To Be Or Not To Be Transhumanist

from the playing-with-fire-or-making-life-better? dept

Toronto’s Globe and Mail is running a written debate (which is apparently a prelude to a live debate) between a medical ethicist and a transhumanist over whether or not we should be doing everything possible to extend our lives. The medical ethicist suggests that what the transhumanists want to do is making us less human (which I’m not sure the transhumanists would disagree with). Her general fear is that they will go “too far”. The transhumanist responds with a series of examples of other technology and medical breakthroughs that have made our lives better – and saying that if the opportunity is there, shouldn’t we take it? No matter what the debate on the topic is, it’s not going to stop people from researching ways to extend our lives – so shouldn’t we be more focused on making sure we understand and are prepared for the consequences of that research, rather than worrying whether or not it should be done at all?


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “To Be Or Not To Be Transhumanist”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
2 Comments
dorpus says:

Cultural Advantages?

Christian/Jewish/Islamic cultures believe in the sanctity of the soul, hence tampering with embryonic tissue is viewed as “unethical”. There are other cultures, e.g. China, where

1. religion is not a big deal, and
2. there are too many people anyway

if we make advances in organ transplant technology, could China turn into the world’s meat grinder?

There are anecdotal reports of people undergoing personality changes after receiving transplants. It’s hypothesized that latent viruses do affect our personality, hence transplanted organs innoculate us. We’ve found viruses that cause schizophrenia or other mental disorders, so it’s no surprise if there are other viruses that cause subtler changes, e.g. really liking the color green.

I wonder if we could have a second generation of biological weapons that induce mass personality changes?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...