Sophisticatedjanedoe / FightCopyrightTrolls Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the not-just-about-trolls dept
Hi Techdirt! I'm known to this and other tech blog communities as sophisticatedjanedoe (or SJD). I run an anti-shakedown, anti-copyright-troll opinion blog Fight Copyright Trolls, which, I'm sure, most of you know: Techdirt often links to my posts, especially recently, since we all have been watching an illustrious show of SS Prenda sinking slowly but steadily.
Some might expect that my favorite posts would be all about Prenda, but no — I have wider interests than fighting ethically handicapped lawyers. Still I'm quite happy that copyright trolling disease that has penetrated the legal system is finally gaining attention from the general public. Techdirt, together with ArsTechnica and TorrentFreak (and, recently, Popehat), have been pivotal in this respect.
The only Prenda-related post I want to specifically recommend is about the ISPs' appeal over former RIAA lobbyist judge allowing Prenda to get info on over 1,000 John Does. This post features an amicus curiae brief filed by four respected advocate organizations: EFF, ACLU, Public Citizen and Public Knowledge. To date, this is one of the most comprehensive and beautiful briefs on the topic, a must read to anyone who follows the copyright trolling phenomenon.
For some reason, the story I remember the most is the one about the North Carolina politicians and car dealers trying to outlaw the direct sales of Tesla cars in their state. It makes me sad and angry when special interest groups, mostly incumbents, attempt to derail progress: not that it is unnatural or unexpected, but the BS smuggled as public concern is always unbearable to hear.
It is not much better when certain groups try to widen revenue streams quietly. The story about the Florida Department of Transportation doing it at the expense of public safety — by decreasing yellow traffic light intervals (to increase the number of red-light tickets) — is, unfortunately, also not unexpected.
Good news is that the most innovative area — the Internet — is largely immune to the tricks that authorities can forcefully impose on citizens. It is mind-boggling that certain power structures can't grasp the futility of trying to put the cat back in the bag when it comes to the digital world. This week we watched how the government tried to suppress the dissemination of the first fully 3D-printed gun blueprint using some "export regulations." "Export-import of digital goods" concept is irreversibly dead in the Internet age.
Meanwhile the incumbent entertainment gatekeepers continue their delusional fight against the Internet — pretending to fight piracy, while study after study (this time commissioned by the UK government) finds that top downloaders are top spenders. The following stories remind us one more time that the collateral damage in this war — the civil liberties — is truly an international concern. In the USA, the MPAA thinks that considering fair use before filing a DMCA takedowns is a crazy idea. In the UK, the country's recording industry, dwelling on the success of the last year censorship, plans a new wave of blockades — over two dozen new victims (including a relatively good player Grooveshark) — all without trial and conviction. And the Germany's GEMA does not want to yield its status of the worst collection society in the world.
Fortunately, the new generation does not sit idle. I was moved by the news of Peter Sunde, of The Pirate Bay & Flattr, planning a run for the EU parliament.
To finish on a lighter note, read about a pathetic and sloppy usage of Photoshop by the Church of Scientology: you'll have a good chuckle.
See you next week in the comments!

Re:
You've started with a legit yet incorrect statement, and I considering replying, but you finished in a tinfoil territory, so I decided not to bother.
(untitled comment)
An interesting discussion is going on on my blog: even X-Art/Malibu Media co-owner chimed in...
Re: Re: Re:
It is definitely doable: you cannot post duplicate tweets for instance.
Re:
Its an incorrect statement.
Re:
Its an incorrect statement.
Re: ZOMG! The return of PRENDA!
As the critic who is being sued by Prenda for defamation, I'm upset by being remained about this horrific ongoing event. Most likely I won't be able to sleep tonight, full of grave thoughts. Maybe I even decide that life is not not worth experiencing this tormenting.
Can you link to another post about Prenda next time? Thank you.
Re:
Sorry for both duplicate comment and offtopic: my Logitech mouse is (was) great, but the second one in 6 months failed with the same symptom: it sometimes fires double-click code when you single-click.
Apparently if you double-click on "submit" button, two identical comments are submitted.
(untitled comment)
Winding down?
I have a tip that Lutz made harassing calls as recently as today. But he didn't say "Prenda," so no contradiction here. Right.
(untitled comment)
Winding down?
I have a tip that Lutz made harassing calls as recently as today. But he didn't say "Prenda," so no contradiction here. Right.
Re: pdf link?
http://ia600504.us.archive.org/14/items/gov.uscourts.ca9.13-55881/gov.uscourts.ca9.13-55881.docket.h tml : Doc. #9
(untitled comment)
Prenda principals had been dreaming about cars, beaches and casinos. Judge Wright fulfilled the casino part: "To play, add more funds."
(untitled comment)
A plaintiff is estopped from asserting a copyright claim “if he has aided the defendant in infringing or otherwise induced it to infringe or has committed covert acts such as holding out ... by silence or inaction.” Field v. Google, Inc., 412 F. Supp. 2d 1106, 1115-17 (D. Nev. 2006) citing Quinn v. City of Detroit, 23 F. Supp. 2d 741, 753 (E.D. Mich. 1998).
(untitled comment)
John Steele, let me make an announcement for you, an announcement you should have made day before yesterday:
"I would like to thank Mr. Neville for uncovering the mega-thief, the initial seeder of our client's copyrighted works. Your our hero, Delvan. Our team of lawyers is currently filing numerous lawsuits around the country... and motions for early discovery asking judges to subpoena ISPs in order to unmask the criminal who nearly destroyed our client's business. Mumbo Jumbo Chicken Gumbo!"
Re: Re:
He is a Gödel douche: cannot be consistent and complete[ly full of shit] at the same time.
Re: Re:
John knows that he is very welcome ;)
Re: Re: Re:
Sorry, I should have edited it out: definitely it is not, someone simply entered this IP address in the name field while discussing it. Search is performed over all the fields...
If it happened half a year ago, I would feel really bad because I accidentally exposed a guy whose IP address could be in Prenda's database. Steele is know for his vindictiveness (see the most disgusting Steele's comment #4). Fortunately, today crooks can't do anything to anyone, they are busy digging to China.
Re:
Yes I checked. Not this address, but other Mullvad nodes are present. See Exhibit K-4 to Delvan's affidavit: it's my email with all (to the best of my effort) the comments suspected to be from Steele.
Re: I wonder
It's Mullvad VPN: we know for ages that Steele and his gang uses this relatively unknown VPN provider: he left a ton of comments on FCT and DTD while connected to that VPN.
Re: Re: The location of that IP adress
Sorry, correction: not MN Comcast, but another one, Mullvad.
Re: Re: The location of that IP adress
Sorry, correction: not MN Comcast, but another one, Mullvad.