DannyB's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the favorites dept
This week's "favorites" post comes from DannyB.
Having never done the favorite posts before, I wasn't sure if I should. Since I didn't have to
pee, I hope I made the right decision.
The best laugh all week was
Man Tries To Patent Godly Powers; Justifies It By Pointing To Software & Business Method Patents. That makes sense in an insane sort of way. Multiple forms of insanity combined. He forgot to mention aliens. 'Nuff said.
Speaking of patents: Congress Happy To Knock Out Patents That Impact Financial Institutions... But Everyone Else?. Don't worry. This is good news in disguise.
Precedent: You protected Johnny from bad patents, why not me too? What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Microsoft To US Gov't: Hey, Only We Should Be Able To Use Patents To Shakedown Other Companies!. Nice hypocrisy there Microsoft. Live by the patent, die by the patent. (Apple, are you listening?)
56 pages of iTunes terms? Really? Can't we get a short version in one sentence? Try this: You agree to return to the Apple store each month and do whatever they tell you. I AGREE
Which brings me to
Music Service Simfy Files Complaint Over Apple Blocking Its iPad App. When you build a business on something controlled by a party with conflicting interests, be prepared to have the rug yanked out from under you. It's not the first time, and it won't be the last. (Disclaimer: Android fanboy talking.) Android lacks a single point of control. There are currently multiple Android app stores (e.g., Google, Amazon), with more on the way. (Will I get in trouble for saying "app store"?) If you don't like Google's store or its policies, approval process, etc, there is Amazon's store. More choice
(not less)
is a good thing.
I had to chuckle at
Former Obama Advisor Says Wikileaks Is Wonderful For The US Government. It's a shame the US government doesn't
understand the importance of anonymous public whistle blowing. Of course, maybe they do, but I'd rather not go there.
The next article was informative.
How Out Of Control Copyright Law Is Keeping Millions Of Books & Images Away From Scholars. I admit I had been one of those confused about the "science" and "arts" part of "useful arts and science". I didn't know copyrights were for science and patents were for useful arts. That profoundly affects what I think copyrights were intended to protect.
Next was Once Again, The Freedom Of Information Act Is Proving To Be Just That: An Act. If the Osama Bin Laden pictures are released, we learn nothing new. (Unless it would reveal something we didn't know! My mind races with possibilities if I go there.)
Otherwise, propaganda usage of the pictures is irrelevant.
Honest people could comply with FOIA.
If the government would act honestly most of the time, they would have credibility when they need to protect a secret.
Which leads to several ICE domain seizure favorites.
- The List Of Sites Challenging Domain Seizures
- Rojadirecta Sues US Government, Homeland Security & ICE Over Domain Seizure
- ICE Stalling On More FOIA Requests Concerning Domain Name Seizures
- Government working for private industry.
- Lack of due process, legal service, representation and response.
- Making a(nother) mockery of FOIA.
- Its ineffectiveness.
- Hurting unrelated subdomains; demonstrating a lack of understanding of how things actually work.
- Impacting sites outside the US.
Talk about the right hand of government not knowing what the left hand is doing. C'mon guys. Which do you want? The free flow of information or censorship and government control. It's a delusion to think you can have both.
I was happy to see continuing pushback on mass copyright infringement lawsuits and copyright trolling.
- From Two Nude Nuns Mass BitTorrent Lawsuits Down To None
- Judge Rules That Righthaven Lawsuit Was A Sham; Threatens Sanctions
- Denver Post Sued Over Righthaven Connection
- Those Who Settled With Righthaven Consider Taking Action; Righthaven Threatens Them With More Suits
Oh goodie. FBI Agents Getting More Power To Spy On People With Less Oversight. Why is this not surprising. CDA. DMCA. PATRIOT Act. ACTA. PROTECT-IP. Naked scanners. Patdowns. Controlling "rogue" websites. Government as a private police force, no due process. GPS tracking without due process. Making a joke of FOIA. Where does it end?
Maybe it just gets worse. US Trying To Extradite UK TVShack Admin Over Questionable Copyright Charges?. It turns out the US is not just trying, they're actually going to do it. Wow. The discussion on this topic says it all.
Summit Entertainment May Learn That You Can't File A Copyright Takedown Over A Trademark Issue. What to say? The title itself is the punch line. I hope that abuses of the DMCA starts resulting in some serious costs to the abuser.
Senators Unconcerned About Massive Unintended Consequences Of Criminalizing People For Embedding YouTube Videos. I should be shocked. But I'm too numb from other government actions. Clearly the senators don't give the south end of a northbound rat.
What did we learn? People in government should be required to have a full bladder. Which brings me back to where I started. (Oh, gotta run now. . .)


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bu, bu, but . . . . Piracy!
A TiVo allows me to squeeze out the last drops of value that remain in cable tv.
Re:
Patent and Copyright may not be working the way they were originally intended.
But they are working exactly as intended by current four* branches of government.
* be sure to count lobbyists as a branch of government
It's not silence first, it's CENSOR first, ask questions . . . maybe
Censor first. Ask questions later, maybe, if ever.
