More Lawyers Want To Get The Troll Tracker In Court

from the shutting-up-a-valuable-voice dept

Last month, we noted that Rick Frenkel, who for months had been the anonymous “Troll Tracker,” was being sued for defamation for some of the posts on his blog. Now, it appears that another set of patent attorneys that Frenkel wrote about are trying to get him into court. This concerned the rather infamous case of a patent attorney at a large law firm who got his own patents, and then used them to sue companies who were clients of his own firm for patent infringement. The lawyer in question, Scott Harris, is represented by Niro Scavone, who was another target of Frenkel and whose named partner not only proudly claims that the term “patent troll” was based on him, but also put out a bounty to anyone who could identify the Troll Tracker.

So why is Frenkel being dragged into the Harris case? Apparently Harris and his lawyers are trying to build a big conspiracy theory around Frenkel. Because Frenkel worked at Cisco, and Harris’ former employer (Fish & Richardson) did work for Cisco, Frenkel’s blog posts really were just a big plot to help out Fish & Richardson while devaluing Harris’ patents. That sounds pretty far-fetched by any stretch of the imagination, and would require an awful lot of proof. But, what’s most likely really happening is that the folks that Frenkel helped shed some light on are now taking advantage of the situation to drag him into court whenever and however possible.

This is quite tragic for a variety of reasons. No matter what one thinks of Frenkel’s anonymity while working for Cisco, you cannot deny that he brought to light many of the shadier tactics being used by patent hoarding firms, often hiding behind shell corporation names and suing many companies at once. Since Frenkel stopped blogging, many of those stories are remaining underground. No one has stepped into the void, unfortunately, perhaps afraid that they, too, will become targets in various lawsuits. The information that Frenkel was bringing to light (while potentially biased by his position at Cisco) did help point a light at some questionable activities that had been hidden for far too long.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: cisco, fish & richardson

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “More Lawyers Want To Get The Troll Tracker In Court”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
18 Comments
angry dude says:

poor clueless techdirt lemmings

Heck, do you guys really believe that “Patent Troll Tracker” blog was a sole undertaking of poor little Rick Frenkel ???
Just give me a freaking break

Mark Chandler, Cisco’s senior legal VP and Rick’s boss used some of those PTT blog articles while campaining on patent “reform” down in Wash DC
Do you really believe that he didn’t consult Rick on at least some of those “articles” ?

Now, Rick made a crucial mistake: being a senior corporate legal councel in charge of that partucular ongoing litigation against his corporate employer (ESN vs Cisco) he dared to post some outrageous lies about the opposing party’s legal counsels, accusing them of gross misconduct (he made a statement in his blog implying that those attorneys conspired with EDT court clerk and falsified court filing dates)

“Thou shalt not steal”
“Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour”
Amen

Joe Smith says:

Re: poor clueless techdirt lemmings

The fact is that the filing was re-dated and the result was that an invalid law suit became valid. The Court says that it was just the correction of a clerical error – it still looks darn bad and deserved some raised eyebrows and skeptical comments.

Whether or not other people at Cisco had some input into the blog does not change the facts with respect to Harris: either Harris bought patents and sued the clients of the firm where he was a partner or he did not. If you believe in the existence and importance of objective reality that is the issue around Harris.

If I were Cisco and I found out that a partner at my law firm was suing me for patents he had acquired for his own account I would pursue a scorched earth policy against the lawyer and the law firm. But that’s just me – you might be a milder mannered and more forgiving and moderate personality.

angry dude says:

screw Cisco

“If I were Cisco … I would pursue a scorched earth policy…”

Perhaps you should know that “scorched earth” litigation is the only policy Cisco has towards those outside inventors and smaller tech companies asserting their valid patents against Cisco

Sort of: “We respect intellectual property of others, but your patent happens to be invalid, not infinged, unenforceable and btw, we don’t even want to read you farking patent”
Yep, that would be Rick and his Cisco bosses

Anonymous Coward says:

The only thought that comes to mind is that if what has been published is true then there are some very dumb people out there.

It should be obvious to any half ass teckie that anything published on a web site can be tracked.

It should likewise be equally obvious that any action that offends any lawyer will result in a court case in a most unfavorable location.

Given these two observations and given that this is Cisco then one can only conclude that there are some really dumb people out there.

Anonymous Coward says:

Niro’s bounty went beyond the bounds of decency.

Niro deprived Frenkel of hid due process rights.

Do you think the judge is going to act? I don’t.

What can we do? Write Congress and ask our representatives to impeach the judge? The judge has condoned Niro’s bounty. The judge is morally guilty. The judge ought to be impeached.

Norman DiPlume (user link) says:

Troll Tracker is a brilliant guy.

I’ve known the Troll Tracker for many years. I know for a fact that he began the blog on his own because he truly believed in the position he was advocating. TT is one brilliant guy and really did research, write and publish the blog on his own time. He never spent a minute on it while at work. I guess that some of the parties now in pursuit of TT got their backs up because he cast some pure white light on their practices. This guy was courageous and deserves praise, not scorn. Has anyone noticed that those supporting TT with comments, on this and many other blogs, are those who’ve come up with facts and logic? Those opposed have been incredibly sophomoric and unprofessional at times.

LawStudent says:

I guess I just don’t see what is wrong with a small private company owning patents and asserting their rights.

One of the first things you learn in property class is that ownership gives the right to exclude. IP, in the sense of the right to exclude, doesn’t seem any different than real property other than you can’t physically build a fence and keep people out. In IP (sadly enough) you have to show people that they are infringing (or tresspassing if you like references to real property). I just don’t see how it is okay for a company who makes a product to violate the property rights of someone who doesn’t make a product.

Above is some discussion of shady dealings with a F&R lawyer — I’m not condoning that, I’m simply posing a more academic view on the issue of “are patent trolls really that bad?”

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...