Happy New Year everyone! Last year’s “The Numbers” post proved to be quite popular, so we decided to do it again. 2011 was yet another banner year for Techdirt.
We handled around 14.7 million visits last year (up from 2009’s 11M). Those visitors checked out the 3,923 stories that we posted and submitted 205,129 comments. Oddly, the #1 story for 2011 was one that was actually written in 2010, about the ubiquitous “Free Public WiFi” mystery. It turns out that a lot of people remain curious about all those “free public WiFi” ad hoc networks you see. Two stories about SOPA/PIPA graced the top ten, as well as the harrowing censorship tale of dajaz1.com. It appears that you folks are concerned about government censorship.
2011 was also a great year for the comment voting system. Congrats to Marcus Carab and Dark Helmet, who garnered the highest cumulative scores for insightful and funniest comments, respectively — and, amazingly, each came in second place to the other in the category they didn’t come in first. I sense a growing rivalry…
The top browser used by Techdirt readers was still Firefox (35%). Chrome, which lost by a narrow margin to IE last year, blew past IE’s 15% to 30%. And there are still nearly 100,000 that are, despite all of the best efforts of Microsoft to convince you otherwise, still inexplicably using IE6.
Mobile usage jumped up to 1.6M visits this year, which is nearly a 200% increase from 2010. 615k of those visits came from iPhones, versus 566k for Android and 322k from iPad. In aggregate, Apple devices did beat Android. iPhone beat out Android last year by nearly 2:1, so clearly that gap is quickly closing.
Where did this year’s traffic come from? Reddit jumped in the charts this year, referring 2.1M visits, up 277% from last year’s 557k. I’m a little saddened to see that Slashdot is definitely not what it used to be — referrals from them dropped by nearly a third last year. I suppose getting Slashdotted is no longer what it used to be. Continuing to perform quite well, however, are both StumbleUpon and HackerNews. Facebook also sent a decent amount of traffic.
To hear some of Google’s enemies (including politicians in Congress) tell the story, the only way sites get traffic is via search engines — and Google specifically. They act as though, if Google isn’t sending you tons of traffic, you don’t exist. Google definitely does send us a fair bit of traffic, but only about 20% of our actual traffic came from searches. We certainly value that 20%, but it definitely shows that you don’t have to rely on search traffic to get traffic. Even more telling, here are the top three search terms that brought people to Techdirt in 2011:
- techdirt
- sopa
- tech dirt
Where are you all coming from? It’s really not that different than in 2010. The vast majority of you are from the US. Canada is second, followed closely by the UK. After that, there’s a pretty sharp drop off to Australia, then Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. France, India and New Zealand round out the top 10. Last year, we noted that Japan narrowly beat out China to follow India as the leading Asian countries. This year (despite stories of how we’re sometimes blocked in China), China jumped into second place in Asia, followed by South Korea, who leap-frogged Japan. Brazil was tops in South America and South Africa was tops in Africa — same as in 2010.
All in all, people from 230 countries or territories visited Techdirt. Just like last year, there was a single visit from Christmas Island — though, last year, we had someone in our comments suggest that the single Christmas Island visit may have been him, and not really from Christmas Island.
Last year, we noted that the only countries that we appeared to get absolutely no visits from were… North Korea, Western Sahara & Chad. Western Sahara and Chad, once again, failed to send any visitors… but, in a stunning development, we got two visitors from North Korea. And, in case you were wondering, Belarus, whose new laws will make it difficult for people there to access many websites, actually sent over 1,000 visitors last year. Also, I have no idea why, but the nearly 1,000 visitors from Gibraltar spent the highest average time on the site of visitors from any other country/territory — averaging nearly 20 minutes per visit. People from Macedonia actually visited the most pages (on average) per visit — at just under 6 on average from over 3,500 visitors.
And, of course, this isn’t just about the odd facts, but about the overall community — with many of you being quite loyal, which we appreciate to no end. 1.5 million of the visits — or just over 10% came from people who visited Techdirt more than 100 times last year — and the vast majority of those (just under 1 million) actually visited the site more than 200 times. You people rock.
Anyway, thanks again to everyone for making yet another year of Techdirt awesome. Here’s to a fantastic 2012.
