"Every officer who swore to the bogus search timeline should be given maximum judicial side-eye every time they take the stand for the rest of their careers."
Uh, I'm unclear as to how they should even HAVE careers after their perjury convictions.
Given that Canada is ALREADY facing a $500 million claim from Eli Lilly over 'potential lost price gouging opportunities', I can't help but wonder if this study takes the costs of ISDS settlements into account in coming up with the tiny net gains. If they're not already counted in there, the net effect could actually be negative.
This reminds me of the Arthur C. Clarke story about beaming propaganda-laced soft porn from satellites....
Um, how do you spell 'N-S-A'??
Is this SERIOUSLY the same David Cameron who flew to Paris to be seen marching in support of free speech???
Until quite recently, 'Hate Speech' WAS a crime - in Canada:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/06/27/hate-speech-no-longer-part-of-canadas-human-rights-act/
'Shopping' implies that you pay for what you take. This is armed robbery, plain and simple.
This story just made it to the top level in the Google News Feed under 'Technology' - yay!
Politicians? The NSA? The entertainment industry? C'mon, don't leave us hanging like this...
...or at least pretend :-) that this will also apply to Harris Corp's 'Stinger' contract provisions!
...of how those 'Peelian Principles of Policing' are SUPPOSED to work: when the citizens respect the work being done, they will support, even actively assist, the efforts of the police.
In said court, anyone would also be able to seek compensation for any damages resulting from invalid takedown orders.
Anyone. Any damages.
If he had just followed the nice policeman's instructions and 'confessed' that he really meant shooting fellow students, then everything would have turned out OK. That he insisted on telling the truth.... Well, that's his own fault, now isn't it?
..then let's 'nationalize' the NSA!
Oh, wait....
From the article:
"I think they received a lot of backlash from their fans...They described it as a maelstrom of fan uprising," Boyce said.
Yup, just minutes ago:
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/dc-entertainment-reverses-decision-gives-ok-superman-logo-160312672.html
The Province of Ontario just announced that it has conducted a study which shows conclusively that merely having the screen of an electronic device visible to you causes sufficient distraction to degrade your driving as much as if you were drunk. Consequently, the police will now charge you if the screen of a device is visible to you. Period. And clearly, there can be no appeal of this; if you're stopped, you're guilty.
Here's EVERYTHING you need to know about this study and the new law: the cops and their laptop computers are exempt.
"That seems like asking the NSA "can this system be abused?" and the NSA saying.....
[MontyPython] "Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, not at all! No, no, no. No. No. Well, yes. A bit. A little bit. Well, quite a bit, actually. In fact, almost totally." [/MontyPython]
Ooops, my link didn't appear:
http://www.cbc.ca/ns/beyondtheheadlines/2013/04/social-media-demands-justice-for-rehtaeh.html
"...enabled much greater surveillance oversees"
'Oversees' or 'overseas'?? Quite a difference in meaning for one little letter...