And With Those 200 iPhone Patents Come The Inevitable Patent Disputes

from the nuclear-standoff dept

We’ve spent a fair amount of time discussing Apple’s decision to hype up the 200 patents it supposedly holds on technologies included in the upcoming iPhone. Initially, we wondered why they actually needed such patents — as it was hardly a protective measure. Try as they might, no other company is going to easily come up with a phone that has nearly the same brand factor that Apple can muster up from its fans. Furthermore, it’s been pretty clear that most of the “new” features seen the iPhone aren’t really that new. About the only explanation we heard that made sense for hyping the patents was to make up for the bad deal the company signed with Cingular, which will limit the distribution of the iPhone initially.


However, a second reason is becoming clear — and it’s (unfortunately) one of the most popular reasons for getting (and hyping) patents these days: nuclear stockpiling. That is, you want to have all these patents to hopefully ward off others with patents who will want to take a bite out of your success should your technology go anywhere. Already, we’ve seen claims from LG that Apple was copying an LG phone with its iPhone design. The latest, pointed out by Engadget is that Quantum Research, who has already sued Apple over the click wheel on the iPod is gearing up to sue over the touch screen interface, which it claims to hold patents on. “The description of the iPhone suggests it uses a rear-surface touch screen, and has proximity sensing which can tell if it is held to the ear. That’s a QR capability.” So now Apple can saber rattle back with its collection of 200 patents against anyone who claims infringement on it — and then hope that the threat of all out nuclear patent war leads the two sides to come to an “agreement.” It’s not efficient. It’s not good for innovation or progress… but it’s how the system works, and it’s why so many patent attorneys don’t want it to change.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “And With Those 200 iPhone Patents Come The Inevitable Patent Disputes”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
14 Comments
Andrew says:

The system works for two groups

The patent system works for two groups.

The first group is “the establishment” of players who each hold several key patents that are required to be part of the game. Only someone with key patents is able to be part of the club, because they can use them to halt the business of any of the others. Everyone else is kept out.

The second group are “IP trolls” who play a different game – halting businesses who play the game above. Since they don’t need the key patents to play their game, the establishment can’t block them.

Neither of these groups are interested in progress.

Luke (user link) says:

Penguins

I know that I innovate/change anything that I’m doing when I perceive that I’ll have to do less work after I’ve made the change. Or at least apply the same amount of work but seem to have to apply less effort.

Basically the lazy factor is the only reason I can see good inovation (the TV remote, the internet [porn comes straight to me now], microwave oven [yummy quick heated food], cars, searching for inane patents [Yay! Google!].)

Russ says:

False Logic

MAD only works where the other side has something to lose. It works for Sony, MS, HP and IBM.

For patent trolls, they have no products, therefore can’t get counter sued.

Sooner or later big business will realize this and change their approach. a few more NTP settlements and the true cost of the patent system will become evident. Now it is buried in overhead.

Search Engines Web (user link) says:

BREAKING: Cisco & Apple Settle iPhone Lawsuit

hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CISCO_APPLE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

The companies said Apple will be allowed to use the name for its sleek new multimedia device in exchange for exploring wide-ranging “interoperability” between the companies’ products in the areas of security, consumer and business communications

Search Engines Web (user link) says:

BREAKING: Cisco & Apple Settle iPhone Lawsuit

The companies said Apple will be allowed to use the name for its sleek new multimedia device in exchange for exploring wide-ranging “interoperability” between the companies’ products in the areas of security, consumer and business communications

hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CISCO_APPLE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...