Top Ten Stories, by Unique Pageviews, on Techdirt for 2011:
- The History Of The (Fake) ‘Free Public WiFi’ You Always See At Airports
- SOPA Markup Runs Out Of Time; Likely Delayed Until 2012 [Update: Or Not…]
- Apple Continues To Insist Only It Can Use An Apple In A Logo; Threatens Small German Cafe
- Guy Who Created The TSA Says It’s Failed, And It’s Time To Dismantle It
- Craigslist Trying To Destroy The Life Of Someone Who Made Posting To Craigslist Easier
- Breaking News: Feds Falsely Censor Popular Blog For Over A Year, Deny All Due Process, Hide All Details…
- Company Thanks Guy Who Alerted Them To Big Security Flaw By Sending The Cops… And The Bill
- NY Times & LA Times Both Come Out Against SOPA & PIPA
- EU Officially Seizes The Public Domain, Retroactively Extends Copyright
- PROTECT IP Renamed E-PARASITES Act; Would Create The Great Firewall Of America
2011’s Top Ten Stories, by comment volume
- If You’re Arguing That Someone ‘Deserves’ Copyright, Your Argument Is Wrong (823 comments)
- Do A Little Dance, Make A Little Love…Get Bodyslammed Tonight (At The Jefferson Memorial) (457 comments)
- Judge Bans Handing (Factual) Pamphlets To Jurors; Raising First Amendment Issues (429 comments)
- TSA Agent Threatens Woman With Defamation, Demands $500k For Calling Intrusive Search 'Rape' (403 comments)
- Revisiting The Question Of Who Deserves Copyright (376 comments)
- PROTECT IP Renamed E-PARASITES Act; Would Create The Great Firewall Of America (376 comments)
- Senators Want To Put People In Jail For Embedding YouTube Videos (374 comments)
- Monkeys Don't Do Fair Use; News Agency Tells Techdirt To Remove Photos (372 comments)
- Why Is The Justice Department Pretending US Copyright Laws Apply In The UK? (351 comments)
- Breaking News: Feds Falsely Censor Popular Blog For Over A Year, Deny All Due Process, Hide All Details… (341 comments)
- Note that only 2 of the most commented stories were also among the top 10 most visited stories, once again showing that traffic and the number of comments don’t necessarily correlate.
2011’s Top Users, by comment volume
- The eejit – 3,963 comments
- Jay – 3,433 comments
- Marcus Carab – 2,255 comments
- Richard – 2,209 comments
- PaulT – 1,841 comments
- Hephaestus – 1,662 comments
- nasch – 1,456 comments
- Dark Helmet – 1,426 comments
- abc gum – 1,357 comments
- HothMonster – 1,313 comments
2011’s Most Insightful Users, as voted by the community
- Marcus Carab
- Dark Helmet
- Karl
- Richard
- Jay
- Chris Rhodes
- The eejit
- PaulT
- That Anonymous Coward
- E. Zachary Knight
2011’s Funniest Users, as voted by the community
- Dark Helmet
- Marcus Carab
- Capitalist Lion Tamer
- The eejit
- :Lobo Santo
- Chris Rhodes
- Gwiz
- Hephaestus
- ChurchHatesTucker
- That Anonymous Coward
Re:
Good point.. added now.
smaller site.
I like how the Reuter's article calls Reddit a "smaller site."
Alexa graph.
What does that make Reuters then?
Re: The "Propose" link is broken.. EOM
Oops, thanks for pointing that out. Fixed now.
Re: Re:
Yup, completely agree -- Walmart could completely swing the numbers the other way. Campaigns like this are notoriously difficult to quantify. I'm sure that Old Spice is thrilled with the campaign.
Re: Re: Er...
Sorry folks.. took care of it, and yes, we do need some "report this comment" type features amongst others -- it's on our list of things to do.
Re: these would not be 'exact' reproductions
Sure, I recognize that these prints may not have mass appeal, but wouldn't it behoove the historical society to try and get some help to find the FEW people that would actually pay for the physical prints at all?
I mean, the images on the site are low resolution and already have a big watermark on them, so I just don't see why the big copyright warning is even necessary.
Printroom even has a warning for the copyright setting when you create a gallery:
"We recommend that you only enable the copyright statement if you have particular copyright concerns, as it complicates the purchasing process and may affect your sales."
Re:
Aha.. yes. the left printout in a shared printer is a great analogy -- the printout would be face down, so you'd have to pick it up to look at what was on it, but there's no real social norm that would make you feel bad or creepy for just glancing at it.
Good one. Thanks.
