Lowestofthekeys' Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the hollywood-run-amuck dept
Reading through the menagerie of Techdirt posts this week led me to develop a better understanding of how some of these media companies work as well as to increase my disdain for Hollywood and their view of the consumer.
First up, we have the article regarding HBO's lack of foresight:
It's awesome to run a business; I don't attempt to run a business because pop music already gives me high blood pressure. I do understand certain fundamentals though, like planning for the long-term. HBO apparently doesn't understand this, and as bob so brilliantly brought out (Black Swan wins again!), the industry has set itself up into a position where it has to maintain revenues at a specific level or it will collapse. Because of this, the consumer suffers because HBO expects us to adapt to their needs.
Second, we have the article about Disney's presentation on copyright and creativity:
The pattern of shortsightedness continues, though here we have a company that built itself on two things: copyright and public domain, but seems to be very focused on the copyright aspect. I haven't seen the presentation, but if I were the gambling type, I'd place my bets on the fact that it will be geared towards stronger copyright law and it's relation to creativity. If this proves true, then it just adds insult to injury with Disney's already stellar record of denying the public domain, and by extension creators everywhere, the content it needs.
My third favorite was Zach Knight's (vampire detective?) article on focusing on why people don't buy:
To me, this article focuses on two things: foresight and analysis. These two aspects are key to marketing effectively, but yet Hollywood is focused on preventing stage six, which basically means their time and effort is spent trying to prevent people from taking things for free instead of nipping the process in the bud by seeing what they can change earlier on to make people want to buy. Frankly, the latter seems like it has a more sustainable, long-term effect while the former just sustains the current model. This is, once again, an example of why Steve Jobs was an awesome businessman, and Hollywood is a terrible child.

Re:
So two wrongs make a right?
Re: Re: Re:
"That's because they have knowledge and experience in such creations, and ventured capital up front as an investment in that content, believing it was desirable and would return its investment."
So that's why they made 6 Fast and Furious movies.
You also left out the part about them throwing money at politicians, that makes keeping their investments in tact consistent despite undermining the system of law.
Re:
I just had a moment where I envisioned him talking to a witness on the stand....
Ken: So you say you saw the defendant walking into the grocery store...
Witness: Yes, I saw him holding a gun and walking into the store at the time of the robbery
Ken: Are you sure this is the man you saw
Witness: I swear to GOD!
Ken: SWEAR TO ME!!!
Re: Re: Re:
Discussing the similarities between games is not a relevant subject for Techdirt...
Not to say the subject isn't important, but if you're looking for that kind of a discussion there's plenty of gaming blogs out there.
Re:
I was discussing this issue with Hollywood on wired.com.
They have the exact same mentality of big budget = great content.
That's one more thing to add to the list of things that hurt Hollywood that aren't related to piracy.
Re: Just Google for "propaganda" and it'll recurse infinitely!
Blue, do you have an opinion on corporate nationalism?
Re:
This is the difficulty of running a business, and it's also their prerogative to do what they can to stay in business, which doesn't make it right, but if there's anything we can learn it's that the people running business will do what it takes to look out for the business and themselves.
Re: comments disabled
At the MPAA, information flows one way.
(untitled comment)
It's interesting...this whole thing reminds me of what Harry G Frankfurt referred to in his book "on bullshit."
He basically says that "bullshitting", particularly the kind done by politicians, is different and much more effective than lying because the person truly believes, to an extent, in what they're saying.
Dodd is a perfect example of this with his background in politics.
Re: one for the lawyers
"Does the presence of the string "Homeland" in a file name constitute a good-faith belief that the material is infringing?"
Good point, and one thing it relates to is the constant bickering on how Google does not enforce removal of copyrighted content the same way it enforces the removal of child pornography.
If these guys have such a hard time knowing what is, and isn't infringing, how is Google supposed to do it?
Re: Re:
He's done that about a dozen times now.
Re: Diet?
Don't knock diet Dew...it diluted many a glasses of Old Crow scotch for me back in the day.
Re:
No, there was definitely no non-douchebag clause in the TOS, people were just hoping EA would practice the principle of being non-douchebags.
Re: Re:
Hrmm...I used to have playstation plus and was not able to play Warhammer 40k Marine without an internet connection after I moved.
Maybe things have changed, but that was last August.
Re: Re: As usual, Misleading Mike reads only what fits his template.
If you think about it, it does make sense he's been "chasing Mike."
I mean, the careful craft of blue's repressed bromance notes scream unrequited love.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: One from Big Search and one from its lobbyist lackeys
Oh so this is a play on egos?
Well, good luck with that.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: One from Big Search and one from its lobbyist lackeys
Then why the hell are you arguing about his viewpoint and not that the law should be fixed to account for that loophole?
Re: Re: Re: Exciting reading, but I don't get your point.
"...but this is the data that "they" will work with."
This is the sad truth of how things are. Luckily, some people call these organizations on their bogus statistics as evidenced by one of the Ars Technica writers who examined some RIAA stats on musicians:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/have-we-lost-41-percent-of-our-musicians-de pends-on-how-you-the-riaa-count/
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: One from Big Search and one from its lobbyist lackeys
"... making excuses for these grifters making money off of content they haven't paid a dime to rebroadcast."
Where exactly did he make excuses?
I'm not being facetious, I'm just trying to wade through your bullshit.
Re:
"People have heard of EA because they make games that lots of people have played"
That or they buy up companies that make great games and subsequently ruin the game franchise by being greedy i.e. mass effect 3.