Sprint And Affiliate Sue Each Other Over Legality Of New WiMax Effort

from the bad-blood dept

In certain markets, Sprint has always used affiliates to sell its service, rather than building out its own efforts. Some of those affiliate relationships caused problems back in 2004/2005 when Sprint merged with Nextel — as Nextel’s service existed in some of those markets, potentially “competing” with the Sprint affiliates who had agreements that Sprint would not compete directly. So, with the new WiMax joint venture with Clearwire, Sprint knew that the big affiliate iPCS would be upset. In fact, last week, Sprint sued iPCS in Delaware seeking a declaratory judgment that the new joint venture did not break their agreement with iPCS. That lawsuit appears to have been filed slightly before iPCS filed its own lawsuit in Illinois against Sprint. Chances are the two suits will be combined in some manner, but it’s yet another hurdle that Sprint needs to clear before it can get this new WiMax offering off the ground. Sprint may have a decent claim here — as the agreement with iPCS is focused only on 1.9GHz spectrum, whereas the WiMax network is on 2.5GHz spectrum. Either way, it seems like these affiliate relationships may be a lot more pain than they’re worth.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: clearwire, ipcs, sprint

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Sprint And Affiliate Sue Each Other Over Legality Of New WiMax Effort”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
alaric says:

iPCS might have a good case too

Depends on how they defined exclusivity and if it was beyond the band (1.9 ghz) to include services.

Clearwire effectively means that sprint will not seek to evolve its cdma network for at least a while (i think they have to do LTE personally) and that sprint and the affiliates could lose customers to Clearwire.

I’m sure that’ll make for good legal points.

Ari Zoldan (user link) says:



I have been reading your posts for a while now, and i appreciate the time and effort you put into it. I always look forward to your next post to hear your opinion and input. I myself do a blog about WiMAX and was very interested in this particular post. I have a blog site – http://www.goingwimax.com.
Please comment on the website about how you feel about WiMAX and the site. If you would ever like to do some link exchanging, I would love my blog viewers to check out this site. Feel free to contact me!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...