Yah, I used the bus station analogy since Kerr used it in his post analyzing the case, so I just modified his analogy a bit.
The shared printer analogy works particularly well because it makes the additional distinction between a "shared space" and a "public" place.
Re: Re:
Exactly.. thanks Rose, and thanks everyone else who cleared up some of the in-game mechanics. Yah, I was most fascinated by the fact that Blizzard was about to clear over $2M in just four hours..
And it's also interesting that there's a "waitlist" for the pets -- I assume that's to avoid the glut of minipets that Rose was talking about as well..
Re:
Aha.. interesting, well even so, the only reason Blizzard can do this is because they have such absolute control over the game's economics.
They're able to peg the value of the celestial steed at $25 because they have so many artificial restrictions on what you can do with it.
However, it's even more interesting that Blizzard themselves are bound essentially by the social rules (ie.. it's unfair to "buy" your way through the game) of the WoW community -- which is why, I suppose, this mount does not afford any in-game advantages, as Rose described.
Re: No Way Will This Destroy The Game...
Aha.. thanks for the clarification Rose.. I do hope that Blizzard knows to not upset the delicate balance of gameplay by selling these pets.
Fielding the feedback..
Yes.. as you've all noticed, we've been trying out some new things here on Techdirt, namely the "sponsored conversations" -- we take our editorial integrity very seriously here at Techdirt, so we have been careful to always make the distinction that sponsors do not have any say over the content that goes into these posts, but rather, they are sponsoring the conversation around certain topics.
So, how it works is that, in this case, AMEX is sponsoring the topic around businesses and entrepreneurship -- and then we here at Techdirt just continue about our normal daily business writing about the things that we like to write about, and then, the posts that fall into this topic area get the sponsored treatment.
Furthermore, as you've probably also noticed (or, for some, not noticed -- since they keep talking to Mike on every single post).. We're growing here at Techdirt, and as a result, we've been adding some more voices to the site. And with that, we've learned that we need to be more upfront if an author is presenting a viewpoint that may disagree with the prevailing view on Techdirt. Part of this experiment is to see what would happen if we added some different views on the site, but we should be more upfront and clear when that's happening.
Anyway, my apologies if this post was confusing in any way or made you think that we're not the same old Techdirt that you're expecting. Apparently, we're not immune to screwing up either, so thanks for calling us out on it and keeping us honest.
Re:
In Fonovisa it was argued that people were going to the flea market FOR the CDs, so the thought was that the market knew about what was going on, and benefited directly from the infringing goods being there.
That said -- Fonovisa was in 1996. If Fonovisa were tried today, who knows if the ruling would be the same..
Re: Typo
Thanks A Dan... fixed now.
Re: Re: Re: Oh please
Yup.. you're completely right. If *I* were included in the book, I'd be thrilled.
But people *are* angry by the way they handled it, and it was shortsighted on the part of the publisher (who should know how authors think) to not realize that people would be pissed..
The fact that they said:
"We did want to contact each person quoted in the book; the publisher's legal advisors said it was not necessary under fair use guidelines."
Was a bit lame -- really? Hiding behind what your lawyers told you?
Re: Oh please
And yes.. I linked to Merlin Mann at the end of the post.
Re: Oh please
It's not a fair use/copyright issue at all -- the publisher here is most likely covered by fair use, but the issue here is that they clearly missed an opportunity to involve everyone in the project.
So, even though you may be legally "in the right" it doesn't necessarily mean that you should blindly proceed.
Re:
Agreed, there's nothing quite like a live symphony concert or a live baseball game.
But, for those of us that are limited either by funds or by location, it's nice that we now have the opportunity to catch some of the experience remotely.
Then, when we do get to see these performances live, we can appreciate them that much more.
Re: This is two so far today, Dennis...
Thanks for the vigilant eyes, DH... Fixed now.
Re: Uh...
Duly noted, DH.. you're completely right about the wall of text. I've long pestered Mike about walls of text, and here I am with my own.
In anycase, I've added a break to make it a bit more readable. Thanks for pointing that out.
Re: Really?
Related to this, the researchers found that the *number of tweets* had a good correlation to the opening weekend numbers. The sentiment (positive/negative) of the tweets did not really affect the first weekend numbers -- however, sentiment did start having an affect starting week 2.
So, the moral of this story is that a ton of chatter (good or bad) will get you a great opening weekend, but sustaining power is netted by if people actually liked it...