Ramon Creager’s Techdirt Profile

drweevil

About Ramon Creager




Ramon Creager’s Comments comment rss

  • Apr 15th, 2014 @ 3:01pm

    Hypothetical...

    What if Google reports it to the gov, and the gov then turns around classifies the info and forbids Google from disclosing it? Non-Google customers would still be screwed. Not sure how legal that would be but they seem to just do whatever they please.

  • Apr 14th, 2014 @ 7:16am

    Anti-competitive behaviour: the new normal

    Not a GOT viewer, but I am a cord-cutter and a soccer nut. While I can watch UEFA Champion's League soccer on FoxSoccer2Go and MLS soccer on MLSLive (both reasonable models on how it ought to be done), I can't watch any of my favorites, the Spanish Primera. And that is because BeIN sports owns the rights (and those to the EPL), and will only stream to Comcast, DirecTV and Dish customers.

    Now, why would I need an expensive satellite or cable contract so that I can bypass it all and stream? It makes Zero sense. This is IMO an anti-competitive practice. It really is theft (how ironic), and ought to be banned. (I'm not holding my breath.)

    The other thing that may change this situation is more people cutting the cord. Just say no to bundling thievery, and yes to a better life without these crooks.

  • Dec 18th, 2013 @ 5:41am

    This is a feature, not a bug.

    At least to the US and its multi-national corporate and financial masters. To the rest of us, the very name Investor State Dispute Settlement is an insult. It places a sovereign state, representing the people of its nation, on the same level as unnamed, unaccountable "investors." Nice.

  • Dec 18th, 2013 @ 5:38am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Trouble is, Ecuador likely has assets in the western financial system, which is in cahoots with these villains.

  • Dec 6th, 2013 @ 6:32am

    "they had no choice"

    And it's buddy, "time was running out". This is the language used to squelch debate and justify the unjustifiable. Why was there no choice? What does it mean "time was running out"? Who makes such a decision? It is Orwellian (and dangerous) to blame the powerless (a mentally ill man posing no real threat in this case) for the poor decisions of those who hold all the cards.

    But I get it. The police can never be wrong. The police can never be held accountable. And they are sooo misunderstood, such a difficult job.

    And, anyone else disturbed that a grand jury should buy this juvenile argument?

  • Nov 16th, 2013 @ 8:07am

    Re: Seriously?

    "Protectionist crap"? Nice misdirection. This isn't about "free trade" at all. TTIP & TPP are "The Big Rock Candy Mountain" for multinational corporations. Every thing they could wish for in their most fevered dreams is there, local and sovereign governments and the will of local peoples be damned. You don't want your water to be poisoned by frackers? Too bad, you're interfering with their God given right to present and future profits. You have a dispute with them? You can take it to their kangaroo courts, where the issue will be decided by anonymous corporate lawyers. This is no exaggeration, if you've been paying any attention. And it certainly is not free trade.

  • Nov 16th, 2013 @ 7:57am

    Hasn't worked out so well for Mexico either

    In fact it has destroyed the Mexican lower classes. And then we get all bent out of shape when drug cartels take over, jobless and landless peasants try to come here for work, etc. etc. etc. ad-nauseum.

    What really gets me about what is happening these days is how the elites, whose ideology and credibility have been totally destroyed by the crash of 2008 and their reaction to it, are able to double down on every evil thing that has brought us to this point.

  • Sep 24th, 2013 @ 12:57pm

    Further argument against point 3


    3. Recognize that this surveillance is key to national security.


    Even if true this point is invalid because it fails to consider whether some effective tool or another is not only effective, but acceptable in a Constitutional democracy. Lets take, for instance, torture. Even if we grant that torture is effective--or even "key", is this the kind of thing we want for our country? Not I. Not our founding fathers, who by putting in place a Bill of Rights rejected tactics like these while facing perils far greater than we will ever face. So effectiveness alone is no argument.