slander’s Comments

• Apr 12th, 2013 @ 7:42am

  Re: Re: Re: Megaupload was doing BUSINESS in the United States.

  on Justice Department Looking To Change The Law That Made It Impossible To Serve Megaupload

  The DOJ sees it as guilty until proven innocent.

  
  The DOJ sees it as guilty.

• Dec 21st, 2012 @ 10:58am

  Re: Re: Re: Re: @ AC: "saying all gun manufacturers are secondary liable"

  on Swedish Appeals Court Says Web Designer Is Responsible For Copyright Infringement On StudentBay

  That isn't the real OOTB. I know this because he didn't blame Google for providing links to StudentBay.

• Dec 4th, 2012 @ 10:10pm

  Re: Re: "just going to be used for massive scamming."

  on Ridiculous: SEC Boss Refused To Move Forward On Required Crowdfunding Rules To Protect Her 'Legacy'

  Me too, me too!

• Nov 28th, 2012 @ 3:03pm

  Re: Re: Re: The encryption itself is the "crime", see?

  on German Court Holds Internet User Responsible For Passing On Unknown, Encrypted File

  If he'd stop using his head solely as a device that keeps his ears separated, he'd get fewer flags.

  
  
  There, much better...

• Nov 20th, 2012 @ 2:46pm

  Re: Re: Re: If we're going to cite IP cases here

  on President Obama Is Not Impressed With Your Right To Modify His Photos

  Actually, my reaction was regarding the relevance to the subject at hand. Would it not be more appropriate to submit this as a separate story?

• Nov 20th, 2012 @ 1:12pm

  Re: If we're going to cite IP cases here

  on President Obama Is Not Impressed With Your Right To Modify His Photos

  Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

• Nov 3rd, 2012 @ 5:31am

  (untitled comment)

  on Just In Time For The Holiday Season, Apple Loses iPhone Trademark In Mexico

  Oh, the iRony...

• Nov 1st, 2012 @ 2:09pm

  Re: Re: Relevant quote

  on John Mellencamp: Thou Shalt Not Permit The Internet To Derail Our Gravy Train

  Heh, according to Twitter, I just did.

• Sep 10th, 2012 @ 4:45pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?

  on Publishing Company Admits That Anonymous' UDID Data Leak Was Actually Taken From Their Database

  Just because I have so much love and respect for such a fine, upstanding gentleman as yourself:
  
  http://www.forbes.com/sites/benkerschberg/2011/05/05/federal-court-rebukes-fbi-for-lyin g-to-the-court-about-surveillance-records/
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaA6Myrvz4Y
  
  http://w ww.ticklethewire.com/2011/12/27/ex-u-s-atty-accuses-fbi-and-prosecutors-of-illegally-obtaining-docum ents-and-lying-about-it/
  
  Of course, I suppose it would be somewhat redundant to mention COINTELPRO, warrantless GPS tracking, and the phony terrorist bombing plots created out of whole cloth.

• Sep 10th, 2012 @ 12:57pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?

  on Publishing Company Admits That Anonymous' UDID Data Leak Was Actually Taken From Their Database

  That's right, keep repeating it over and over again until people start to believe you.
  
  
  You know who else repeated things over and over again until people believed him, don't you?

• Sep 10th, 2012 @ 12:52pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?

  on Publishing Company Admits That Anonymous' UDID Data Leak Was Actually Taken From Their Database

  The FBI is a governmental agency tasked with the duty of upholding the law and serving the public.

  And a pretty piss-poor job they've been doing, at that. Unless you consider siding with corporate and media interests over the people "serving the public." Oh, wait - judging by your history, you do.
  
  

  Anonymous is a bunch of hackers who engage in criminal behavior.

  And the FBI would never stoop to criminal behavior. They would never manufacture evidence. They would never lie in court. They would never wiretap without warrant.
  
  

  Who do you think has more to lose from getting caught lying?

  
  Given the FBI's storied history of lying through their proverbial teeth and not giving and apparent rat's ass about how it affects their public image, I would have to say that Anonymous would.

• Sep 10th, 2012 @ 12:07pm

  Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?

  on Publishing Company Admits That Anonymous' UDID Data Leak Was Actually Taken From Their Database

  Right. Because the FBI's word is so credible.

• Sep 8th, 2012 @ 4:06am

  Re: Re:

  on Far Beyond Filtering: Is The GOP Looking To Shut Down Porn Producers?

  The other of the most blatantly hypocritical political parties being, of course, the Democrats...

• Sep 8th, 2012 @ 4:02am

  Re: Re: Re:

  on French Publishers Want In On German Plan To Force Everyone To Pay To Link To News

  Don't worry. They're safe and sound in their garden, protected by the wall...

• Sep 6th, 2012 @ 4:57am

  Re:

  on Big Banks Finally Punishing Employees For Fraud... Like The Call Center Guy Who Used A Fake Dime 50 Years Ago

  Apparently, we the people are watching "Dancing With the Stars" and "American Idol" instead.

• Sep 6th, 2012 @ 4:51am

  Re: Re: Principled politician?

  on 2012 Democrats: Remember That Civil Liberties Thing From 2008? Um, Nevermind

  Wait - who was this allegedly principled San Diego politician? I have not met a single one who wasn't in somebody's pocket.

• Aug 30th, 2012 @ 2:23pm

  Re:

  on Hall & Oates Convince Super PAC Named After Them To Shut Down

  BJ and the Bear No More Monkeyshines Political Fecal-Matter-Flinging Consortium for the Betterment of the Political Process.

• Aug 6th, 2012 @ 11:33am

  Re: Re: I don't see the problem with Apple's arguments

  on Apple's Argument: Samsung Could Have Made Its Phone Large, Thick, Bumpy, Sharp-Edged & Hexagonal

  Er, whoosh?

• Jul 4th, 2012 @ 1:30pm

  Re: White House Petition

  on Jimmy Wales Confident That UK Gov't Won't Ignore 200,000+ Signatures Against O'Dwyer Extradition

  Because all that any of those petitions do is give the White House staff the opportunity to use their weasel words in order to blow us off.

• Jun 13th, 2012 @ 3:52am

  Re: Re: Re: Funnyjunk isn't entirely wrong

  on The Oatmeal v. Funnyjunk: How The Court Of Public Opinion Beats The Court Of Baseless Legal Threats

  Er, why are you bringing me into this?

More comments from slander >>