This Chatbot Catches Pedophiles
from the technology-on-the-prowl dept
We’ve written about kids teaching FBI agents how to chat online like teens to help catch unlike predators, and about how chat-bots are fooling lots of people – especially when they’re expecting something specifically. It sounds like someone has put the two ideas together, and has created a chatbot that tries to catch pedophiles. It goes into chat rooms and starts talking like an ordinary teen, but looks for classic symbols of an adult predator looking to find a child. If the chatbot suspects something is up, it sends an email to the bots creator with the relevant transcript. He then reads the transcript to see if the situation looks suspicious, and will then contact local police with all the info. He calls the various bots ChatNannies, and claims no one has figured it out and that it’s helped with police investigations (though, there’s no proof of either of these claims). As for staying relevant, the chatbot apparently tries to learn from the conversations it’s involved with, as well as surfing the web for other pop culture information. The article also includes a “sample chat” that seems fairly sophisticated for a bot – which actually makes me wonder how true it really is – though, I have kept up with the state of the art in chatbots lately. Are they really that sophisticated?
Comments on “This Chatbot Catches Pedophiles”
sophisticated
How sophisticated does a teen chatbot need to be, all it needs is a vocabulary of 500 words, the latest movie+music chart (including actors/singers) and prefix everything with “so like..” and throw in a “whatever” occasionally 🙂
And then...?
And then the police swoop in and arrest people for carrying on “illegal” conversations with a chat-bot?
Re: And then...?
It doesn’t matter if you’re chatting with a bot. If it can be proven that you ‘intended’ to prey on a child, that makes you guilty.
Re: Re: And then...?
whats ” proof ” Mike ?
It’s not even a human !
Re: Re: Re: And then...?
The proof would be in the transcription of the chat between the bot and the pedophile.
You don’t really think your words vanish off into cyberspace when they roll off the chat window do you? 😉
No Subject Given
I don’t know the chat bots discussed here in particular, but I have considered a double-blind approach to bots appearing “human” while sitting in a number of chat channels.
In this technique, the bot joins as person Alice on network A.NET, and as person Betty on a different network, B.NET. It picks a real unrelated participant on A.NET (we’ll call Annie) and parrots most of Annie’s speech on B.NET, so Betty says whatever Annie says. It likewise picks a random participant Bernice from B.NET and parrots most of Bernice’s speech as Alice on A.NET.
Once this blind is constructed, either Alice or Betty can add additional comments to goad conversations from their respective chat groups. If the bots detect directed questions, like “alice, a/s/l?” it can respond directly according to the bot’s goals, or it can just funnel the question to the alter-ego on the other network to fetch a genuinely produced reply from the real Bernice.
No Subject Given
what i want to know is if it could pass a turing test
No Subject Given
like that ex-Interpol guy David Race Bannon,(Race against Evil), its time to start killing child molesters. We need a mandantary death sentence for repeat offenders.(legal)