I bought both my children and grandchildren dictionaries. The reason for this is that when I was a child, I learned quite a bit from words I found on the way to words I was actually trying to find. If you can customize everything you can see you won't find things you don't know. The sad thing is you won't even know you missed them.
If only one party could consent a lot more politicians would find their phone calls presented at their trials. This would not go well from their point of view.
So I just have to accept that the medication the doctor proscribes for my condition will not cause me side effects. How about whether or not a resturant has passed a health inspection? It is commercially sensitive. Or is it only large companies with lots of lawyers who do not have to share their information?
Except for the problem that you will always be able to pirate music and the experience in France shows stronger enforcement does not lead to higher purchasing levels. So it is possible only if you decide to disregard the current evidence.
Updated 06/08/2012: It turns out that the developers in question were actually censured for keyword spam -- they overloaded their app descriptions and meta data with keywords. This happened to coincide with the roll-out of the new guidelines. You can read more about Google's Play policies here.
We don't actually have "free trade". If we did doctors licensed in India or Somolia could practice in any country without having to be recertified. I have not noticed that happening.
May be we have been looking at everything from the wrong angle. All these years we have thought the anti piracy laws were to stop counterfeiting for the benefit of Hollywood. Maybe the government has been using this as an excuse to bend the rules of law to their advantage.
I bought the first book(hard copy) of a series for my grandaughter. She loved it. I tried to buy the second book from B&N. It was out of stock, but they would order it. I could have it in 3 weeks. Amazon could get it to me in 3 to 5 days and it was cheaper. Where would you have purchased it?
Assuming a law is needed, any law will initially cause an increase in crime because it is making a behavior criminal which was previously not criminal. Once that barrier is passed it would be enforcement of the law that mattered.
You are not going to find a way forward if you say the way forward is more value for "me". The internet does produce more value. It is spread around to a greater number of people so it looks smaller but in aggregate it is greater than what we had.
And in the 1980's the system was changed to allow procedures and business idea's to be patented pretty much doing away with the necessity to come up with a working model. That and the fact that most of the people vetting patents are no longer highly informed in the field means we have a broken system. Go back to patenting physical objects that you create only and the system would be acceptable again.
I believe the Authors' Guild view on libraries is that the author should be paid each time a book is checked out. So far they have not asked for money each time it is read.
If you actually create something, no it does not. Since generally most copyrighted works are building off what others in society have created the attempt to lock up all materials used for your creation is like builders trying to patent wood used in buildings.
Re:
If there is a phone out there that could survive a crash with readable data, I think I would like to buy it. It could also survive my 3 year old then.
Re:
I bought both my children and grandchildren dictionaries. The reason for this is that when I was a child, I learned quite a bit from words I found on the way to words I was actually trying to find. If you can customize everything you can see you won't find things you don't know. The sad thing is you won't even know you missed them.
One party consent
If only one party could consent a lot more politicians would find their phone calls presented at their trials. This would not go well from their point of view.
Prioritize
Maybe it was reported right away and the police responded to it with all the speed it required.
Re: Re:
Lasers are ineffective at that size over long distances. Go with the helfire missle option.
Re: Transparency
So I just have to accept that the medication the doctor proscribes for my condition will not cause me side effects. How about whether or not a resturant has passed a health inspection? It is commercially sensitive. Or is it only large companies with lots of lawyers who do not have to share their information?
Old time fraud
I am surprised noone has brought up banks and mortgage derivetatives
Re: Re: Prediction
Except for the problem that you will always be able to pirate music and the experience in France shows stronger enforcement does not lead to higher purchasing levels. So it is possible only if you decide to disregard the current evidence.
Re:
Zombies everywhere are starving while the best brains in IP work on this.
update
Updated 06/08/2012: It turns out that the developers in question were actually censured for keyword spam -- they overloaded their app descriptions and meta data with keywords. This happened to coincide with the roll-out of the new guidelines. You can read more about Google's Play policies here.
Re: Re: Re:
We don't actually have "free trade". If we did doctors licensed in India or Somolia could practice in any country without having to be recertified. I have not noticed that happening.
Different point of view
May be we have been looking at everything from the wrong angle. All these years we have thought the anti piracy laws were to stop counterfeiting for the benefit of Hollywood. Maybe the government has been using this as an excuse to bend the rules of law to their advantage.
Nice if B&N would compete
I bought the first book(hard copy) of a series for my grandaughter. She loved it. I tried to buy the second book from B&N. It was out of stock, but they would order it. I could have it in 3 weeks. Amazon could get it to me in 3 to 5 days and it was cheaper. Where would you have purchased it?
Re:
"They" aren't everywhere as your comment indicates "They" no longer in the closet. You could try spending time in there.
Re:
Copyright Bars, Copyright Districts
Re:
Assuming a law is needed, any law will initially cause an increase in crime because it is making a behavior criminal which was previously not criminal. Once that barrier is passed it would be enforcement of the law that mattered.
Re:
You are not going to find a way forward if you say the way forward is more value for "me". The internet does produce more value. It is spread around to a greater number of people so it looks smaller but in aggregate it is greater than what we had.
Re: TechDirt totally out of touch about how much patents pay for innovation
And in the 1980's the system was changed to allow procedures and business idea's to be patented pretty much doing away with the necessity to come up with a working model. That and the fact that most of the people vetting patents are no longer highly informed in the field means we have a broken system. Go back to patenting physical objects that you create only and the system would be acceptable again.
Rental
I believe the Authors' Guild view on libraries is that the author should be paid each time a book is checked out. So far they have not asked for money each time it is read.
Re: One more time
If you actually create something, no it does not. Since generally most copyrighted works are building off what others in society have created the attempt to lock up all materials used for your creation is like builders trying to patent wood used in buildings.