Do Google's Patent Lobbying Efforts Matter In Patent Infringement Suits Against The Company?

from the hard-to-see-why dept

Google, of course, is on the receiving end of numerous patent lawsuits (and the number seems to keep growing). In one, brought by Erich Spangenberg’s Bright Response LLC (you may recall Spangenberg’s name from the fact that he recently was told to pay $4 million for violating a settlement in one of his other patent lawsuits, where he promised not to sue the same companies over the same patents), the patent holder is demanding Google turn over all information concerning its lobbying efforts on patent reform. As Google notes in response, its lobbying efforts on patent reform have absolutely nothing to do with whether or not there’s any infringement on automatic message interpretation and routing systems — a patent, by the way, that the EFF has designated as one of the ten worst patents out there.

This seems like a pure fishing expedition to (a) try to create more work for Google for no good reason and (b) have a well-known exploiter of the current patent system get access to what patent system reformers are talking about in DC. It has no bearing on the case one way or the other, and hopefully the judge agrees.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: bright response, google

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Do Google's Patent Lobbying Efforts Matter In Patent Infringement Suits Against The Company?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
5 Comments
DanC says:

Re: Re:

most Americans treat the judge’s opinion as much more definitive than yours, you can disagree if you want but nobody cares

While I’m almost certain I’m feeding a blog troll with this response, it would seem that you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. People disagree with judges all the time – that’s why there’s a court system with an appeals process in place. And even beyond those directly involved with a case, public opinion can (and often does) disagree with a judge.

You are apparently of the opinion that if you don’t happen to be a judge then no one should take your opinion on legal matters seriously, which is quite honestly idiotic.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »