That's because the government has said the people can't read them, and that's what we get for having a big government. The people should be allowed to read everything the government creates. It's OUR government after all.
That's not how it works. The studios, along with you, made the INITIAL claim. Therefore the burden of proof lies with you FIRST. Not to mention there was an article a while ago that did actually show the numbers that the studios completely manifested.
I find this response quite curious and deluded. Content industries have been ripping off artist and committing questionable accounting practices LONG before piracy has been around.
While you state you haven't taken a position, you essentially have taken a position by calling it "murder". Murder, by most people's understanding, is an illegal killing of a person due to whatever reason. While the kid was in fact killed, we still don't have any proof as of yet that is convincing enough to say "Yes, it was cold blooded murder." It could legitimately be self defense in some manner. I find it unlikely that we'll even discover what truly happened in this particular case due to abysmal police investigation at the time.
This is exactly what I was thinking. Once you have people with this kind of power there becomes the problem of not "Can they be bribed" but really "How much will it take to bribe them?". I have a suspicion that content owners and people hailing the take downs finally found the "how much" to get ICANN to bow to their whims.
Why do you insist that Mike wants everything for free when almost all of his posts he makes demonstrates a way to make income. If someone truly wanted everything for free I seriously doubt he'd be giving suggestions on how to monetize this new market you and your posse seem completely incapable of understanding.
Example is bit torrent. It is pretty much a given that a large percentage of the traffic in bit torrent is pirated material.
Please CITE YOUR SOURCES. You shills continually come in here, demanding sources, laughing at every outside source given, and continually dodge/avoid every opportunity for you to actually legitimize your false claims.
So you admit to not even checking the second link then, even though it IS a French Ministry of Justice document. Well done. Just because a document is posted on an opinion page doesn't mean it's not official. That's like saying if the RIAA posted a document from congress it's ok for me to completely ignore it because the RIAA website WILL be an opinion website.
I also note that you're still responding to these message about the sources but you're completely ignoring my issue about wireless router WIFI implications. You've had several minutes to explain how that is supposed to work and you've tactfully ignored it.
Right, so the second link (which is from d1) is a completely made up document that's not really from the French Ministry of Justice, is that what you're attempting to claim?
Nice job completely ignoring the other and longer point I made though. Good to know that you're trying to have a real discussion about the real issues here.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes, the government has too much access to my information to create anything about me.
Re: Re: Re:
That's because the government has said the people can't read them, and that's what we get for having a big government. The people should be allowed to read everything the government creates. It's OUR government after all.
Re:
Unfortunately for the government, they can't claim any kind of copyright on these as they're government documents. They belong to the people.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
What a truly thought provoking, intellectually non-stimulating response.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's not how it works. The studios, along with you, made the INITIAL claim. Therefore the burden of proof lies with you FIRST. Not to mention there was an article a while ago that did actually show the numbers that the studios completely manifested.
Re:
I find this response quite curious and deluded. Content industries have been ripping off artist and committing questionable accounting practices LONG before piracy has been around.
Re:
We really should coin the phrase "The Carreon Effect" as more and more people seem to being doing this lately...
Re: Re:
While you state you haven't taken a position, you essentially have taken a position by calling it "murder". Murder, by most people's understanding, is an illegal killing of a person due to whatever reason. While the kid was in fact killed, we still don't have any proof as of yet that is convincing enough to say "Yes, it was cold blooded murder." It could legitimately be self defense in some manner. I find it unlikely that we'll even discover what truly happened in this particular case due to abysmal police investigation at the time.
Re:
This is exactly what I was thinking. Once you have people with this kind of power there becomes the problem of not "Can they be bribed" but really "How much will it take to bribe them?". I have a suspicion that content owners and people hailing the take downs finally found the "how much" to get ICANN to bow to their whims.
Re:
Why do you insist that Mike wants everything for free when almost all of his posts he makes demonstrates a way to make income. If someone truly wanted everything for free I seriously doubt he'd be giving suggestions on how to monetize this new market you and your posse seem completely incapable of understanding.
Re: Re: Re:
Your gratuitous "gratuitous", "individual", "opinion", and "disappointing" to the expression of an individual is disappointing.
A comment made in good faith deserves more than an impertinent response.
Re: Re: Where are the shills?
Lol, I can't wait to see if they're successful at that!
Where are the shills?
I find it very interesting none of them have come out of the woodwork to comment on this. Interesting indeed...
Re:
Example is bit torrent. It is pretty much a given that a large percentage of the traffic in bit torrent is pirated material.
Please CITE YOUR SOURCES. You shills continually come in here, demanding sources, laughing at every outside source given, and continually dodge/avoid every opportunity for you to actually legitimize your false claims.
Re: Re:
We don't NEED people (ANYONE) writing legislation for ANY content owners/creators/sellers/copiers/etc...
Re:
rather than using your single copy as source material for however many pirated copies you see fit
Please cite your sources proving WE do this.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'm still waiting to hear his response about the implications of unsecured WIFI infringement as well.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So you admit to not even checking the second link then, even though it IS a French Ministry of Justice document. Well done. Just because a document is posted on an opinion page doesn't mean it's not official. That's like saying if the RIAA posted a document from congress it's ok for me to completely ignore it because the RIAA website WILL be an opinion website.
I also note that you're still responding to these message about the sources but you're completely ignoring my issue about wireless router WIFI implications. You've had several minutes to explain how that is supposed to work and you've tactfully ignored it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Right, so the second link (which is from d1) is a completely made up document that's not really from the French Ministry of Justice, is that what you're attempting to claim?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Nice job completely ignoring the other and longer point I made though. Good to know that you're trying to have a real discussion about the real issues here.