More Reasons To Go To The Movies: Next Iron Man In IMAX And 3D

from the can't-get-that-at-home dept

We’ve been pointing out how the movie industry appears to finally be realizing that they need to give people a reason to go out to the movies, now that they’re competing with home theaters, and many are doing that by making use of things like IMAX technology that simply can’t be reproduced in the home yet. Now, Parker Mason notes that the next version of the movie Iron Man is supposedly going to be in both 3D and IMAX — again, trying to give people real reasons to actually go out and see the movie as a social experience. It’s nice to see the industry recognizing this, though it would be better if the rest of the industry stopped freaking out about piracy and DRM and put more resources into giving people reasons to pay.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “More Reasons To Go To The Movies: Next Iron Man In IMAX And 3D”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

i have no problem going to the movies in their normal format. my friends and i very much enjoy, the issue at hand is that it costs us a fortune to do so! it is a social experience and it’s also a… well, theatrical experience. I’m not going to go home and pay hundreds to thousands on high def projectors that are equally as good as movie projectors and then pay another fortune for the movies – the amount of money spent actually going to the theatre throughout my life is a lot less than going down the alternate route…
it’s just that now that going to the theatre is so expensive, and an average drink there costing 5 dollars, we just do without. It’s just a luxury, not a necessity, and it’s one most people can do without given the prices.

Glurbie says:

Still a band-aid

There are already several 3D displays for the home that can be watched by a room full of people with no one having to wear silly glasses (other than maybe they’re own prescription glasses). The displays are still too expensive for the average user, and ancillary equipment support is lacking too. But, if Hollywood places significant emphasis on 3D movies, that may increase consumer demand for the home theater versions and improve that market. Personally I would love to see that happen so I can someday have a 3D game console, but Hollywood should realize that pushing 3D can only buy them time.

Some displays:
4D-vision (Dynamic Digital Depth)
Philips WOWvx
Dresden D4D
Lightspace Depthcube

A search for “autostereoscopic display” will find more.

crystalattice (profile) says:

Still not interested

I stopped being interested in movies when Hollywood decided that the “only” movies they will make are based on comics, cartoons, and video games. I know there are other movies out there but the vast majority look like “do-overs” of previous films or rehashed ideas. There just hasn’t been anything interesting in the last few years.

Not to mention the over-reliance of computer graphics; they still look fake. Sorry, but no amount of rendering can make a spaceship look like a physical object. Compare the original Star Wars with the prequels. Personally, I like the original trilogy because they used models; they “looked” real on the screen, even if you could tell they were models. The prequels just looked fake.

So, long story short, I’m boycotting Hollywood until they make original movies and stop relying on special effects.

NotBob says:

The other theatres

I had a great time over Labor Day weekend when a group of us went to a triple header–at the drive-in. Not many of those around but over in the Lexington/Columbia South Carolina area they still have one, actually two side-by-side. We paid $3 a head to watch Hancock, Iron Man, and Dark Night. To bad I’m in the Northwest and was visiting family, I’d go again.


neil says:

hmm i will go to the movies to see imax and 3d until i can buy a home theater system that allows me to see imax sized screen and 3d effects then i will not pay for the content anymore.

it seems to me the best drm the industry can use is the good old safe method abstinence. they only let you see it in theaters, then they lock it away for like 3 years and bring it back out, never releasing it onto dvd or any other media. so the best copy you can get is telesync riped from the theater it whould boost movie theater ticket sales.

hegemon13 says:

Re: Re:

The best? Sorry, but that would be the end of the movie industry. DVDs generate publicity for sequels, movies by the same director or starring the same actors, etc. DVDs of good movies are advertisements for new movies. For example, how, exactly, would you expect to drum up publicity for Iron Man 2 when no one can see Iron Man?

Besides, what a silly philosophy. “We can’t make as much money as we want to because people are pirating our DVD, so let’s not sell the movie at all, and then we can make NO MONEY!” Brilliant!

Ferin (profile) says:

Big atraction now

The funny thing to me about this is for so long IMAX screens were such a damn waste. One of the local theaters here in columbus got rid of their projector and just offer it as a really huge normal screen now, and now they’re kicking themselves because all these movies are suddenly switching over to draw more people in to see it in theater.

I wonder if the theater asscociation will pitch a fit about hollywood cutting into their profits by forcing them to switch over?

anonEmouse says:

one of the biggest reasons I no longer go to movies doesn’t have that much to do with the movies themselves. IT’S THE RUDE PEOPLE!!! Usually teenagers who don’t care about anyone but themselves in the theaters and won’t shut up. Also, people who feel the need to bring their 6 month old to a 2 1/2 hour movie. Of course the kid is going to start crying. People who can’t bear to turn off their beloved cell phone lest they become disconnected with whomever. People that reek of cigarette smoke. etc etc etc etc
That is why I’m happy to stay at home in front of my large screen, laying on my nice couch, drinking a drink that didn’t cost me $5.00 and not having to put up with people. You know who you are.

James says:

Awesome! Love IMAX!!

This is great, I’d much rather go to the IMAX theatre, yes it does cost more (about $15) but the sound and picture are better and I’ve found (at least in my experience) that there seems to be less talking and rude/annoying behavior. Maybe thats because the ones who balk at paying more to see the film are also the idiots who check their cellphone during the film. Fine with me.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...