Local TV Franchises Are For Chumps, Says The New Ma Bell

from the lawsuits-are-so-much-fun dept

Earlier this year, SBC realized that going around and convincing every local government to grant it a franchise license to offer IPTV was too much of a pain (with good reason). The company then announced that it was just going to ignore local TV franchises and offer service with or without them — and if anyone didn’t like it, they could sue. It appears that Walnut Creek, California hasn’t quite taken them up on their offer, but it has told them they can’t offer service without a franchise. So, (what’s now) AT&T has said if that’s the way it’s going to be, then they’ll be the ones to sue. They claim that they don’t need a cable license, because what they’re offering is “different” — a claim that would be a lot more credible if they didn’t make their IPTV offerings look so much like cable offerings. It seems that they’re at risk of the ever-popular (among politicians) “looks like a duck” test. If they had really offered something different, then they’d have a better case. Still, hopefully these (potential) lawsuits will cause people to revisit the question of whether or not local television monopolies make sense any more. Of course, if you take them away, then it only adds incentive for muni-broadband and muni-TV to help reach the areas that are under-served by the providers. So, AT&T may want to be careful what it wishes for.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Local TV Franchises Are For Chumps, Says The New Ma Bell”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
mds says:

Still, hopefully these (potential) lawsuits will c

what “local television monopolies” are you speaking of? can you id one city that granted an exclusive cable tv franchise? most cities want competitive video services.

just as rcn and others have obtained local franchises, there’s no reason the bells can’t too. the reality is they won’t roll out their service at once, it will be incremental. therefore the arguement for a statewide or national agreement is flawed.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...