People Are Promiscuous In Their News Sources

from the good-for-them dept

One of the defenses that people often put up for newspapers’ dislike towards Google News is that newspapers don’t want “drop in” visitors. Instead, they want people who specifically read The Local Paper Times, or whatever, rather than randomdude23 who shows up from across the internet to read one story. So they want people who are going to go straight to their site, stick around and read many different pages. After all, this is exactly how newspapers used to work. Most people would subscribe to one, possibly two, local newspapers and then read a good portion of it (potentially, cover to cover). Unfortunately, however, that’s not quite how people consume news these days. A new study shows that people are rather promiscuous in their news consumption. They constantly divide their attention among many different news brands. This shouldn’t be surprising, considering how many news options people have these days, though it should also ease the worries of those that believe people get all their news from one source and therefore need to be “protected” from bias at that source. This “news promiscuity” is also a reason why news providers should go out of their way to cater to the needs of their readers, as it likely means that they’re constantly reshuffling their “news portfolio.” Therefore, doing things like making your content tougher to access — as the NY Times just did with the Freakonomics RSS feed — is only an invitation to lose readers to a more friendly source that knows it needs to keep its readers’ attention.

Filed Under: ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “People Are Promiscuous In Their News Sources”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
10 Comments
matt (profile) says:

yep

pretty accurate to me, sites like fark and google and digg, even msn and yahoo represent probably 50% of the internet users worldwide.

How these people even get paid for ads is beyond me, since almost nobody in their right mind even looks at ads as well even assuming that they aren’t blocked….which makes me question why people even put up such ads.

Reminds me of an article someone did a while ago where they showed a snapshot of a news site with and without ads (I think it was cnn.com)…and it looked GREAT without ads, and with them it was just a horrible jumble of navigation.

Jack says:

Critical thinking

One of the most effective methods of critical thinking taught in elementary school is ‘compare and contrast’. I’m sure individual newspapers would prefer that we subscribe to their publications and therefore their ideas, but in a world increasingly described in black and white, I would prefer to read a variety of viewpoints. Google News provides the best interface for choosing contrasting views that I have seen to date.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...