Like $200 Million In Invesment Money Is Going To Make A Difference In Hollywood?

from the it'll-make-one-crappy-movie dept

We’ve discussed in the past the idea that Wall Street might start investing directly in movies, hoping that if that happened it would help kick the studios into realizing that their old model of doing things wasn’t working out so well. With that in mind, it’s not too surprising to hear that JPMorgan is planning to start investing in Hollywood, hiring some former Hollywood bigshots as advisors and setting aside $200 million for investments. Wait… $200 million? Isn’t that what Hollywood insiders falsely insist a good movie has to cost to make these days? In other words, isn’t that pocket change? It’s hard to see how that kind of money makes any difference at all in Hollywood unless JPMorgan is really planning to embrace the Silicon Valley model of making films, where less money is put to more efficient work. Hopefully, that’s where it’s heading (though, hiring those bigshots suggests otherwise). If it’s simply going to throw that money into the traditional Hollywood machine, it seems quite unlikely that it will last very long or go very far.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: jpmorgan

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Like $200 Million In Invesment Money Is Going To Make A Difference In Hollywood?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

They've already been doing this for ages...

… two of my friends are investment bankers for major firms and specialize in movie/entertainment financing and have been doing this for at least 10 years. It’s usually mezzanine financing against future earnings, which is very similar to what VC’s do, but with different terminology and much larger amounts.

There’s even a Wikipedia page about how it typically works:

And it’s not just for films, a lot of musicians have mezzanine-style financing against future royalties. David Bowie pioneered this approach almost 20 years ago.

Nick (user link) says:


200 million sounds like they are just testing the waters with that amount. They weren’t too stupid to understand mortgage securities, just greedy. The root of that problem was (and still is) giving the brokers their commissions upfront instead of over the life of the loan like with say, merchant accounts which pay residuals. Too many brokers talked too many people into bad loans to get paid right away, and none cared if customer could actually afford it. If their fee was paid over the life of the loan it would be in their interest to get a customer into a loan that they can pay off.
I personally wouldn’t invest in a movie production, too risky in a business that says they have to make back three times the investment in gross ticket sales (to pay the theaters and promotional costs) before they break even. Look at last weekend, movie receipts are half of the same time last year.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...