interesting that the people behind the “piracy funds terrorism” claims want us to leap to conclusion that not buying the pirated item will stop the terrorism. Even assuming that the claims are 100% true are we to believe that terrorism exists solely because it can be funded by counterfit DVDs?

Surely not, I mean, there are many reasons for terrorism existing in the modern world, and its definitely not because terrorist can find money for it.

tim says:

oh my god

hahahahaha reading the ‘six degrees of separation’ thing actually had me laughing out loud. But you know, the target audience of old farts who believe anything they read in the newspaper is going to lap this up, and because australia is pretty much one big retirement village now, the polititians will have to try to win the old vote, and some ridiculous law is going to get passed.
I hate polititians.

Reality bites (profile) says:

Ever looked at the quality?

Even a small child would be outraged at the utter crap they try to sell, they are un-watchable.

The fact that the movie industry conveniently forget…. why are they always able to seize 100,000’s of pirated dvd’s… because no one buys them so there are always plenty to seize.

Just more lies and distortions from those that really do steal from the artists, the Shylock movie distributors.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...