Crade's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the favorite-them-up dept
This week's favorites post comes from crade
Happy Saturday to the workers. I guess we have another week of dirty tech and it would be good to review, summarize, and have a look at the best posts of the week. We aren't going to, though; we are going to have a look at the ones I happened to take a fancy to instead.
Now I am a great lover of irony and one of the things I have found the most ironic about this whole ever-encroaching copyright "cage of security" is that while the biggest pushers for a smaller cage claim it's all for the protection of the artists, they are near legendary for their constant mistreatment of those artists. Not only that but copyright is one of the strongest tools they have used to do it. So it was in the heyday of vinyl and so it is today. So, here they are again, using copyright legislation to force the takedown of the work of an emerging artist. And using their stricter rules to censor people trying to speak against them and to keep people from trying to be artists all while Senator Leahy claims there is no First Amendment issue at all.
Ironic enough? Ha! It gets better. At the same time that the record labels use stricter laws to censor new music, they are also breaking the law themselves. The artists are lining up to sue the labels for infringment and the record labels could owe them up to $2 billion. Of course making sure artists get paid for their hard work is the labels' greatest desire, their raison-d'être and certainly the reason they need to make the security cage so tight we can't breathe.
I know I shouldn't find this stuff funny, but I can't help it.
Besides being a lover of irony, I am a somewhat lawfully minded individual. I believe in the law (to a decent extent). Laws are decided jointly, to a minimum extent (if they were not, there would be rebellion), and when the law is wrong, or bad, I believe it needs to be addressed, not reinterpreted to do "less" harm, nor ignored nor casually broken. Now laws that are wrong are not easy to fix, certainly my opinion is not going to do it, and I'm not entirely convinced even logical arguments from the Harvard Business Review, explaining how big content is strangling innovation, are going to get the job done. In order to get laws changed, we need outrage.
The completely unjustified secrecy around ACTA generated some nice controversy and got a few people asking questions, and now with the TPP, they may be doing the same thing. Splendid! Alzheimer's Institute of America directly interfering with Alzheimer's research by suing a bunch of other researchers has the potential to ruffle a few feathers. Although the ridiculous liability issues Google and Yahoo are facing (Google is being found liable for its Autocomplete Suggestions and Yahoo for its users being able to search for infringing movies) are over in Italy this week, perhaps it is a sign of things to come. Or maybe it will piss them off enough to start doing more about the issue in general.
We have seen that people are willing to get up in arms about the hyperbolic amount of cashola involved in copyright infringement lawsuits, so maybe it's a good thing that the record companies aren't letting up on that front, as well, and are still appealing to try to get Joel Tenenbaum to pay $675,000 for downloading a measly 30 songs. Sliding in at the last minute, Denmark's recent decision to endorse retroactive copyright extensions sure seems outrageous to me, so here's hoping it makes some waves.
So thats what I come to Techdirt for. A little humor, and hopefully some pot stirring and a bit of hope for the future!

(untitled comment)
"An exception from criminal liability is made if the act is justifiable in view of its purpose and other circumstances, and that provision includes journalistic work, according to the committee."
I'm trying to picture circumstances where someone is upset about some innocous photo that was taken for no good reason.
(untitled comment)
Gamers to Gears of War designer:
Let us know how that works out for you.
Re:
Really? You are going to delete all my replies to your post that completely proved Mike is right and you were lying?? Why have you done that?
(untitled comment)
Bad law comes from bad legistlators and bad judgement.
Bad cases are a given.
(untitled comment)
You're assuming that he means the gov't may have used the info to stop 9/11.. Perhaps he means the terrorists wouldn't have bothered trying if everyone was already terrorized to that point.
Re:
My thoughts are imho even your article says Hadopi is dead/dying..
The only thing that made Hadopi different/controversial is the threat of suspending internet, which your article says is going away. That was the stick.. What else is left? Three strikes and then more strikes? The core of Hadopi was the suspension, not the strikes.
It also says that the Hadopi agency is being disbanded and they are going to dump whats left of it on some existing agency to do in their spare time.. Not exactly what I would call thriving.
(untitled comment)
"was fined but innocent"
Not true, he was guilty. You just don't actually need to infringe on any copyrights or do anything wrong to be guilty.
(untitled comment)
"because music managers had told him: "We're sorry, that has already been on YouTube." "
I think you misunderstood and they mean your music is nothing special because *other* people have posted a bunch of their own *very similar* to youtube...
Either that or someone should tell Justin Beiber that his youtube videos will wreck his career.
Re:
Indeed, it's obviously the civies fault for getting in the way of IRA gunfire.
Re: Re: Oooh, softball! -- Hear Mike ranting about Google's surveillance?
I sincerely hope for his/her sake that he/she is getting paid for it.
Re: Oooh, softball! -- Hear Mike ranting about Google's surveillance?
That would be the part about "Tech Companies loadly denying handing over data" in contrast to the telcos in the article.
(untitled comment)
The problems with software patents are certainly not exclusive to software patents. They just look worse because of the volume of activity in that area.
Re: Re: It's a cheap shot, but I can't resist
I can see people still playing them if they have them.. What I don't understand is how people still buy them. I still have NHL 2k4 or something for PS2, and it's not a bad game at all, but I don't need to buy a roster update for it for 60$ every year.. I mean, who cares what names are skating around?
(untitled comment)
Of course, knowing Sony, they will probably change their mind a year or so after everyone buys one and roll out a forced update to lockdown used game sales anyway.
(untitled comment)
"It might seem a better thing for Sony to simply say they won't allow the kind of used game pocket-picking that MIcrosoft is codifying"
To me, this does not seem like a better thing. Certainly it's a better thing for Sony not to provide the ability for or encourage shutting down used games, but imho they should not be saying "if your game has DRM that restricts used game sales, it's not welcome on the PS3" either. The less controlling they are of the content that runs on their platform, the better I think.
Re: Mental Gymnastics
If thats how he parsed the question, he didn't pick one of the answers anyway, so it would be akin to being asked "have you stopped beating your wife", answering with "I never started", then when you are proven to be lying, saying it was the least untruthful answer.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Idiot
talk is cheap.
Re: Will Mike welcome The Debate On GOOGLE'S Surveillance?
I don't think Mike gets to decide any policies on google's surveillance, but you can "debate" at him until you are blue (now I get it!) to no result if you like.
You could debate with google all you like too until you finally figure out that they don't decide the rules either, but just play by them.
Re: Politician ignores tough issue until forced to acknowledge it
They are in jail.
Re: Re: Idiot
The answer to which should always be:
Yes, so what are you going to do about it?