Would You Believe People Trust Their Real Friends Over Bloggers?

from the oh-my! dept

In what may be one of the most pointless studies done in quite some time, a research firm has discovered to its own amazement that people tend to trust their own friends more than well known bloggers. Well, I should certainly hope so. Were there really people out there who thought that folks with high trafficked blogs actually held more sway than a personal friend? This is really nothing more than a retread of a (much more academic) report back in January noting that so-called “influentials” don’t really have very much influence. What that study found was that “word of mouth” works, but where those recommendations come from tend to be somewhat random. So things bubble up from everywhere, rather than starting with well-known bloggers. This shouldn’t be surprising to anyone, but after a few years of ridiculous media coverage suggesting that top bloggers have influence, it’s nice to see a few reminders that influence is a much more democratic system.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Would You Believe People Trust Their Real Friends Over Bloggers?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: I want to believe


Aside from that, it reminds me how amazingly strong the faith of an aithiest is. If there IS a God of some sort, he must have a sense of humor for that.

Personally, I prefer science. God may or may not exist according to science. There just isn’t any scientific proof of his existence.

And as the saying goes, absence of proof is not proof of absence . . .

Oliver Young says:

Read Write Web Coverage and Tipping Point

I was a bit surprised that the usually levelheaded RRW blog decided that this means “Malcolm Gladwell’s popular theory about key influencers moving markets may not be valid.”

Now I have not read the research like I should, but from what I can tell from the press release the report is indicting the idea that “popular” but unfamiliar people like Scoble can influece. Gladwell’s book is most focused on personal relationships.

Am I crazy, or are folks a little too eager to throw Gladwell under the bus?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...