BearGriz72's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the government-for-the-people? dept
To lead off I have to say that Senator Ron Wyden is making me prouder to be an Oregonian every week. When he called out the Obama administration on trying to do an end run around Congress by allowing the USTR to agree to ACTA without Congressional ratification, it made me want to cheer. Then the New York Times jumped into the fray and filed suit against the federal government for not revealing its interpretation of the PATRIOT Act, something Senators Wyden and Udall have been agitating about for weeks.
This week has been a morass of stories about security issues including wiretapping Skype and vulnerabilities at American Express; as well as government and corporations trying to break the Internet. In response we're seeing alternative DNS systems show up, as well as more backlash against PROTECT IP (AKA: the Internet censorship bill).
From the governmental-idiocy dept: We have California governor Jerry Brown leading off with the ridiculous notion that it is OK to search your mobile phone during a traffic stop without a warrant, even though the California legislature said no. Apparently, in California, "it's better for the courts to decide" than our elected representatives. Next up is the news that the Taiwanese government is putting together a "patent bank" to Protect Taiwanese Companies Against Patent Lawsuits. I think Mike said it best with, "... when governments... have to create special institutions to protect their own companies from the patent system. Shouldn't that raise questions about the patent system itself?" Back to the US we have the winner of the "it would be funny if it wasn't true" award for the week: an Environmental Protection Agency agent manufacturing a case/evidence so that he could spending more time with his mistress. In addition, apparently releasing the office phone numbers of public affairs staff the Department of Homeland Security poses "a clearly unwarranted invasion" of employee privacy.
My honorable mention for the week is: Mike's article on a member of the EU Parliament (Christian Engstrom) of the Pirate Party with a blog post about how copyright law today simply doesn't mesh with current technology and that the laws we are passing have the effect of making nearly everyone a criminal.
Finally for the sheer humor of it, the request from Aiplex (apparently an Indian anti-piracy group) for Techdirt to take down a post on another site! Granted the post is on a copycat blog that appears to just scrape Techdirt posts, but for basic understanding of the interwebs, it is a fail of the first order.

Epic Facepalm!
"For those of you who aren't suffering face-palm-induced concussion syndrome"
http://i377.photobucket.com/albums/oo213/Sick020/picard-facepalm.jpg
http://cdn.iwaste somuchtime.com/October-18-2011-20-12-49-DoubleFacePalm.jpg
http://picardfacepalm.com/
Re: Re: Re: Re: Recording
Gots to love the Popehat...
Re: "transfer it to the internet"
I don't know about anybody else, but my phone does this automatically, as soon as I take a picture or video it is 'automagicly' uploaded to at least two locations (Google+ & Dropbox) almost immediately.
Now if the police did seize my phone before it uploaded, even if they turned it off or shielded it from RF (e.g. a faraday bag), it would still auto-upload as soon as it got a good cell network signal (both of these apps have the option for uploading via Wi-Fi only, but I chose the upload over BOTH cellular and wifi options specifically for this reason).
Now, you could say that if they have access to my phone then the police could crack my phone lock and then access my Google+ and Dropbox accounts and delete the "offending" image/video, and that is true, however Dropbox has a feature where you have to enter a pin code to access it (but it still uploads updates automatically), so they would have to crack that as well.
The upside of this is it gives me time to access either of those services from another device and copy/share the file so that it can not be ultimately destroyed.
See Also: THIS and This2
OMG The funny! I can't stop laughing!!!
"It was when the Court realized Plaintiffs engaged their cloak of shell companies and fraud that the Court went to
battlestations."
"As evidence materialized, it turned out that Gibbs was just a redshirt."
"Third, though Plaintiffs boldly probe the outskirts of law, the only enterprise they resemble is RICO. The federal agency eleven decks up is familiar with their prime directive and will gladly refit them for their next voyage."
Finally for the "insightful"...
"Without better technology, prosecuting illegal BitTorrent activity requires substantial effort in order to make a case. It is simply not economically viable to properly prosecute the illegal download of a single copyrighted video."
We the People?
Anyone else think that petitions.whitehouse.gov needs a "Report this Petition as STUPID!" button?
Re: Re: Re: "the technology is coming one way or the other"?
..."inability to register an account"...
He can't any more, somebody else already registered OotB...
Re: Something about Mike being a pirate or something.
Well we warned the "real" OotB that if he didn't register his handle then someone else would...
He has no one but himself to blame.
Re: Re: SO no US address = immune from all prosecution?
+1 for the Futurama reference!
http://i.qkme.me/35p5ss.jpg
Re: Re: CCleaner CAN be a tool for securely deleting (wiping) files...
But it is not set up that way by default, and takes some knowledge of the software & how to configure it to do that job.
[Full Disclosure: I use Piriform's CCleaner on a regular basis, both in its default use as a tool to clean-up my HDD (& windows registry and temp files, etc.) as well as for it's ability to provide secure file deletion]
See: http://www.howtogeek.com/113382/how-to-use-ccleaner-like-a-pro-9-tips-tricks/
See Also: https://securityinabox.org/en/ccleaner_main
Side Note: When CCleaner securely deletes files, it renames them with all Zs in the file name (for example, ZZZZZZZZ.ZZZ) for increased security.
And direct from the horse's (Piriform) mouth...
Re: "Because this was easier than just removing tax breaks giant corporations enjoy?"
Re: Re: Unfair burden?
Re: "Thank goodness one of our senators has a brain."
Oregon FTW! (Again)
Re: Re: Change the name...
"Fox's A$$-Hat" FTW!
UPDATE: ThinkGeek gets even Shinier!
Yet another reason why I don't buy iCrap...
Along with those previously arbitrary walls, said "Apple morality", their closed source proprietary bullshit, and the distinct lack of functional interoperability (without hacking/cracking/unlocking/whatever) with non-Apple products/software.
Support FOSS & Open-source hardware!
Re: Re: "That is also the law in Oregon"
That was supposed to say {{Citation Needed}} at the top of my previous comment.
Re: "That is also the law in Oregon"
>
I live in Oregon, I've never heard of this law. I routinely use the mapping function of my phone without a problem, and I have discussed the handsfree requirements (Bluetooth sends out radio signals BTW) with the cops I know & this has never come up.
Re: Driving Distracted
So, now it is legal to use a paper map, but not a software map, and this MAKES SENSE to you?!?
Re: Re: Comment all in the tag:
Again, if you created a profile, this would not be a problem....
Still not clear on why you refuse to do so. Techdirt/Floor64/Mike already has your email $ IP Address Etc. What are you afraid of?
Darn it!
I ran out of popcorn!