"Didn't we petition the president for Chris Dodd to be arrested and put on trial for attempting to bribe the president? Why is he still walking around free and giving speeches? Put this bum in prison already."
And the White House has already responded. "We Don't Do That" and now that petition isn't even listed on the site.
Perhaps we should just keep doing it again and again until they get the message.
But the only solution to a "too big to check" is to have an algorithm that checks, WHICH THIS COMPANY HAD. So effectively, you are saying that there's no way for them to win. Or that the only solution is a perfect algorithm.
Let me know when you write that.
The simple truth is that this is overreach by the government pure and simple. And the fact that a business can be shut down, and the investigating officer can be too busy to look into it FOR DAYS is inexcusable and SHOULD BE criminal. But of course, the law will PROTECT the abuser, while punishing the innocent.
This kind of security theater is to comfort the sheeple. It accomplishes nothing, but gives our "leaders" something to point at and say "See, we're keeping you safe". Right up until the next incident. The terrorists look at what we are doing, and then plan their actions around it. Just like the last time, and the time before that, and the time before that...
Those who accept this "to be kept safe" deserve not our anger or frustration, but our pity. Their ilk can be found in every dictatorship, quietly accepting whatever they are told. Sad, really.
I actually am glad that at my age, I will not see the unpleasant end result of the continuing landgrab of liberty. I feel sorry that my children will have to go thru the inevitable American Revolution II.
Re: Re: Re: distraction
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is a very good example of the charming customer service that is driving the record profits of most airlines.
Re:
"Didn't we petition the president for Chris Dodd to be arrested and put on trial for attempting to bribe the president? Why is he still walking around free and giving speeches? Put this bum in prison already."
And the White House has already responded. "We Don't Do That" and now that petition isn't even listed on the site.
Perhaps we should just keep doing it again and again until they get the message.
Re: Re: Re: Too big to check isn't tolerable
But the only solution to a "too big to check" is to have an algorithm that checks, WHICH THIS COMPANY HAD. So effectively, you are saying that there's no way for them to win. Or that the only solution is a perfect algorithm.
Let me know when you write that.
The simple truth is that this is overreach by the government pure and simple. And the fact that a business can be shut down, and the investigating officer can be too busy to look into it FOR DAYS is inexcusable and SHOULD BE criminal. But of course, the law will PROTECT the abuser, while punishing the innocent.
Shameful.
Re: Representation...
I would trust Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy far further than I would Chris Dodd or Cary Sherman
As so many have rightly said...
This kind of security theater is to comfort the sheeple. It accomplishes nothing, but gives our "leaders" something to point at and say "See, we're keeping you safe". Right up until the next incident. The terrorists look at what we are doing, and then plan their actions around it. Just like the last time, and the time before that, and the time before that...
Those who accept this "to be kept safe" deserve not our anger or frustration, but our pity. Their ilk can be found in every dictatorship, quietly accepting whatever they are told. Sad, really.
I actually am glad that at my age, I will not see the unpleasant end result of the continuing landgrab of liberty. I feel sorry that my children will have to go thru the inevitable American Revolution II.