More Ridiculous Hollywood Backed Laws In California

from the getting-greedy dept

The folks in Hollywood just keep on trying. Somehow, they’ve managed to convince California state politicians to sponsor some incredibly ridiculous pieces of legislation. They would require anyone who sent “commercial recorded or audiovisual material over the Internet” to include their name and address with the file. If they didn’t do this, they could face 1 year in prison and be fined $2,500. Ernest Miller takes a deeper look at the bills and the reason behind them. The whole point (obviously) isn’t to collect names, but to basically create a new crime (not giving your name/address) that would give state prosecutors jurisdiction in going after people file sharing. In other words, between the civil suits from the entertainment industry and the FBI there aren’t enough law enforcement types trying to stop kids from listening to music. He also points out that there’s no exception for fair use and there’s no exception for files that are completely legal to trade. Instead, you have to attach your name and address (even if you’re a child – who’s privacy should be protected by other laws) to any file you send. Hopefully, these laws aren’t going anywhere, but it’s scary that they’ve gotten as far as they have already.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “More Ridiculous Hollywood Backed Laws In California”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Rootman (user link) says:

How about . . .

the “culprits” also drive themselves to the nearest FBI office, turn themselves in, fingerprint, handcuff and jail themselves. Not only is this intrusive – as pointed out in the article – it’s ludicrous.

Kind of reminds me of Blazing Saddles when Clevlond Little held the gun on himself as a hostage. 🙂

Visit my homepage: – BORING! ;-}

ConceptJunkie (profile) says:


Why don’t we just give California to Mexico? It would increase the average common sense of U.S. citizens by 50%.

I thinnk we should also just rename the U.S. Congress to “Disney presents: The U.S. Congress”

I can’t figure out who’s the legislature over there: The California Supreme Court with its kooky non-sequitur rulings, or the MPAA/RIAA who simply have made the legislature their bitch (much like they have with the U.S. Congress).

Our system of government is being turned upside-down and no one seems particularly alarmed.

|333173|3|_||3 says:

Creative incompetence time

Q: Who transmitted that file?
A: Wat file?
Q: *file, date and time*
A: No idea. there are four of us who live here. Could have been anyone
Q: I want to see your logs?
A: What are logs?
Q: I want to see your logs
A: I don’t have any. I don’t know how to keep logs.
A: can I go now?

Wuld this come under some child protection act. This time, “Think of the Childern” is relevant, ans the link points out.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...