Re: Re: EASY!
That's easy! If content looks desirable, well made or professional, then it must be owned by the RIAA or MPAA.
Nobody else is capable of making anything good.
Re: Automating filtering
Filtering is not just about processing power.
It is about having technology to "recognize" content. That requires some basic level of sophistication if not some very basic level of intelligence.
Notice I said recognize CONTENT. Not recognize INFRINGEMENT.
Even Hollywood is unable to determine if a YouTube video is infringing. The left hand uploads authorized content that the right hand recognizes and issues a takedown for.
If Hollywood can't determine infringement, how can YouTube? At best, and that is at best, you can only recognize content. Not recognize infringement.
Finally, as an example of just how well this technology works, I would point no further than recognizing someone's nature video with birds singing as being owned by a major content producer, who then goes on to insist that they own it and it is a legitimate takedown.
The reason this nature video was flagged had nothing to do with processing power alone. It has to do with the recognition system not being sophisticated enough, let alone having some level of what we think of as intelligence.
Re: Re: Re: Bu, bu, but . . . . Piracy!
Yes, a "reasonable" argument from Hollywood is of the form:
Pirate Google . . .
Pirate YouTube . . .
Pirate Mike . . .
etc.
Re: Re: Bu, bu, but . . . . Piracy!
> Well to be fair, 500 TV channels pushing you content
> 24/7 is a LOT of material to upload ;-)
The fact that there is nothing good on is why I'm planning to get rid of cable.
It's all crap. For example, the History channel is all about conspiracies, aliens, theology from people who obviously haven't read the very texts they talk about, etc. Various "science" type channels are about haunted houses, ghosts, etc. Then there is reality tv.
Not only is it all crap, it's all reruns of the same crap.
Re: Re: Re: Re: He's one of 10 reverse-engineers
Sony vs. Connectix case (being discussed on Groklaw) points out that the result was that Connectix reverse engineering of Playstation was fair use of the internal private copies Connectix made of Sony's ROM. Connectix's compatible product contained no copies of any Sony code.
Re: What a shame!!
> I think Google made a mistake in not getting the
> patents when they were up for offer.
If these are the patents I'm thinking of, Google DID try to get them. Google made a huge bid. Google wanted to use them defensively against the bad guys who were already using patents against various Google partners.
Because these patents would have represented a useful defense against patent aggressors, the bad guys got together and collectively outbid Google. That is how the bad guys (eg, Apple, Microsoft, etc) got these patents.
Bu, bu, but . . . . Piracy!
The 72 hours per minute shows the ridiculousness of Hollywood's argument that YouTube is fueled by piracy.
At this rate, how long would it take to upload everything ever put onto a frame of film by Hollywood?
How can they argue with a straight face that YouTube is all about piracy?
Wake up!
YouTube is all about kick in the balls videos.
What? They left out Oracle?
Oracle wants to be in the patent trolling business. That appears to be the primary reason they bought the Sun before it went dark.
All that is necessary for Apple/Microsoft/Oracle to triumph is for Google men to do nothing.
Re: Hollywood: STFU and...
And your little dog* too.
* lobbyists
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Look, Battleship is really a great movie. Definitely worth your time -- and money. If you didn't like it, that's probably because you didn't see the 3D version. You should give it another try. Or two.
(no, actually, it's not. It's not a movie. It's a 1.5 hour joke.)
Re:
> Then hollywood will cry.
You misspelled sue.
Gatekeepers are important to the economy
Everyone should stop producing cars, clothes, food, homes, computers and get into the intellectual property business. It doesn't matter which one. Copyright. Patent. Trade Mark. Service Mark. Then sue everyone else.
Think of how much wealth this will generate. At one point the music industry estimated piracy as costing them some $74 TRILLION dollars. Just think if you could recover that amount by suing.
Realtors could actually stop showing homes and just fire off lawsuits -- and probably get more money for it. Think of the time and trouble saved. Think of the judgements from IP lawsuits as new wealth generated into the economy.
With so much wealth, we'll be drowning in IP lawsuit paper and nobody will need to produce homes, cars, clothes or food anymore.
It's a great plan. Tell your congresscritter!
Forced out?
Being unwilling to use hyperbole for the benefit of lobbyists and tyrant wannabes probably made him unsuited for the position.
Re: Re: It's not that simple
Listening to the radio, in public, if anyone else can hear it, could get you in big trouble with collection societies for (gasp!) public performance. (Even if that particular collection society doesn't own the rights to what you were listening to!)
Re: Re: Re:
He has only the personal attacks of the anonymous coward to fear.
Re:
Silly troll, haven't you heard? Ethan IS NO LONGER WORKING FOR Warner Music. Therefore he no longer is a slimy, weasely, back-stabbing asshole.
Re: Re: Yet another reason why
But this is worse than perjury. This needs a penalty far worse. Like an extra double strong stern warning not to do it again.
It should be like the UN threatening some bad acting country. If you don't stop that, we threaten we'll pass a resolution stating that we'll vote on another resolution condemning your actions!