Not that it justifies double the price, but I agree if you check any baggage this trick will not work unless you have huge layover times. As Danny says booking seperately means you can't check your bags to your final destination which means at each stop you will need to go down to baggage claim, get your bag, recheck it, and then re-go through security.
Even without checked bags, if you forget to pre-print your boarding passes for you other flights you may have to leave the terminal to go check in which means another round of security. You may be able to find someone to check you in in the terminal at customer service or another gate, but that isn't a guarantee.
It's so detrimental to children we must prevent them from seeing it, unless according to the second bill, their parents get it for them. I look forward to his followup bills where cigarettes, alcohol, and porn are now ok for children as long as their parent or guardian purchases it for them.
The "right to be free FROM expression" is one way to many people think they have. Hence all the stupid lawsuits we see here on this site over bad reviews or comments that offend someone. So Mr. Armenta has no monopoly on this kind of stupidity as there are no shortage of lawyers willing to push cases like this.
All Time Warner has to do is cancel it's service with the City and then sign up using a different name. Then it will get all the same deductions and incentives the city is offering new customers..er I mean new providers.
So I invent something useful for society, and yet my ability to profit of of it is significantly shorter then some guy who then walks up and takes a picture of it?
Not that the copyright length is reasonable, but doesn't that strike anyone as having our priorities backwards?
This is England we're talking about, it's time to get medieval. If they simply cut out their tongues and cut of their fingers, that would stop the communication as well, and then everyone will go back to being productive members of society again.
I know some judges like to quote movies when responding to filings. I think this one is appropriate:
"Mr. Wolk, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
The above is of course is not intended to imply an factual information about Mr Wolk's intellect.
If you settle with a company before a lawsuit and it later comes out that the lawsuit was unfounded, can you sue the company to get your settlement back?
Re: Two other disadvantages of separate leg bookings
Not that it justifies double the price, but I agree if you check any baggage this trick will not work unless you have huge layover times. As Danny says booking seperately means you can't check your bags to your final destination which means at each stop you will need to go down to baggage claim, get your bag, recheck it, and then re-go through security.
Even without checked bags, if you forget to pre-print your boarding passes for you other flights you may have to leave the terminal to go check in which means another round of security. You may be able to find someone to check you in in the terminal at customer service or another gate, but that isn't a guarantee.
Can't have it both ways
It's so detrimental to children we must prevent them from seeing it, unless according to the second bill, their parents get it for them. I look forward to his followup bills where cigarettes, alcohol, and porn are now ok for children as long as their parent or guardian purchases it for them.
Business Model
For once Mike's charge of "felony interference with a business model" might be a valid charge.
Unfortunately
The "right to be free FROM expression" is one way to many people think they have. Hence all the stupid lawsuits we see here on this site over bad reviews or comments that offend someone. So Mr. Armenta has no monopoly on this kind of stupidity as there are no shortage of lawyers willing to push cases like this.
It's Quite Simple
All Time Warner has to do is cancel it's service with the City and then sign up using a different name. Then it will get all the same deductions and incentives the city is offering new customers..er I mean new providers.
“If it’s fair use, why offer to pay for anything?”
Didn't the mafia use a similar line of reasoning when offering "protection" for various businesses.
"That's a nice documentary film you got there. Be a shame if anything happens to it"
Backwards
So I invent something useful for society, and yet my ability to profit of of it is significantly shorter then some guy who then walks up and takes a picture of it?
Not that the copyright length is reasonable, but doesn't that strike anyone as having our priorities backwards?
Why stop there.
This is England we're talking about, it's time to get medieval. If they simply cut out their tongues and cut of their fingers, that would stop the communication as well, and then everyone will go back to being productive members of society again.
quote
I know some judges like to quote movies when responding to filings. I think this one is appropriate:
"Mr. Wolk, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
The above is of course is not intended to imply an factual information about Mr Wolk's intellect.
Billy Madison FTW
Question
If you settle with a company before a lawsuit and it later comes out that the lawsuit was unfounded, can you sue the company to get your settlement back?