Judge Says Jury Screwed Up In Awarding Alcatel-Lucent $1.5 Billion From Microsoft For MP3 Patents

from the so-sorry-about-that dept

Back in February, a jury told Microsoft to pay Alcatel-Lucent $1.5 billion for supposedly violating some patents Alcatel-Lucent held on MP3 technology. The case helped highlight the patent thicket around MP3 technologies, as Microsoft had licensed the technology from the creator of the MP3 technology, Fraunhofer. Back in May, as the judge was considering what to do about the jury’s award, Alcatel-Lucent actually claimed that $1.5 billion wasn’t enough. It appears the judge not only didn’t buy that story, but didn’t buy the jury’s reasoning either. Today he threw out the jury’s ruling, noting that Microsoft doesn’t even infringe on one of the patents in question, and the other one is jointly owned by Fraunhofer, and therefore Microsoft has a legitimate license to it already. As the judge said, “The jury’s verdict was against the clear weight of the evidence.” As you might imagine, Alcatel-Lucent is not happy about this, calling the ruling “shocking and disturbing.” So, there is likely going to be a long appeals process. However, this is the second time in recent weeks that we’re seeing courts take a more reasonable approach on patents. Hopefully, it’s the start of a trend.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: alcatel-lucent, microsoft

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Judge Says Jury Screwed Up In Awarding Alcatel-Lucent $1.5 Billion From Microsoft For MP3 Patents”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

it’s a relief to see some reason and judgment being inserted into a process that has reached some impressive heights of ridiculousness. I applaud any judge who rules that just because someone holds a patent on “a covering shaped to fit the foot (below the ankle) with a flexible upper of leather, cloth, or plastic and a sole and heel of heavier material” doesn’t mean we should all start going barefoot.

Joe Smith says:

Re: Measure of justice

It’s nice that we’re seeing the courts take a more reasonable view of patents. It’s just such a shame that in this case the beneficiary is just about the world’s least deserving, most unsympathetic defendant: Microsoft. 😛

The measure of any justice system is its ability to give the Devil himself a fair trial.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...