How Many Keystrokes Should It Take To Buy Something?

from the maybe-they're-multi-tasking dept

In true Raymond Babbitt fashion, columnist Peter Cochrane has been out counting the number of keystrokes it takes clerks to punch into various points of sale systems — and the numbers seem way too high. Whatever happened to simplification? We’ve heard of computer systems that take fifteen steps to save a file, so perhaps 48 keystrokes to pay for a cup of coffee (with cash) is the new standard. Maybe in this Starbucks-obsessed world, there really are so many different options on a cup of coffee that it should take so long to punch it all into the terminal. Either that or the systems are connected to the internet, and the clerks are “multi-tasking” and instant messaging with their friends.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “How Many Keystrokes Should It Take To Buy Something?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
19 Comments
Matthew says:

So first people want choices...now they want it si

Okay…so first off, most people want choices and options. If they feel limited, they don’t like it. It really is not easy for a retail clerk to do their job and take dirt from rude customers and soccer moms alike. Really now, we should make their job easier and have the POS as a DIY terminal and let the customer confuse themselves…

Rikko says:

It boils down to companies not spending money on P

I’ve seen some pretty bloody awful POS systems in a variety of (large) retail environments. It’s unacceptable and just goes to show that companies aren’t really paying attention to their front line staff.

“No no, push F8.. Back up. Ok, now enter code ‘G’.. Then F6.. Then 4.. Now enter.”

“Ohhhhh”

When I was managing a tiny retail store I looked into several POS offerings and none of them really impressed me.

POS should be a horrific monstrosity to configure initially, and then be a breeze once it’s deployed. We’re still doing this all wrong.

Matthew says:

Re: It boils down to companies not spending money

If you want a good laugh…check out the POS at The Good Guys stores. It has not been updated since the 1980’s and still has monochrome monitors! Same deal with so many retial stores…they try so hard to cut costs, but could you imagine how much they would save with an intuitive system!?

Steve (profile) says:

Re: Re: It boils down to companies not spending money

I agree completely. Retail is famous for the “save money at any cost” mentality. I have worked with some of the largest and most successful in the world, and it is a common theme. In fact, the more successful they are, the more likely they are to live by the “save money at any cost” philosophy. Successful retailers have a procurement-centric culture and are driven so much by cost cutting through “better” procurement processes, that nobody seems to consider cost cutting and/or making more money through better system design and through better useage of those systems.

Rob says:

Re: Re: It boils down to companies not spending money

If you want a good laugh…check out the POS at The Good Guys stores. It has not been updated since the 1980’s and still has monochrome monitors! Same deal with so many retial stores…they try so hard to cut costs, but could you imagine how much they would save with an intuitive system!?

Probably very little. An intuitive system might save a few hours per clerk in training costs, but after the first day, the clerk would be up to speed, and there would be no more benefit.

IMOL says:

Re: Re: Re: It boils down to companies not spending money

Indeed. The largest problem with retailers upgrading their systems is the sheer scale of the upgrade – when you have 1000 stores with say 5 registers in each store, plus servers, networking hardware etc – then buying the new hardware to support a more modern POS system is the sticking point, not finding or developing the software.
Of course some retailers have the opposite problem – fewer stores but many more registers – the largest store I implemented a POS at had 168 registers in one store and several more with 80+.

fuzzmanmatt says:

Re: Re: Re:2 It boils down to companies not spending money

I have six registers in my store, one server, and five stores in town. We just finished upgrading to a POS from 1999 last year. It does its job, but it’s not good at it. I know how to manipulate it better than some of the tech support that I call, but for the most part it’s just like doing anything else with a modern OS.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2 It boils down to companies not spending money

>

It’s not always about speed. In some retail environments, like grocery – yes, absolutely – but then a grocery POS is thusly optimized and has many less functions than a specialty store POS.

In a more specialty store – the emphasis is on reasonable speed with high accuracy and lots of functionality like layaways, inventory lookups, returns etc.

lisa says:

No computer, no sale

Some time between 1965 and now, stores lost the ability to just trade merchandise for cash. If the computer doesn’t recognize the item or can’t scan it, then nobody knows what to do.

The worst part of this is somewhere along the line, consumers started to accept it. I was behind someone trying to buy something with a bar code the scanner couldn’t read. The cashier tried about 1,000 times, then called a supervisor who just kept rescanning, too. I moved to another line and about 10 minutes later when I left the store, they were still standing there trying to scan the stupid code.

I was leaving Wal-Mart once and the “stop thief!” alarm went off because the tag on my package of CD-R’s hadn’t been deactivated. They checked the slip to see I wasn’t a shoplifter then said they had to deactivate the tag.

I told them they were my CD-R’s now and my security tag and left.

Anonymous Coward says:

My Supermarket is very good

I shop at a medium sized super market, with probably five thousand of items. Checkout simply requires scanning of items (and coupons). If I pay with a card, I just have to run it through the card reader and sign the touch screen. Litterally the checkout person might hit one button on the cash register to start the transaction and one after they have scanned all items. After my card scan and I sign, the register automatically prints and cuts my receipt and prints one for checkout girl as a paper confirmation of the transaction and my signature. I am always very impressed!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: My Supermarket is very good

I completely agree. My supermarket and indeed most high street stores in the UK have no issue with processing various orders in a matter of seconds, or at worst minutes. This includes electronics retailers, clothes shops, supermarkets, gyms, etc.

Can anyone actually give me an example of where these systems really fall down and why? Preferrably an example from the UK.

Leave a Reply to Jose G Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...