Jim Prentice Wishes People Wouldn't Be So Specific In Their Questions Over Canadian Copyright Law
from the wouldn't-life-be-better-if-we-were-all-vague-in-our-criticisms? dept
It would be mildly amusing to watch how Canadian politician Jim Prentice was squirming away from any serious discussion around his new copyright bill, if it weren’t such a serious issue. After Prentice was forced to delay the bill originally planned for late last year, he promised to consult with all parties before coming out with a better bill. He did not. Instead, he just kept waiting, making minor changes, and then announced the bill at a time where he hoped it wouldn’t garner that much attention. However, it has received plenty of attention from people asking a bunch of questions, and Prentice’s response has hardly been compelling. If anything, he’s made it abundantly clear that he doesn’t want to actually discuss the specifics.
Michael Geist discusses the various tactics Prentice has used to avoid actually dealing with the massive shortcomings of the bill, including hanging up on radio interviewers and now saying that he won’t answer the questions being raised until it’s debated in Parliamentary committee. But, perhaps the most ridiculous of all is that Prentice’s chief of staff is complaining that the complaints and questions about the bill are “too specific.” Apparently, they were hoping for vague questions that could be brushed off with vague answers. Unfortunately, an awful lot of people (not, apparently, including Prentice) understand the terrible impact this bill would have and would like him to respond to those concerns. Prentice, apparently, doesn’t like that line of “specific” questions and will hide behind the Parliamentary committee (and his ability to hang up) rather than answer them.