Big Name Advertisers Tap Dance Around Accusations Of Supporting Adware Companies

from the just-'fess-up dept

Almost exactly a year ago, we wrote about plenty of big name companies who advertise on various adware networks, generally pissing off people who never wanted the ads on their computers. The Associated Press has pretty much written an identical article about well known companies that buy ads on adware networks. This one, though has some quotes from advertisers who all try to tap dance around the issue by again pretending that they don’t really understand why people hate adware. They all seem to say that they’re careful not to get involved with companies that spy on users. However, again, that’s not the biggest issue for most users. Instead, it’s the fact that the software is installed surreptitiously. That’s the issue that these advertisers don’t address — pretending that people are only concerned about the spying part, rather than slowing down their computer and filling up their screen with ads they don’t want.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Big Name Advertisers Tap Dance Around Accusations Of Supporting Adware Companies”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
nonuser says:

plausible deniability

This sounds similar to how file sharing networks operate, in that there are multiple tiers and diffused responsibility… the big names are shocked, Shocked! when the complaints roll in.

People should keep stuff like this in mind when they go after the RIAA and MPAA’s enforcement activity. Just because the digital era makes something technologically easy to do and almost impossible to shut down, doesn’t mean that behavior should be legalized. One could just as easily attack the reports of lost business and consumer productivity due to adware and spyware, as Mike and others have attacked the RIAA’s studies on lost profits due to file sharing.

Some things are just common sense.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: plausible deniability

“…how file sharing networks operate, in that there are multiple tiers and diffused responsibility…”

Tell that to the grandmother sued by the RIAA even though it was obvious she was not a Britney Spears fan. This diffused responsibility only seems to hold water when it is corporations and their associates. Who knows of a web site tracking what companies are using these slimeball marketers? Thanks to the magic of Firefox, I have not been infected with a single piece of this crap, so I really do not know who is currently using these companies…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...