The Guardian Follows The NY Times In Making News A Platform

from the good-job dept

A bunch of folks have been sending in the wonderful news that the Guardian, in the UK, has opened up an API and is sharing data in such a way that others can build programs on top of the news. This is fantastic — and follows on a similar move last month by the NY Times. It appears that both the NY Times and the Guardian really are pushing the boundaries of recognizing that being an online newspaper these days needs to be about a lot more than delivering the news.

Perhaps even more interesting (though, getting much less attention) is the companion bit of news from some editors at the Guardian — who are pointing out that they hope and pray each day that the NY Times gives into temptation and starts trying to charge for news… because it will create a huge opening for the Guardian to create a much larger online audience. This is what plenty of people have been pointing out for years: if clueless newspaper execs decide to start charging for news, it just opens the door wide for smarter news organizations to stay free and accumulate a much larger audience.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: ny times, the guardian

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “The Guardian Follows The NY Times In Making News A Platform”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
JTW (profile) says:

free is nice but not sustainable

I love the concept of free news, but it’s not a sustainable business. There just aren’t enough banner ads to support that kind of a model. Newspapers need ads that actually perform, or some kind of subscription revenue for continuous usage.

The only two models I’ve seen that make sense are the “Basic Cable” ESPN 360 model, or the “ads or cash” Ultramercial model.

By racing to be the freest we just won’t have newspapers anymore – not as Web pages, brands or even APIs. Only NPR.

Eclecticdave (profile) says:

Re: free is nice but not sustainable

You should probably mention to Google that an ad revenue model is not a sustainable business!

OTOH you’re right about one thing – generic banner ads have a lousy click-through rate. Newspapers need to wise up and make the adverts both relevant to the content and targeted to the demographic of their readers.

For example is running with the German school shooting story as the lead today – and apparently if I stay at a Crown Plaza hotel for three nights I only have to pay for two! Not particularly relevant.

Admittedly this might not be the best example – any relevant ad against this sort of story runs the risk of appearing tactless. But I doubt they have any strategy in place for matching ads to stories.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...