I think this comes under the heading "Predatory Litigation".
"Predatory Litigation" would include the article on a_cademic a_dvantage which appears also in today's clips
The crap about a_cademic a_dvantage I am guessing was derived from using a "Reputation Defender" type scan and then processed using a robot.
Ugly
If this sort of process is allowed to continue the New Rules to the Net will become: "Post a comment: Get Sued". It will effectively suppress free speech on the Net. There will be cheering from certain areas
what content protection has been other than "laughable"?
from what I've read every sort of content protection devised thus far has been defeated in a few days if not a few minutes
"and said that as long as the site owner made any attempt whatsoever to block such deep linking, getting around those measures could represent infringement."
the result of which is that the above is an appropriate response
Re: meh
tee hee
someplace last week i read that 30% of the time people spend online goes to FB. and suckerberg ain't happy. like AOL of the past: he want's it all.
AOL's model stagnated. it can't happen soon enough for fools' book
Re:
people here will wake up and realize that much of the "FREE!" is just a bullshit come on to get access to their personal information.
Their "business model" is similar to TV. In Television what is sold is audience and it is sold to the advertisers
in FoolsBook it's the same: you are being sold.
everytime you see something for "free" it is good to ask: who is selling what to whom.
Re: Re: Re: The real trade secret
How'd they get that?
off all those "Friend" links plus a monster AI program
Re: Re: Follow me @glynmoody ... on Google+
FB,Google "competitors in the same game"? : ABSOLUTELY.
That would be why they created Buzz and now G+
Re: Facebook == evil
we don't call it "Fools' Book" for nothing
Predatory Litigation
I think this comes under the heading "Predatory Litigation".
"Predatory Litigation" would include the article on a_cademic a_dvantage which appears also in today's clips
The crap about a_cademic a_dvantage I am guessing was derived from using a "Reputation Defender" type scan and then processed using a robot.
Ugly
If this sort of process is allowed to continue the New Rules to the Net will become: "Post a comment: Get Sued". It will effectively suppress free speech on the Net. There will be cheering from certain areas
laughable protection
what content protection has been other than "laughable"?
from what I've read every sort of content protection devised thus far has been defeated in a few days if not a few minutes
"and said that as long as the site owner made any attempt whatsoever to block such deep linking, getting around those measures could represent infringement."
the result of which is that the above is an appropriate response