They both said "Yes" and "No". Snowden's is the technical reply, that if done right, encryption works, but he also say it's usually not done right. Germany gave the practical response, that it's usually possible to decrypt communications, but it depends upon the type and quality. Yea, they actually said the same thing.
Using terrorism to justifying domestic spying means that the terrorists have won. You live in fear, you are paranoid, you reduce the liberty of your citizen. You have become the terrorist.
What's with the fair use notice? "This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner".
Is that a boiler plate anti-takedown statement, or what content are they talking about being copyrighted?
Moneymaker's book is freaking excellent for "not a poker book." Straight up story of a dude that's just a dude who likes to bet. What's he do right after his win? Spends 15k at a strip club. What do you do in Vegas if you only took 10k and you can't leave until pay the tab? Call up Chip Reese to spot you.
She was fine at the start, but when she "paced" (walked along with) the male and then the female officer it was spooky behavior. Then she confronted them.
The cop asked her to stand "down there" rather than the 5 feet away she was when she was argumentatively questioning them. (Her first question was possibly legitimate, and she got a sufficient answer to it "Safety check". Her second question "who's safety is in danger" was subjectively argumentative. She refused to move and refused to give her ID.
I'm quite good here with the cops, again. I should have to recommend that a watcher stand at least 20 feet away (30 would be better), not pace around the cops, and not harass them with rhetorically questions, and lastly comply when the ask you to move away.
In this case, it might be sufficient to be concise. "She confronted the cops. She shouldn't have."
Of course, seldom
It was done in a "very, very minimal way, very seldom,"
because "We have very few and have limited use."
I'm sure that if they had a couple hundred thousand, it would have rather been done in a "very, very maximal way, very liberally."
Title is trollish, they said the same thing.
They both said "Yes" and "No". Snowden's is the technical reply, that if done right, encryption works, but he also say it's usually not done right. Germany gave the practical response, that it's usually possible to decrypt communications, but it depends upon the type and quality. Yea, they actually said the same thing.
because Terrorism
Using terrorism to justifying domestic spying means that the terrorists have won. You live in fear, you are paranoid, you reduce the liberty of your citizen. You have become the terrorist.
Prevention
Intensive government surveillance would have prevented Harry Whittington getting shot on a hunting trip, too.
O.D.D.
Collecting Billions Of Phone Records Could Prevent Next 9/11, Boston Bombing
So could not pissing people off. Try not being such an asshat, Mr. Authority.
(untitled comment)
Oh, is that why it takes Oracle months to fix Java exploits.
Oh shit!
I hit ctrl-c, ctrl-v by accident.
(untitled comment)
What's with the fair use notice? "This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner".
Is that a boiler plate anti-takedown statement, or what content are they talking about being copyrighted?
Re:
Yes, CNN was different back then. That war was sensational enough, they didn't have to sensationalize everything to make people watch it.
CNN is much worse now.
Re: Weeks to go ?
...what is to become of the leftover money ?
You put it in the fridge, and eat it at midnight after a couple days.
(untitled comment)
IIRC. Was a couple years ago that the U.S. stated that cyber attacks will be considered acts of war. Looky us, engaging in proactive war.
(untitled comment)
Moneymaker's book is freaking excellent for "not a poker book." Straight up story of a dude that's just a dude who likes to bet. What's he do right after his win? Spends 15k at a strip club. What do you do in Vegas if you only took 10k and you can't leave until pay the tab? Call up Chip Reese to spot you.
Classic.
Re: Re:
"I'm not able to view video at work"
She was fine at the start, but when she "paced" (walked along with) the male and then the female officer it was spooky behavior. Then she confronted them.
The cop asked her to stand "down there" rather than the 5 feet away she was when she was argumentatively questioning them. (Her first question was possibly legitimate, and she got a sufficient answer to it "Safety check". Her second question "who's safety is in danger" was subjectively argumentative. She refused to move and refused to give her ID.
I'm quite good here with the cops, again. I should have to recommend that a watcher stand at least 20 feet away (30 would be better), not pace around the cops, and not harass them with rhetorically questions, and lastly comply when the ask you to move away.
In this case, it might be sufficient to be concise. "She confronted the cops. She shouldn't have."
Re: Re: Cunt Manor
(I'm not anonymous, quit calling me that.)
Re:
Yes, assuming a bug isn't a bug is a poor choice for an article, imo.
Re: religious perspective
You can still wish them to go to Hell. Whether or not it will affect them is up to their religion.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I hate numbers
Dude, there is no month #15. 15 would be the day field.
11 - 5 = 6 months. 6 + 12 = 18. Ta da.
Reality
Well, he said he's not in reality, so you can assume the rest is not real. Easy out.
Re: Re: Re: He went full retard.
omg, I didn't know the six-second youtube clip linked by kym had alerady suffered a takedown, LOL
Re: Re: He went full retard.
Careful where you right it down; ensure it's 'fair-use'. ;)
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/full-retard