It actually _was_ called Formula 51 in the US. IMDB also noted that in the UK (and presumably much of Europe) it went by 51st State. Which is understandable, I suppose, since the move contained references to both titles.
I think the US government has made it clear that it's not too concerned about making friends.
As an American, I'd like to make it clear that I believe what my government is doing is wrong. Please don't hold my governemnt's actions against me personally. I'm bitching as loud as I can.
The poiticians, even as they're trying to say "We get it", don't get it. On one hand, they think it's the tech companies they need to appease. Then they think it's the "nerds" they need to appease. What they don't get (and Mike states as much, I'm just boiling it down) it that it's the citizenry, the people the politicians (allegedly) represent that need to be appeased. They have such a warped sense of who they work for (i.e. corporations and special interests) that they've completely forgotten that it is the average citizen that they should be worried about.
I feel more confident everyday in my "Vote out incumbents" philosophy.
I, too, immediately thought that this might have been "associated" with LV. But then, a split second later I noticed the TM (rather than LV) monogram, and the copyright symbol. Noticing that, I read most of the text on the poster and realized that the creator of the artwork had parodied the LV "pattern".
Apparently you skipped everything after "But then". Go back, look at the poster again, and I think you'll come to the same conslusion that I did; the artwork is a parody that effectively illustrates the very topics to be addressed, as further idicated by the TEXT in the poster.
So, why don't the search engines simply agree to abide by the "wishes" of the studios and the governments. but explicitly state in the search results that is only presenting what the government allows them to present.
Think about the sh*tstorm that would be created if you searched for a song or movie, and at the top of the result set it stated in nice, big, bold text "The U.K. Government, in cooperation with the MPAA and/or RIAA, have limited us to showing you the following results. There are other sites that asre pertinent to your query, but we are not allowed to show them to you."
I seem to think that would draw a lot of attention to the issue.
Re: Re:
It actually _was_ called Formula 51 in the US. IMDB also noted that in the UK (and presumably much of Europe) it went by 51st State. Which is understandable, I suppose, since the move contained references to both titles.
Re: Re: If you are easily disturbed do not read this comment.
I think the US government has made it clear that it's not too concerned about making friends.
As an American, I'd like to make it clear that I believe what my government is doing is wrong. Please don't hold my governemnt's actions against me personally. I'm bitching as loud as I can.
(untitled comment)
From the movie "Formula 51"...
"England ain't nuthin but the 51st state!"
Apparently, that's true.
Re: Is it a requirement...
In SABAM's view? All of 'em. Pay up, sucka!
(untitled comment)
Average Joe to Collection Societies: F--k Off and Die.
Remarkable
The poiticians, even as they're trying to say "We get it", don't get it. On one hand, they think it's the tech companies they need to appease. Then they think it's the "nerds" they need to appease. What they don't get (and Mike states as much, I'm just boiling it down) it that it's the citizenry, the people the politicians (allegedly) represent that need to be appeased. They have such a warped sense of who they work for (i.e. corporations and special interests) that they've completely forgotten that it is the average citizen that they should be worried about.
I feel more confident everyday in my "Vote out incumbents" philosophy.
Re: Re: Whip out the clue bat! But...
I'd say it is more like HOW the Streisand Effect was created, but your point is duly noted.
Re:
I, too, immediately thought that this might have been "associated" with LV. But then, a split second later I noticed the TM (rather than LV) monogram, and the copyright symbol. Noticing that, I read most of the text on the poster and realized that the creator of the artwork had parodied the LV "pattern".
Apparently you skipped everything after "But then". Go back, look at the poster again, and I think you'll come to the same conslusion that I did; the artwork is a parody that effectively illustrates the very topics to be addressed, as further idicated by the TEXT in the poster.
Re: Re: Forcing our views...
Yeah, we get it. The actual acts are illegal, so writing about it must be illegal too.
Oh wait...except it's (generally) not. So much for your brilliant theory.
Re: Fuck Off
I thought that's what we had been doing. They just don't seem to be in a cooperative mood...
Re: A simple solution?
It would be nice if I could type...
A simple solution?
So, why don't the search engines simply agree to abide by the "wishes" of the studios and the governments. but explicitly state in the search results that is only presenting what the government allows them to present.
Think about the sh*tstorm that would be created if you searched for a song or movie, and at the top of the result set it stated in nice, big, bold text "The U.K. Government, in cooperation with the MPAA and/or RIAA, have limited us to showing you the following results. There are other sites that asre pertinent to your query, but we are not allowed to show them to you."
I seem to think that would draw a lot of attention to the issue.
Re:
WTF indeed. Time for a bogus copyright lawsuit?
Going overboard
Sounds like the Park Rangers are now part of the TSA.
(untitled comment)
In the tech world, such a situation is commonly called eating your own dog food. Eat up, assholes. There's more where that came from.
(untitled comment)
Why do i get the weird feeling that NBC told him to say something like that. I know it makes no sense, but still
*shakes head ponderingly*
Re: Re: Re: newly established content provider
Agreed. However, you never know when some SOPA-supporting moron is going to try and sneak in here and spew all over us.
Re: newly established content provider
I really, REALLY hope you just forgot to add
/sarcasm
at the end of that post.