It could be that she said to her boyfriend/hysband that she's in N.Y. on business and went instead to L.A. with another guy....
Now it could be that publicity around her presumed stay in LA is causing problems with her husband.
This could explain the legal threats.
It could be another way around too: Somebody WANTED to cause her problems with her husband and so spread info (or lies) about her stay in L.A.
In this kind if situation people often behave irrationally...
I just wonder, if somebody at XXAAs relalize the the
$175M US govt want to retrieve from MegaUpload (and probably much more than that) could be in
their own (XXAAs) pocket if they were providing similar service.
I
During last 3-4 years i'm thinking about very similar scheme with following twist:
Each buyer should be offered the choice to simply download the music (for free) or to pay for a 'sponsor token'.
The buyer will distribute the music together with 'his sponsor token'.
Somebody who got music from the primary buyer can pay for
his own 'sponsor token'. When paying for that token the buyer can present the 'sponsor token' of the primary buyer and in that case the primary buyer will get some renumeration.
EFF should launch a class action against gouvernement for illegal domain sesures...
Earn a ton of money and use it to lobby some same copyright legislation
Folks you're really have a knack to vote in joyful presidents.
Clinton with his cigars, now Obama with his groping.
At least Clinton did it with the girl. Well maybe this groping stuff is some kind of pro gar rights stint .
Once again, we're left wondering: why are so many collection societies afraid to give the musicians they claim to represent choice and options when it comes to licensing their works?
The answer is pretty straightforward: They consider anybody who endangers their revenue stream as pirates.
I do not agree that nice people have good chances to reach power.
First of all people don't reach power by chance, one need to desire it very much.
So initially one need to think of himself as better than his entourage, as more deserving position of authority and power.
Second, the competition for power is as any other competition - if you cheat you have better chances to win (unless there is a strong control mechanism - and we don't have it for political struggle).
So if you only show 'niceness' you have better chances than if you are genuinely nice.
The honesty and integrity are handicaps in this competition because you you're honest you can arrive to conclusion that your fellow competitor's ideas and proposals are better than yours, so you have drop out form the competition.
Now if cheaters are better chances to win it is evident that between winners will be a lot of cheaters.
(Which leads to conclusion that a proportion of cheaters are much bigger in power elites than in regular population - which explain pretty well the sorry state of the world affaires)
And when they arrive to power the can stop pretending to be 'nice' and show their real nature.
Hello,
I've started a pretty interesting (IMO) thread regarding
FOSS friendly legislation: on Groklaw And would be intersetd for techdirt folks feedback.
Defamation is really very subjective (as Vadim Lebedev)
It could be that she said to her boyfriend/hysband that she's in N.Y. on business and went instead to L.A. with another guy....
Now it could be that publicity around her presumed stay in LA is causing problems with her husband.
This could explain the legal threats.
It could be another way around too: Somebody WANTED to cause her problems with her husband and so spread info (or lies) about her stay in L.A.
In this kind if situation people often behave irrationally...
MegaUpload
I just wonder, if somebody at XXAAs relalize the the
$175M US govt want to retrieve from MegaUpload (and probably much more than that) could be in
their own (XXAAs) pocket if they were providing similar service.
I
I suggest we push for this law approved
Then organzie couple of thousands people to
send infringement notifications on MPAA, RIAA and their political supportes sites.
(untitled comment)
How about:
BHA for Butt Head Apple?
Incredible
$545K for information available here: http://www.cellebrite.com/images/stories/brochures/UFED%20Physical%20Pro%20Brochure%20%20ENGLISH.pdf
BTW it seems that UFED device must be connected to the target
phone by USB cable for maximum efficiency.
IMO it's TWC should sue Viacom for money
TWC conent brings more customers to Viacom
So Viacom should pay them
Re: Superinjunction
April Foul's Day?
Similar an maybe better scheme
During last 3-4 years i'm thinking about very similar scheme with following twist:
Each buyer should be offered the choice to simply download the music (for free) or to pay for a 'sponsor token'.
The buyer will distribute the music together with 'his sponsor token'.
Somebody who got music from the primary buyer can pay for
his own 'sponsor token'. When paying for that token the buyer can present the 'sponsor token' of the primary buyer and in that case the primary buyer will get some renumeration.
Class Action
EFF should launch a class action against gouvernement for illegal domain sesures...
Earn a ton of money and use it to lobby some same copyright legislation
I used it for witch and magician with pretty suprising results
http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=witch,magician&year_start=1500&year_end=2008& corpus=0&smoothing=3
Tribute to Barack Obama
Folks you're really have a knack to vote in joyful presidents.
Clinton with his cigars, now Obama with his groping.
At least Clinton did it with the girl. Well maybe this groping stuff is some kind of pro gar rights stint .
:)
(untitled comment)
Once again, we're left wondering: why are so many collection societies afraid to give the musicians they claim to represent choice and options when it comes to licensing their works?
The answer is pretty straightforward: They consider anybody who endangers their revenue stream as pirates.
I don't think 'nice' people have chances to get power
I do not agree that nice people have good chances to reach power.
First of all people don't reach power by chance, one need to desire it very much.
So initially one need to think of himself as better than his entourage, as more deserving position of authority and power.
Second, the competition for power is as any other competition - if you cheat you have better chances to win (unless there is a strong control mechanism - and we don't have it for political struggle).
So if you only show 'niceness' you have better chances than if you are genuinely nice.
The honesty and integrity are handicaps in this competition because you you're honest you can arrive to conclusion that your fellow competitor's ideas and proposals are better than yours, so you have drop out form the competition.
Now if cheaters are better chances to win it is evident that between winners will be a lot of cheaters.
(Which leads to conclusion that a proportion of cheaters are much bigger in power elites than in regular population - which explain pretty well the sorry state of the world affaires)
And when they arrive to power the can stop pretending to be 'nice' and show their real nature.
(untitled comment)
And you say Internet does not makes people dumber :)
Bilsky, Bilsky, Bilsky
Let's hope that SCOTUS will abolish SW patents
and flush MPEG-LA's patbes along down the toilet
What about her lawyer?
Her lawyer surely new that she didn't stand a chance...
She should attack the lawyer for malpractice :)
FOSS friendly legislation
Hello, I've started a pretty interesting (IMO) thread regarding FOSS friendly legislation: on Groklaw And would be intersetd for techdirt folks feedback.
Works ok in France