If I remember correctly, you cannot sue a member of Congress for slander based upon what they say in the House. Can you sue the participants in the senate hearing for slander? As you stated, Mike, Snowden doesn't fall under the category of "traitor" so is he able to sue the members of the senate hearing who did call him a traitor? I must admit that if I were a lawyer I'm not sure I would take up that challenge but it would be interesting to understand the legal aspects of such a lawsuit.
Welcome to the Pokemon generation. The analysts grew up with the mentality that they needed to catch all of the pokemon in order to "win". Now they want to catch all of the data in order to "win". Anxiously looking forward to seeing what happens when the Grand Theft Auto generation is in charge.
Speaking of leaks I hear that Depends has a new ad campaign with General Keith B. Alexander, the Director of the National Security Agency. It's his picture with the slogan: "If only we had used Depends you wouldn't be seeing us now."
Where I work everything goes through a proxy server. Almost 20,000 of us using the same IP address. When I go from WiFi hotspot to WiFi hotspot I change my IP address. If I leave a WiFi address and go to 3G my IP address changes.
I can understand a more localized ruling, such that if you change your IP address to avoid a C&D order, but generic IP address changing is so common place that the judge himself is probably guilty of it every day and he doesn't know it.
Since Ms. Harrop has no problems with having information stored but not looked at then she should have no problem with me getting copies of her bank statements, tax returns, University records and sex tapes. I won't look, I'll just keep them safe. Trust me.
So, how did the U.S. go from "Leader of the Free World" to the "Lance Armstrong of the Free World". I have seen pariahs with better press than the U.S. at the moment. By the way, does a candidate for U.S. President (or any other political office) need to be inside the country on election day or can they be in, say, Russia?
I am terribly sorry, Mr. Masnick, but by informing us, the public, of the misdeeds of the current administration you have just now "aided the enemy". Please be advised that the Secret Service, the NSA and the MPAA, will be arriving at your place of work (or wherever your cell phone may be currently located) within moments to perform a discrete yet thorough examination of all body parts and orifices. Do not attempt to use your phone as you will just receive busy signals and, as per usual, your WiFi access will be compromised. Thank you for being a resident of Penal Colony 26.
Isn't one of the big selling points about gun control the fact that many people want to be "armed" in case they need to protect themselves from the government? With Homeland Security they ""... focus a little more on that, domestic terrorism and certain groups that are anti-government". Shouldn't this mean that Homeland Security should be monitoring members of the NRA?
Tim said that with regard to an angry customer base "For companies like EA, the customer base is large enough that it can usually be shrugged off". But can it? An angry customer based can be ignored if it is quiet, but what about when it is vocal?
The SOPA protests last year became very vocal and very visible. They made an impact on society because they were so vocal in their disagreement. Is the problem with EA not the fact that they ignore their customer base, but the fact that their customer base expects this of EA and, as a result, does not do anything about it? What if a "Don't Buy EA" movement were started that was vocal, visible and large? I think that at that point EA would have to deal with their customer base. With the recent unexpected departure of their CEO changes are on the horizon and it may be the most opportune time to speak out.
To be honest, from the piece that I read it really looks like they are talking about iTunes and not necessarily podcasting in general. For example, Apparatus for disseminating a series of episodes represented by media files via the Internet as said episodes become available seems more like iTunes than anything else. So, when is he suing Apple?
Or, rather, the Science Fiction Writers of America:
Short Story: Less than 7500 words
Novelete: Between 7500 and 17,500 words
Novella: Between 17,500 words and 40,000 words
Novel: Over 40,000 words
So, what we have here are people selling a "Novelette". The definitions were, I believe, originally created for the Nebula Awards.
As for the benefit of a novelette or "e-Single", it should be a very inexpensive way to determine whether or not the author, their style, or the subject matter are something you are comfortable with and enjoy. If, however, Publishers get hold of this they will try to turn a large novel into a lot of novelettes and try to get more money out of the audience for the same price. Imagine Fall of Giants by Ken Follet coming out in 25 pieces at $0.99 each instead of the $9.99 novel.
... when your competition is China, Pakistan, Libya, Jordan, Russia, Vietnam, etc. I see that many countries that are more "enlightened" than the U.S. where never surveyed. If the U.S. did not end up near the top of the list I would have been very surprised. However, I have no real confidence in the report as being nearly as accurate as it could be due to the sponsor group and the lack of information about how the USA was scored.
I'm a little confused. I went on to the UltraViolet site and tried to register an account. I couldn't because there is no option for Canada. I can register if I am in the United States or the United Kingdnm but not in Canada. So, is this because:
A) Canadians are too smart to go for this
B) The MPAA has no understanding of their target audience
C) The MPAA has too many legal hurdles to overcome to offer their own movies in different countries
D) All of the above
The Alberta government is publishing all of its travel expenses (http://alberta.ca/InternationalTravelExpenses.cfm) although this is as a result of a scandal earlier in the year with regard to a high level member of the government abusing his travel expenses.
But as Eric Newton said "If itís public, it should be just there"
As a Canadian I sometimes need assistance in understanding American "rules" because every so often they don't make a lot of sense. So, from what I can gather, even if you are merely accused of copyright infringement from an automated bot that may or may not be accurate, you start rising up the escalation ladder in this "Six Strikes" process.
So, for example, if someone knew the IP address of NBC.COM (22.214.171.124) and then started to accuse NBC.COM of infringing on their copyright by going through their provider, they could take NBC off the Internet? And this seems logical to people? If someone knew the IP Addresses of the NBC executive team they could adulterate the process to get all of them "barred" from the Internet. And the copyright industries don't think that this is going to turn around and bite them in the butt?