But it doesn't look like they are asking you to pay for "Youtube," just those additional channels. Youtube isn't going away. To me it's like a Netflix within Youtube. If I see 3 or 4 good shows I might subscribe and if I don't I'll keep watching everything else I like to watch on Youtube.
By if the Crosley-Corcoran's own lawyer says that she doesn't have a copyright claim then wouldn't that have a material effect on whether or not 512(f) was abused?
But even more important here is how in the world someone could have a copyright claim on a picture of a hand flipping the bird?
According to that article there are over 2000 patents on Java. Just takes a little effort to find information. There's something called the Internet that has a ton of it. Just be careful because not everything that is said on the Internet is true. Especially in the comments sections of stories and blogs.
But Java does have some patents for it as does Flash. The technology underlying cloud services are patented to a great extent as is much of online shopping.
What does this have to do with the MAFIAA? This is just a scumbag that figured he could scam an old lady. That's bad enough without having to amp it up with a completely unfounded and unnecessary attack on anyone else.
Maybe I'm just cynical but if I was in the House or Senate I hope I would understand that my ability to be there is still dependent on voters. So how would I line my pockets but still stay in power? I'd do something exactly like this. The House just got $84 million for voting on CISPA and the Senate probably stands to make more than that voting on whatever bill they are going to vote on. By voting on opposite bills and never actually passing anything, the Senate can say it's the House's fault, the House can blame the Senate, and they both know they are OK with the voters because they don't pass either law.
I haven't read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but it seems strange that it took 19 articles to get to the right of free speech. Free speech, at least in this day and age, seems like it would be in the top 2 or 3 things anyone would worry about losing or not having.
I find it kind of sad that many news organizations have pre-written obits for many famous people so that they can try to be the first to announce it. Obviously they should spend a little more time on fact-checking and double checking what they are about to print or post online than trying to post the first obit about someone's death.
The legal system isn't the cause. The cause is all the laws that deal with patents AND the way the Secretary of Commerce and his or her head of the USPTO feel those laws need to be be enforced or ignored.
Re:
But it doesn't look like they are asking you to pay for "Youtube," just those additional channels. Youtube isn't going away. To me it's like a Netflix within Youtube. If I see 3 or 4 good shows I might subscribe and if I don't I'll keep watching everything else I like to watch on Youtube.
Re: Interesting fight, but...
By if the Crosley-Corcoran's own lawyer says that she doesn't have a copyright claim then wouldn't that have a material effect on whether or not 512(f) was abused?
But even more important here is how in the world someone could have a copyright claim on a picture of a hand flipping the bird?
Tiger pit..
I hope they let the kid heal up first. It's the only way to be have a apples to apples comparison about which environment is safer.
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/242046/sun_was_close_to_licensing_java_patents_to_google_for_28m.html
According to that article there are over 2000 patents on Java. Just takes a little effort to find information. There's something called the Internet that has a ton of it. Just be careful because not everything that is said on the Internet is true. Especially in the comments sections of stories and blogs.
Re: Re:
I think I'd prefer cloning.
Re:
But Java does have some patents for it as does Flash. The technology underlying cloud services are patented to a great extent as is much of online shopping.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
And that still has nothing to do with the story.
Re: What does this have to do with the MAFIAA?
Work for hire is COMPLETELY different than this case.
Re:
What does this have to do with the MAFIAA? This is just a scumbag that figured he could scam an old lady. That's bad enough without having to amp it up with a completely unfounded and unnecessary attack on anyone else.
Re: Re: Stop "Villifying" the Tool
No tool is inherently bad. However the people that use that tool can make it a tool used for a bad purpose or for a good purpose.
The idea of lobbying, in and of itself, also isn't bad but how we in the US have implemented that idea is very bad.
(untitled comment)
While utterly safe...
I see what you did there.
Maybe this isn't about cyber security at all, it's about money?
Maybe I'm just cynical but if I was in the House or Senate I hope I would understand that my ability to be there is still dependent on voters. So how would I line my pockets but still stay in power? I'd do something exactly like this. The House just got $84 million for voting on CISPA and the Senate probably stands to make more than that voting on whatever bill they are going to vote on. By voting on opposite bills and never actually passing anything, the Senate can say it's the House's fault, the House can blame the Senate, and they both know they are OK with the voters because they don't pass either law.
Re:
How can there even be a patent for selling glasses, over a network or otherwise, and with a picture or 3D model. This is madness!
Article 19
I haven't read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but it seems strange that it took 19 articles to get to the right of free speech. Free speech, at least in this day and age, seems like it would be in the top 2 or 3 things anyone would worry about losing or not having.
Re:
They like to have clear dockets so they can go play golf not read something that might help them do their job better.
sad?
I find it kind of sad that many news organizations have pre-written obits for many famous people so that they can try to be the first to announce it. Obviously they should spend a little more time on fact-checking and double checking what they are about to print or post online than trying to post the first obit about someone's death.
Re: Re: Lawyers and grifters trying to get unearned income.
The legal system isn't the cause. The cause is all the laws that deal with patents AND the way the Secretary of Commerce and his or her head of the USPTO feel those laws need to be be enforced or ignored.
Now this is popcorn worth...
Extinction level event? Will the judge just summarily execute them all? Stay tuned!
2 pieces of legislation?
Not that this is needed at all but if he's proposing it then why couldn't it be in the same bill?
Bachman
How in the hell has Michele Bachman raised $25M?