Garfield Minus Garfield Gets Its Own Book… And No Lawsuits, Either!

from the amazing dept

Back in June, we noted how sad it was that we were all so happy that Garfield creator Jim Davis didn’t freak out about the derivative comic strip “Garfield Minus Garfield.” In this day and age, we’re so used to creators sending out cease and desist letters and claiming “ownership” that it was refreshing to see a content creator actually happy about someone building (or, in this case, subtracting) off his work. This should be the norm — but instead it’s a unique thing. Witness the silly spat over who “owns” Flat Stanley, for example.

However, the Jim Davis/Garfield thing is getting even better. It appears that Davis’ publisher, Ballantine Books, has worked out an agreement with the creator of Garfield Minus Garfield to publish a book of those strips as well, and they’re doing it in conjunction with a 30th anniversary Garfield book. And, once again, Jim Davis seems thrilled about the whole thing:

“I think it’s an inspired thing to do. I want to thank Dan for enabling me to see another side of Garfield. Some of the strips he chose were slappers: ‘Oh, I could have left that out.’ It would have been funnier.”

I look forward to a day when the idea that someone being thrilled that they inspired someone else’s creative works as a derivative of their own isn’t newsworthy. In the meantime, kudos to Jim Davis, Ballantine… and, most importantly, Dan Walsh for his creativity in coming up with Garfield Minus Garfield in the first place.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: ballantine books

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Garfield Minus Garfield Gets Its Own Book… And No Lawsuits, Either!”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
25 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Nice...

It took Scott Adams long enough. Back in the 90’s, people used to be able to link direct to dilbert because the webpage used the same URL for the current dilbert. Then they changed it so that there were random numbers placed afterwards, so someone wrote a script that would scrape the dilbert page and get all the numbers for the latest week of dilbert comics and he had them displayed on one page. This was especially useful back then because the vast majority of people were on dialup and it was nice to be able to load one page. But he was forced to take it down.

Ima Fish (profile) says:

Re: Re:

“Easy to ignore, because it is parody.”

While I have no doubt that at least some of the Garfield without Garfield comics would constitute a parody of the original work, that would not exempt them from copyright infringement because they use the actual copyrighted work. Thus, the Garfield without Garfield comments are true derivative works.

In the same way, I couldn’t remix Metallica songs to take away the guitars, without violating Metallica’s copyrights.

Thus, the cool thing here is that Jim Davis simply does not care about the infringement and is embracing it.

wasnt me! says:

too soon to call it victory

easy to ignore for the time being since Garfield Minus Garfield is still unknown.

Hasbro only went after scrablous once it realized it couldnt compete with it.

WWF (world wildlife foundation) only went after WWF (word wrestling federation) when the later became so popular.

the list goes on.

concerning Flat Stanley the original author had no issues with the teacher he actually realized that if it wasn’t for him flat Stanley would be dead, its only after his death that this all started but again when the website became so popular ….

CopyPirate says:

Re: too soon to call it victory

“Hasbro only went after scrablous once it realized it couldnt compete with it”

I think Hasbro only went after Scrabulous after EA came to them and said “hey your missing out on a bunch of money here, let us handle everything and you just sit back and collect a check”. The entire situation “reaks” of EA to be honest.

“concerning Flat Stanley the original author had no issues with the teacher he actually realized that if it wasn’t for him flat Stanley would be dead, its only after his death that this all started but again when the website became so popular ….”

I believe the problem here is the teacher attempted to get the name copywrited (or trademakred?) and the family said “hey just a minute now . . . “

Ouch says:

He gets it . . .

Jim Davis obviously really owns his IP (he is not listening to some giant publisher convincing him he is being robbed here) and he also can obviously appreciate not only its monitary value, but more importantly its entertainment value. My favorite quote on this subject still comes form the great Jerry Garcia (founder of the worlds first Billion dollar entertainment act). After being asked why he didnt mind fans taping Greatful Dead shows (considered unthinkable in the industry at the time), Jerry responded; “once Ive played a note Im done with it, let the fans have it.” Jim Davis gets this and is likely to enjoy the same loyalty and love from his fans because of it. Hell Im thinking about getting a garfield calander now for my little niece!

lauren brenner (user link) says:

an arbuckle thanksgiving...

So I saw something that’s totally on the same page as this. Some guy digitally removed Garfield from the entire Thanksgiving special. It’s called An Arbuckle Thanksgiving. You neeeeed to see it. It’s rediculous.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_KVsQXeE6A

The same guy did one for the Christmas Special too. The endings are amazing too. I can’t believe someone took the time to do these…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...