To paraphrase out_of_the_blue himself: "your problem is that you refuse to generalize."
Blue actually believes that generalizing gives us the right answer. Nuance is non-existent. You can't try things on a case by case basis. Rich people are bad because being rich makes them bad. Anyone who says "some rich people are bad" is an idiot for even considering the possibility of the existence of a non-bad rich person.
It's the same for everything. He probably doesn't like food, or likes all food. Because "some food is bad" wouldn't be generalizing, and blue won't accept anything except blanket statements and generalizing.
"Will this file note that the two boys "pointed pencils at each other and made shooting noises?" Or will it state something to the effect that the boys broke the school's policy on violence and threatening behavior? My guess is the latter, which will allow anyone perusing the record to imagine the worst."
What is this? An empty comment? It's a giant white rectangle! You haven't showed me any of Mike's positions! No links or anything, not even your name! Ack, it's a blank name! You don't exist, this comment never happened.
They should make their own list, call it the 707 list or whatever, "list of douchebag countries that have stupid lists used to manipulate other countries on behest of their corporate overlords." Make it one country long, and write "United States of America" on it.
Oh, so all this is about out_of_the_blue complaining that some aren't quick to stereotype others. This explains a lot. He can't accept that a blogger somewhere says "this rich guy is bad, that rich guy is bad", no, he won't shut up until it's "the Rich(TM) are bad! all of them! blarghablargha!"