FTC Moves For A Restraining Order To
Stop Microsoft, Activision Blizzard Merger From Consummating
FYI
It's funny to see these guy rally to the defence of the "simple childlike joy of gaming" one second then flip to manufactured hysteria about gaming turning kids into monsters or corrupting them the next.
Maybe getting upset about xbox sleep cycles is a little dumb (increased boot times suck tho)Backhanded justification
Well yes, it was, actually.Unsupported claim
CSPC is a (too) powerful agencyOverbearing gov't boogey man
Talking about the possibility and “a need to study” is how that process starts.Slippery slope pearl clutching.
it’s at the direction of administration higher-ups who really are doing it cuz they hate fossil fuelsBiden's fault.
There aren’t tho. That simply isn’t true at all.Unsupported claim.
activist enviro groupAd homs when party line isn't toed. Surprised you didn't add socialist here.
I hate your ideas, you’re a fucking idiotAd homs on article author. I think I won conservative troll bingo. What's my prize?
Techdirt, for all your German plumbing needs.
For example, big-tech pushes its liberal ideology in America while submitting to authoritarian regimes and censoring that same ideology in other countries. Further, those same regimes are provided a platform and rarely face the same censorship shown toward conservatives in the United States.Pretty black and white: "We aspire to be like those regimes!"
So, I'm just curious what the Steiners actually wrote that provoked this.
To be clear, I'm not suggesting it's their fault or they deserved this, I would just love to see what must be the most brilliant pieces of biting sarcasm ever produced.
Ebay's behaviour in this, as an org, is fucking disgusting and their claims of "this isn't our corporate culture" ring pretty flat given the sanctioning of this on record.
Not sure what that has to do with suing Twitter on behalf of someone helping spread disinformation about COIVD
COVID spelt "COIVD" in this case. Appreciate the article as always :).
So the trademark thing is patently ridiculous. The Menards brand communicates "We're like Milorganite", not "We are Milorganite".
I'm sorta surprised they didn't take a more anti-competitive slant to their claim. Menards is obviously leveraging its position as a distributor of fertilizers to encourage users to buy their product. I'm not close enough to anti-competition nuances to know if it's over the line, but it certainly seems closer to it here than the trademark claim of "their lawn fertilizer shows a lawn, just like ours".
So apparently, you need two line breaks after a blockquote....
WHEREAS, the general assembly finds that the first amendment of the United States constitution asserts that the government "shall make no law abridging the freedom of the press";
The first amendment is great.and WHEREAS, freedom of the press in the United States is not absolute and is subject to certain restrictions, such as defamation law;
Haha, just kidding.
Your tears are like a delicious angsty candy. Thank you for coming here and taking the time to inform everyone how dead this site is.
Green crap marketing's stie has the following phone number: Phone: 800-136-446
This is not, to my knowledge, a valid phone number.
MazGoddamit, Cartman, stop trying to make "Maz" happen.
I disagree with this. Having private opinions vs. expressing them are two different things. Free speech is speech free from government censure, not free from consequences. Employers making decisions based on expressed opinion is completely reasonable.
Let's posit a scenario:
Famous author G.C. Paddleling, known for publishing the wildly successful "Fuzzy Paner" series, publishes a tweet along the lines of:
Everyone with brown eyes should have their left arm gnawed off by rabid dogs because [REASONS]
Are we supposed to just nod and say "Interesting?". It's an outrageous statement and the societal consequences of making such a statement are how individuals and private entities choose to respond to those statements. Those responses are themselves open to debate, but this argument is pretty weak.
I do think some of the debates can get a little... intense, but a lot of the stuff triggering this seems pretty objectionable to me, and worthy of some intensity in the response. Threats and violence aren't ok in these debates, so that certainly needs to be a line, but that's not what this letter is complaining about.
Once again, the people that are supposed to serve the public have failed to understand the public.
FTFY
Oh no
Agreed. Now I have to go watch... the Marvels...