Supreme Court To Hear Telemarketer Case

from the how-is-keeping-85%-of-the-money-not-fraud? dept

The Supreme Court will hear a case this week questioning whether or not a telemarketing company that only gave 15% of the money they raised to the charity they claimed they were supporting was committing fraud. Telemarketers, not exactly known for being the most trustworthy bunch say that if the court rules against them it will hinder their ability to raise money for charities. Say what? There’s a clear difference between a charity raising money, and a telemarketing firm tossing a tiny portion of the money they raise to a charity. If the telemarketing firm doesn’t make it clear that they’re going to keep 85% of the money you give them, then something is wrong. I realize that most people don’t know that many charity fund-raisers end up keeping a large percentage of the proceeds, but 85% goes beyond any reasonable line.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Supreme Court To Hear Telemarketer Case”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
AussieBruno says:

charity scam

If I knew only 15% of my donation was going to a charity there’s no way I’d contribute. Charities are poorly run as it is. The local Toys for Tots bunch a few years back spent so much on fundraising, i.e. VIP charity dinners, that when they were done raising money they discovered they’d spent more than they got in contributions. Except for what toys were donated, they had nothing to hand out for Christmas. The local Marine Reserve unit (who co-sponsors Toys for Tots locally) had to launch a drive to get people to donate toys. Charities wonder why people kick in less every year. This is why.

Anonymous Coward says:

No Subject Given

My own solution —

When the person at the other end starts the conversation with ” I’m a paid solicitor for …. ” I think they are required by law to do this and if a solicitor doesn’t start the conversation this way, I always ask.

Say, ” I don’t talk to paid solicitors ” and immediately hang up.

It’s unfortunate because I think I do hurt some charities this way but I’d learned a long time ago that paid solicitors keep the lions share of your contribution.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...