Judges Say Harlan Ellison Can Sue AOL For Usenet Postings

from the ugh dept

Nearly two years ago, I was surprised to find a legal decision I agreed with (they happen so rarely) where a judge had tossed out author Harlan Ellison’s lawsuit against AOL, saying that AOL, as a service provider, was not responsible for Usenet postings that contained Ellison’s stories. Note, these stories weren’t even on AOL – but on Usenet, available from just about every ISP out there. Ellison, though, has decided that it’s not worth understanding the technology when you can just sue and because he could see the posts on AOL, it must be AOL’s fault. Thus, he has continued fighting the case, to the point where he’s spent almost all of his money on the lawsuit. He insists that this is all AOL’s fault because it took them two weeks to respond to his request to block the Usenet posts in question. Unfortunately, it appears that my relief at a smart judicial ruling was premature. An appeals court has overturned the ruling and sent it back to the court, saying that AOL loses their DMCA liability protection because of the amount of time it took them to respond. In other words, DMCA protection against liability (one of the very few good things in the law) is limited by your response times to complaints. Ellison, continuing to miss the point, is declaring victory, but AOL is still confident they’ll win the case anyway.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Judges Say Harlan Ellison Can Sue AOL For Usenet Postings”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
1 Comment
Anonymous Coward says:

No Subject Given

Read the story a little closer. It’s only a partial overturn. What the court ruled, was that AOL did not follow it’s own procedure and thus is may be libel in this instance but it in no way impacts other ISPs.

This is how companies constantly screw themselves. They write up procedures and policies for themselves and then disregard them.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...