“We’re chopping off the head of LulzSec.”?? and therefore "leaders" of Anonymous? What a joke. Lulzsec has been pretty silent, i.e. haven't brought'en me LULZ for a while and now we know why. LEO, and their authoritarian bosses, really don't understand what is going on, much less what it is about. By arresting these "leaders" they think they're making progress. The hydra analogy really fits, because these "heads" are really just MOUTHS, the really scary shit you will never hear about, until someone digs it up and shares it to the world, e.g. Stratfor/Wikileaks.
Do they, or don't they want us to watch their shows?
Why can't they replicate the content online as they do over cable? And pass the costs over to the advertisers... you know, the whole point of advertising in general.
NYT, and others, keep forgetting that viewers are a good thing, and the more viewers (hits and clicks) the more valuable advertising space is. That business model has not changed.
It's true. Microsoft and Apple know this, that's why they push X-Boxes and iTunes so hard. No one wants physical media anymore, except for the hold-outs, but they're still spinning vinyl and rolling in Super-8, they stopped factoring them in 1995.
Is it possible, given your higher-than-usual-profile-especially-regarding-the-media-industry-business-model-criticisms, that there were industry shrills planted to disrupt you when you speak?
Isn't "selling music" more than just a copy of the CD, or a concert ticket? I think it's great and important that an artist can "make a living" from their art, and I will always find it bothersome when an organization who's whole purpose is to "make a buck" is the one "defending" the old business models.
(untitled comment)
“We’re chopping off the head of LulzSec.”?? and therefore "leaders" of Anonymous? What a joke. Lulzsec has been pretty silent, i.e. haven't brought'en me LULZ for a while and now we know why. LEO, and their authoritarian bosses, really don't understand what is going on, much less what it is about. By arresting these "leaders" they think they're making progress. The hydra analogy really fits, because these "heads" are really just MOUTHS, the really scary shit you will never hear about, until someone digs it up and shares it to the world, e.g. Stratfor/Wikileaks.
List of ESA members
Here's a list of members of the ESA:
http://www.theesa.com/about/members.asp
DRM free independent games have been so much better these days anyway.
(untitled comment)
Don't they have advertising? It's not enough?
Do they, or don't they want us to watch their shows?
Why can't they replicate the content online as they do over cable? And pass the costs over to the advertisers... you know, the whole point of advertising in general.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nothing acttually costs anything, so...
Actually, you bring up an interesting subject. In lots of cases it's not the actual artists that sue for infringement, but the estates.
(untitled comment)
"Dude, you have to hear this awesome song."
"Cool, play it."
"No, you have to buy it first."
(untitled comment)
The "detective" is the pirate, not the printer!
So if I get caught selling drugs to a cop, can say I was "testing" them?
(untitled comment)
NYT, and others, keep forgetting that viewers are a good thing, and the more viewers (hits and clicks) the more valuable advertising space is. That business model has not changed.
(untitled comment)
The industry will hang on to their outdated income streams for as long as they can.
And as long as the industry has insiders as government officials, this will be for a while longer.
BLU-RAY WAS DEAD BEFORE DVD EVER DIED...
It's true. Microsoft and Apple know this, that's why they push X-Boxes and iTunes so hard. No one wants physical media anymore, except for the hold-outs, but they're still spinning vinyl and rolling in Super-8, they stopped factoring them in 1995.
(untitled comment)
Is it possible, given your higher-than-usual-profile-especially-regarding-the-media-industry-business-model-criticisms, that there were industry shrills planted to disrupt you when you speak?
Isn't "selling music" more than just a copy of the CD, or a concert ticket? I think it's great and important that an artist can "make a living" from their art, and I will always find it bothersome when an organization who's whole purpose is to "make a buck" is the one "defending" the old business models.
(untitled comment)
Sounds like Blackmail to me, isn't _that_ illegal?
(untitled comment)
Um, isn't OTA TV and Radio based on this model?