Can The DMCA Subpoena Provision Be Used For Good?
from the wrong-question dept
Jeremiah writes “Can my friend, being the rightful copyright owner of the musical works contained within his stolen PC, use the DMCA’s provisions to independently subpoena MSN’s connection records (to obtain the last known IP of his old PC) and the ISP’s customer information to find out where his computer is and recover it?” Interesting story and potential use. For all the evil uses of the DMCA subpoena provision, is this a good one? I’m not a lawyer, so take my comments with that in mind. The DMCA’s subpoena provision is supposed to be used by copyright holders to obtain information in a civil suit. The theft of the computer should be a criminal matter handled by the police – though, the police aren’t always so interested. More to the point, if he really does want to use the DMCA to subpoena the information why not file a John Doe lawsuit and then subpoena the information? The problem isn’t so much the subpoena itself – but that the subpoenas are issued prior to a lawsuit being filed and with little to no judicial oversight. Now, I’m sure some lawyers will come along and tell me I have no idea what I’m talking about. If you know more about the law than I do (lots of you, I’m sure) I’d be interested to hear your thoughts.
Comments on “Can The DMCA Subpoena Provision Be Used For Good?”
Interesting thought
Actually, you wouldn’t need to be a musician or whatever — if you have any letters, artwork or any original creations saved to your hard drive, it would be a copyrighted work in the sense that you do own copyright over it — even if it’s not registered.
It would be nice if there was at least one non-evil use of the DMCA…
No Subject Given
Wouldn’t the musician need to have a claim of copyright infringement? Since the person who stole the computer hasn’t done anything with the music contained on the computer, there doesn’t look like any infringement has taken place. THat would leave it as a simple case of theft and not covered by the DMCA. But again IANAL.