Eric Umeofia said that he would “rather die than allow someone to tarnish my image I worked 40 years to grow,” all while doing everything in his power to tarnish the image he worked 40 years to grow.
There was a time when Monster Cable was the bully, going after everybody who used the name Monster in any way. I think they even sued Disney for Monsters, Inc. So what happened? Did Monster Energy sue the Monster out of them and just swallow them? Those two seem like they should be fighting it out to the death.
“When the only way your case can last under even the most trivial legal scrutiny is if it’s in front of judges so insane, corrupt or both that silly things like ‘legal precedent’ and ‘constitutional rights’ go right out the window that’s a pretty big tell that your case is completely lacking in merit.”
But it fully explains why Elon filed the case in Texas.
I would think that you typically see application of the felony murder rule when the defendant is actually charged with committing a felony, like a robbery gone bad. Hard to see how it fits when the defendant’s crime was standing outside in public talking on a phone.
The prosecutor seems pretty gutless since it appears he’s unable to stand up to the police and say, “no, I’m not charging anybody for murder when the autopsy calls the death natural.” But it is easy to be hard core when the person on the receiving end of punishment has no standing in the community, just a pawn to be used in the quest to prove that you’re tough on crime.
“No, it’s a yes or no question. I’m going to be running out of time, so I’m assuming the answer is no if you can’t answer yes.”
So you're saying that if I look at your political positions and I like some of them but find others problematic, then I should vote for the other person. Got it. That is what you're saying, right Senator? It's a yes or no question.
Let's see. An asshole to women. Convicted tax evader. Mob ties. Ladies and gentlemen, say hello to new Republican Congressional candidate Nikko D'Ambrosio!
Ok, so does this mean that any person who files a lawsuit alleging discrimination on the basis of race, sex, etc., is also automatically liable for defamation per se?
“An allegation that the plaintiff has discriminated against another person or group because of their race, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity constitutes defamation per se”
“A quick look at mappinglasirena’s tumblr site would have proven that the blog was discussing a speed freighter not their client’s customer.”
So what if they were talking about the client’s customer? She’s been discussed here as well. So is this article infringing? Is that what DMCA Piracy Prevention thinks, that any mention of a client online is infringing? If so, they’ll be lucky to ever accidentally land on an actually infringing site.
“How dare you besmirch my good name by suggesting I was drunk or on drugs when I wrecked my car into another and killed two innocent people! I was completely in control of my faculties and not impaired in the slightest when I, uh, wait a minute . . . “
Well, fat-fingered a post before I meant to, but the part of the rant quoted in the article seems spot on. Maybe that's the problem. Maybe Bally Sports doesn't want to ruin its reputation by reporting factual content.
Has Jim considered looking into why people didn't buy Trump brand steaks? Surely it was some sort of conspiracy by the leftist vegetarians.
So how does the Missouri AG have standing to sue Media Matters for alleged defamation of Xitter?
Where does this information come from? Seems that would be a problem that somebody would be trying to regulate.
Eric Umeofia said that he would “rather die than allow someone to tarnish my image I worked 40 years to grow,” all while doing everything in his power to tarnish the image he worked 40 years to grow.
There should be a choice to vote "sad but true."
Huh. Whaddaya know. We don't need A.I. Humans can hallucinate just as well.
There was a time when Monster Cable was the bully, going after everybody who used the name Monster in any way. I think they even sued Disney for Monsters, Inc. So what happened? Did Monster Energy sue the Monster out of them and just swallow them? Those two seem like they should be fighting it out to the death.
Or rent it to the user for an indeterminate time.
“When the only way your case can last under even the most trivial legal scrutiny is if it’s in front of judges so insane, corrupt or both that silly things like ‘legal precedent’ and ‘constitutional rights’ go right out the window that’s a pretty big tell that your case is completely lacking in merit.” But it fully explains why Elon filed the case in Texas.
I would think that you typically see application of the felony murder rule when the defendant is actually charged with committing a felony, like a robbery gone bad. Hard to see how it fits when the defendant’s crime was standing outside in public talking on a phone. The prosecutor seems pretty gutless since it appears he’s unable to stand up to the police and say, “no, I’m not charging anybody for murder when the autopsy calls the death natural.” But it is easy to be hard core when the person on the receiving end of punishment has no standing in the community, just a pawn to be used in the quest to prove that you’re tough on crime.
EFF took a lot of words to say, "Appin, I'm writing to let you know some asshole is signing your name to stupid letters."
Sorry sir, this isn't Xitter.
“No, it’s a yes or no question. I’m going to be running out of time, so I’m assuming the answer is no if you can’t answer yes.” So you're saying that if I look at your political positions and I like some of them but find others problematic, then I should vote for the other person. Got it. That is what you're saying, right Senator? It's a yes or no question.
Are we sure Linda Yaccarino's brain hasn't been replaced by a Neural Link bot? Because I did read that they implanted one in somebody.
Let's see. An asshole to women. Convicted tax evader. Mob ties. Ladies and gentlemen, say hello to new Republican Congressional candidate Nikko D'Ambrosio!
Ok, so does this mean that any person who files a lawsuit alleging discrimination on the basis of race, sex, etc., is also automatically liable for defamation per se? “An allegation that the plaintiff has discriminated against another person or group because of their race, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity constitutes defamation per se”
“A quick look at mappinglasirena’s tumblr site would have proven that the blog was discussing a speed freighter not their client’s customer.” So what if they were talking about the client’s customer? She’s been discussed here as well. So is this article infringing? Is that what DMCA Piracy Prevention thinks, that any mention of a client online is infringing? If so, they’ll be lucky to ever accidentally land on an actually infringing site.
“How dare you besmirch my good name by suggesting I was drunk or on drugs when I wrecked my car into another and killed two innocent people! I was completely in control of my faculties and not impaired in the slightest when I, uh, wait a minute . . . “
Well, fat-fingered a post before I meant to, but the part of the rant quoted in the article seems spot on. Maybe that's the problem. Maybe Bally Sports doesn't want to ruin its reputation by reporting factual content.
". . . with an NBA analyst giving dead-on, solid analysis?"