Yeah, it is seeming more and more like this deserves a follow up post. Falling 10% and your first few hours of underwriter-less trading is hard to positively spin.
Thank you kindly for asking my question, though I would have liked to get his opinion on the very small difference in price for the physical and electronic version, rather than just acknowledging that he has no role in the process.
was mighty nice of him to point to the paper, any author willing to point to free versions while selling the same is high quality, may just purchase a copy for that very reason.
the law firm is working without fee if not paying Voltage for the privilege of letting them go after this small set.
Since they have been in the shakedown business for a solid year now with nothing to show, the US Copyright Group has to find a way to prove their strategy profitable. As of now there are only downsides to their approach, thus not so many customers requesting the service.
If we could see the agreement for this latest round, I bet that Voltage is getting actual and potential revenue in exchange for little more than a head nod.
I hope there is something behind door number two, because if you are going in with only arguments of structure and metaphor, I'll start taking bets against you now. I think just about every Feist song ever fits your description of infringement from the information at hand.
Just not some of the more fantastical of charges, which are probably being plea bargained away for the ones that are sticky. Downloading anything off of the SIPR and sending it to your friend should not be acceptable, without regard to the content. And downloading 1.6GB worth of that data and sending it to your foreign friend is retarded, makes you want to declare war with Sweden just to get him on all 22.
So continue monitoring him and let him try... Because then we might actually learn something about the supply of weaponry and information thereof. Why not use that influence on the mark to encourage him to seek his own means and expose other people and potentially some upstream vulnerabilities?
....unless of course they explored all of those prospects and realized this guy was probably better handled by the risk manufacturing division.
Maybe next time they can setup multiple people to be at the same place and arrest a "cell".
(untitled comment)
However, one thing I'll stand by is the claim that the lack of a pop is a good sign, not a bad sign.
A downward moving number that is only mitigated by underwriters, is both lack of a pop and a bad sign.
Re: Re:
Why are you commenting on a subject you don't appear to know much about?
speaking of...can we get a follow up on the facebook IPO post.
ty, tyvm.
Re:
Yeah, it is seeming more and more like this deserves a follow up post. Falling 10% and your first few hours of underwriter-less trading is hard to positively spin.
just antagonizing
bitcoin defenders using the FBI investigation as a defense for its legitimacy in 3..2..
(untitled comment)
Thank you kindly for asking my question, though I would have liked to get his opinion on the very small difference in price for the physical and electronic version, rather than just acknowledging that he has no role in the process.
was mighty nice of him to point to the paper, any author willing to point to free versions while selling the same is high quality, may just purchase a copy for that very reason.
Re:
Please stop using homonyms, because yes, they refer back to homos.
I bet a dollar...
the law firm is working without fee if not paying Voltage for the privilege of letting them go after this small set.
Since they have been in the shakedown business for a solid year now with nothing to show, the US Copyright Group has to find a way to prove their strategy profitable. As of now there are only downsides to their approach, thus not so many customers requesting the service.
If we could see the agreement for this latest round, I bet that Voltage is getting actual and potential revenue in exchange for little more than a head nod.
Another classic closing sentence
Results like these show, though, show that strategic enforcement is also necessary and do make a difference.
I know they stutter and backtrack when they speak, but they really need to either hire or fire an editor.
Re:
Moreover, why doesn't Google simply pull out of Germany?
Cut em off first, negotiate second.
(untitled comment)
I hope there is something behind door number two, because if you are going in with only arguments of structure and metaphor, I'll start taking bets against you now. I think just about every Feist song ever fits your description of infringement from the information at hand.
or
he doesn't care because scamming the system is making him filthy rich, and he does not care in the least how patents impact the tech industry.
umm
freeze at 0:19 = peer to pier
freeze at 0:21 = peer to peer
just seems if you are going to make a horrible PSA, you wouldnt jack up the basic things, and save your ruin for the overall message.
Re: Re: Where are the BAR Associations?
I would say any legal system that has a monetary requirement should be discarded.
Because West Texas will provide you expert free rulings all day with proof of purchase.
(untitled comment)
Bildungsroman maybe. We follow this translation and we end up telling people romantic stories about picture planning.
Re: Re: Re:
ehh, they feel more like a draw :)
Re:
at least those of us who don't hack out blog pieces with slow-loading jpegs
because they are certainly lower those who hack out blog pieces in the comments of someone else's blog.
Re: Re: He is certainly guilty of crimes
That's a fantastic content based rebuttal to: "without regard to content"
He is certainly guilty of crimes
Just not some of the more fantastical of charges, which are probably being plea bargained away for the ones that are sticky. Downloading anything off of the SIPR and sending it to your friend should not be acceptable, without regard to the content. And downloading 1.6GB worth of that data and sending it to your foreign friend is retarded, makes you want to declare war with Sweden just to get him on all 22.
Re: Re: Perhaps one of your links should be annotated thusly
I concur. That site should be avoided at all costs. It is of no use to a logical defense or rational argument.
Re: Amazing
So continue monitoring him and let him try... Because then we might actually learn something about the supply of weaponry and information thereof. Why not use that influence on the mark to encourage him to seek his own means and expose other people and potentially some upstream vulnerabilities?
....unless of course they explored all of those prospects and realized this guy was probably better handled by the risk manufacturing division.
Maybe next time they can setup multiple people to be at the same place and arrest a "cell".